Centralised MsgBox
in [Visual Basic]
|
Prev: crack for VSFlex8 in VB6.0
Next: Component Handles
From: Karl E. Peterson on 12 Oct 2009 17:34 Scott M. wrote: >> Let hasn't been required since Dartmouth BASICs. It was one of the very >> first optional keywords. > > Then how else are you supposed to define a property's "setter" in VB 6.0? Ahhh, my mistake. You're using terminology that's not common here, and my eyes glazed right over it. Used in that manner, yes, it's unquestionably required. >> The following code is from ALPHABET.BAS, dated 04/08/1982, which shipped >> with IBM PC BASIC v1.00 -- take a look at lines 90, 110, etc: > > Great! What's your point in showing it here? What's your point in being here? -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Eduardo on 12 Oct 2009 23:28 Nobody escribi�: > One of Google changes is that if you search by subject, and you enter one of > the common words(the,a,to, etc.), your search will return no results. I don't see it: http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=insubject%3Athe+insubject%3Amatrix http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=insubject%3Aa+insubject%3Amatrix http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=insubject%3Athe+insubject%3Aend http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=insubject%3Athe+insubject%3Abeginning
From: Scott M. on 14 Oct 2009 15:21 "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote in message news:uF35xK4SKHA.4048(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > What a priss. > So you're gonna go outside, then, and play hide go fnck yourself? Translation: I don't have a valid point to make, so I'll act like a child and call people names.
From: Scott M. on 14 Oct 2009 15:26 "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote in message news:uZGwYP4SKHA.1236(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Scott M. wrote: >>> Let hasn't been required since Dartmouth BASICs. It was one of the very >>> first optional keywords. >> >> Then how else are you supposed to define a property's "setter" in VB 6.0? > > Ahhh, my mistake. You're using terminology that's not common here, and my > eyes glazed right over it. Used in that manner, yes, it's unquestionably > required. > "Let" isn't common in VB 6.0? That's your reply, which you wrote to mean because I'm using a term you consider to be not common that it's understandable that you missed my rerference to it as the required way to set a property "setter" up twice? Come on Karl. I give you some credit for at least admitting you were wrong, but don't make it out to be because you were tired and I'm using uncommon terminology. You missed it (twice) because you were too busy bashing me and not familiar enough with VB 6.0 to know when the word is used. Making a property is hardly uncommon. -Scott
From: Kevin Provance on 14 Oct 2009 16:26
| You missed it (twice) because you were too busy bashing me and | not familiar enough with VB 6.0 to know when the word is used. Wait a minute. You are actually suggesting that Karl Peterson is not familiar "enough" with VB6? Are you fncking serious? Why not say Ernie Davis had no business on the football filed, or Babe Ruth had no business in baseball. Maybe Bogey and Bacall had no buisness on the silver screen too, right? http://vb.mvps.org/ Since *you* clearly have no idea what *you* are talking about, you've just made our point in that you are a worthless troll with no business in this community. You need to show some respect. You single handedly managed to irritate one of the most learned and respected members of this community. Making such statements without actually doing your homework only makes you look like the world's biggest @$$. Congrats on that. Good job. Idiot. |