Centralised MsgBox
in [Visual Basic]
|
Prev: crack for VSFlex8 in VB6.0
Next: Component Handles
From: Scott M. on 14 Oct 2009 16:56 "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote in message news:Ox$$n3QTKHA.1372(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Scott M. wrote: >> "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote ... >> >>> What a priss. >>> So you're gonna go outside, then, and play hide go fnck yourself? >> >> Translation: I don't have a valid point to make, so I'll act like a >> child >> and call people names. > > Almost. I'll act like our former VP, and tell you where to go and what > "valid point" you ought to "consider" while there. > > FOAD, troll. Just keep on making my point for me Karl. Thanks.
From: Scott M. on 14 Oct 2009 16:56 "Kevin Provance" <bill(a)localhost.com> wrote in message news:%23qQMg%23QTKHA.4692(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > > "Scott M." <s-mar(a)nospam.nospam> wrote in message > news:%23aW1Z4QTKHA.4324(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > | > | "Kevin Provance" <bill(a)localhost.com> wrote in message > | news:O74lUyQTKHA.5052(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > | >| You missed it (twice) because you were too busy bashing me and > | > | not familiar enough with VB 6.0 to know when the word is used. > | > > | > Wait a minute. You are actually suggesting that Karl Peterson is not > | > familiar "enough" with VB6? Are you fncking serious? Why not say > Ernie > | > Davis had no business on the football filed, or Babe Ruth had no > business > | > in > | > baseball. Maybe Bogey and Bacall had no buisness on the silver screen > | > too, > | > right? > | > > | > http://vb.mvps.org/ > | > > | > Since *you* clearly have no idea what *you* are talking about, you've > just > | > made our point in that you are a worthless troll with no business in > this > | > community. > | > > | > You need to show some respect. You single handedly managed to > irritate > | > one > | > of the most learned and respected members of this community. Making > such > | > statements without actually doing your homework only makes you look > like > | > the > | > world's biggest @$$. Congrats on that. Good job. > | > > | > Idiot. > | > | I have no problem calling someone out when they have challenged me to > prove > | my point (which is what Karl did). I don't care what letters he's got > after > | his name, that doesn't mean he just deserves my respect. Especially > with > | the way he's treated me. You get respect in life by giving it and > earning > | it, not because of some title you have. Karl has done nothing to earn > my > | respect. And, if you want to pray at the altar of someone who doesn't > even > | know what the "Let" keyword is used for (very commonly I might add), > that's > | your business, but it tells me that he's not the God you think he is. > | > | And, as I've made it abundantly clear, I really don't care what your > | opinions are either Kevin. > | > | I think that if you go back and read your posts, Karl's posts, and > Kevin's > | posts to me, you'll find that they are full of unprovoked personal > attacks > | and insults. That is not what anyone who deserves respect does. You > want > | to disagree with me? Fine. But the minute you start calling people > names > | and making up lies about them, you become the very thing you hate. > | > | Read the posts and see who has said what. > | > | -Scott > > TL;DR > > Damn you are a bloody crybaby. Wahhh, wahhhh You don't dissapoint Kevin.
From: Scott M. on 14 Oct 2009 17:08 "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote in message news:O1Xer6QTKHA.4408(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Scott M. wrote: >>> Ahhh, my mistake. You're using terminology that's not common here, and >>> my >>> eyes glazed right over it. Used in that manner, yes, it's >>> unquestionably >>> required. >> >> "Let" isn't common in VB 6.0? > > By itself, it's virtually extinct, yeah. I cannot recall having seen it > used in the manner I imagined you were suggesting in at least two decades. Well since the manner I suggested it was used was for property setting (twice), I don't know how you could have misunderstood. And, for someone who is supposed to be a VB 6.0 guru, I would think the word's usage would have come to mind. > >> That's your reply, which you wrote to mean >> because I'm using a term you consider to be not common that it's >> understandable that you missed my rerference to it as the required way to >> set a property "setter" up twice? > > It's the term you found necessary to put quotes around that I found to be > an uncommon one. It simply didn't register with me, given the amount of > bandwidth you had earned to that point, WTH you were talking about. Again, your admission is veiled in an insult. > >> Come on Karl. I give you some credit for at least admitting you were >> wrong, > > Whatever. I'm just being honest. > >> but don't make it out to be because you were tired and I'm using uncommon >> terminology. > > <yawn> > >> not familiar enough with VB 6.0 to know when the word is used. > > <chuckle> > >> Making a property is hardly uncommon. > > Hardly. Making property "setters" is less common, though. And, fwiw, > when those are made, one uses Set rather than Let. HTH! If you agree that making properties is not uncommon (which it's not), then to say that making a property setter is is laughable. And, FWIW, when those are made, they are very often made with "Let": http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/77kezfet(VS.85).aspx You use Property Set only when the property will hold an object reference. If not, you MUST use Let. Since a huge amount of properties hold simple data (integers, booleans, etc), the Let syntax is the correct syntax. Again, you get partial credit for admitting you were wrong, but you sound like a child because you can't do it without somehow making your mistake based on some insulting factor attributed to me. That pretty much sums up how you've interacted with me Karl. -Scott
From: Kevin Provance on 14 Oct 2009 17:18 | | You don't dissapoint Kevin. | Words I hear from your wife on a regular basis.
From: Scott M. on 14 Oct 2009 18:27
"Kevin Provance" <bill(a)localhost.com> wrote in message news:e3DWgPRTKHA.1236(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > | > | You don't dissapoint Kevin. > | > > Words I hear from your wife on a regular basis. > > That's funny! Now, I know that you are a troll AND I know that you are a kid. |