From: Nial Stewart on
> Without revealing anything proprietary, can you help me
> understand the advantages of these high performance
> FPGAs in electronic ballast design? I'm also struggling
> to imagine a role for the ADC.
> Could you point out the location of these parts in the
> diagram for me please?


Before you get all sarcastic, did you read the other link in
Dave Jones' original post?


Nial.


From: Winston on
On 6/28/2010 7:43 AM, Nial Stewart wrote:
>> Without revealing anything proprietary, can you help me
>> understand the advantages of these high performance
>> FPGAs in electronic ballast design? I'm also struggling
>> to imagine a role for the ADC.
>> Could you point out the location of these parts in the
>> diagram for me please?
>
>
> Before you get all sarcastic, did you read the other link in
> Dave Jones' original post?

I apologize for my excessive snark; I was surprised by the
'subject drift'.

The article mentions memory chips, transistors, resistors and
capacitors.

No mention of high performance, single source FPGAs,
which aren't quite the 'commodity' (multiple source) parts
exemplified by memory chips, transistors, resistors and capacitors.

I expect that parts manufacturers are just angling for
higher prices. We'll pay, because China Inc. is the only
source.

For the right money, that 12 month commodity lead time would
magically shrink to nearly nothing.

It's the second oldest game in the world.

--Winston
From: Nial Stewart on
>> Before you get all sarcastic, did you read the other link in
>> Dave Jones' original post?
>
> I apologize for my excessive snark; I was surprised by the
> 'subject drift'.

No problem :-)



> The article mentions memory chips, transistors, resistors and
> capacitors.
> No mention of high performance, single source FPGAs,
> which aren't quite the 'commodity' (multiple source) parts
> exemplified by memory chips, transistors, resistors and capacitors.

No fair enough, but in the last 15 years once Altera devices have been
released they have generally been easy to get hold of.

I know the FAE I'm dealing with very well and believe him when he said
that they had to scour the EBV European stocks to provide 4 samples
for prototyping.

Analog showed no stock on the web site. Customer support in the
States said they didn't have any of the ADCs, and all their
distributors were out too.

Both firms are quoting three or four months lead time.

> I expect that parts manufacturers are just angling for
> higher prices. We'll pay, because China Inc. is the only
> source.
> For the right money, that 12 month commodity lead time would
> magically shrink to nearly nothing.
> It's the second oldest game in the world.

I'm not sure, the Altera FAE was genuinely frustrated. He said
the only thing saving their bacon is that Xilinx are in nearly
the same position.


Nial.






From: Winston on
On 6/29/2010 12:47 AM, Nial Stewart wrote:

(...)

> No fair enough, but in the last 15 years once Altera devices have been
> released they have generally been easy to get hold of.

Still 'single sourced' 'non-commodity' parts, yes?

(...)

> Both firms are quoting three or four months lead time.

I would love to know the 'back story'!
How is it even *possible* to have that kind of backlog in 2010
unless they discovered a significant design flaw and are re-spinning?

(...)

(WRT 'commodity parts':)
>> For the right money, that 12 month commodity lead time would
>> magically shrink to nearly nothing.
>> It's the second oldest game in the world.
>
> I'm not sure, the Altera FAE was genuinely frustrated. He said
> the only thing saving their bacon is that Xilinx are in nearly
> the same position.

I've been out of the game for a long time but I still wonder:
Is his response 'code' for "re-design using Lattice, Actel,
Cypress, Quicklogic, Silicon Blue, Achronix, etc."?


--Winston
From: Joerg on
Winston wrote:
> On 6/29/2010 12:47 AM, Nial Stewart wrote:
>

[...]

> (WRT 'commodity parts':)
>>> For the right money, that 12 month commodity lead time would
>>> magically shrink to nearly nothing.
>>> It's the second oldest game in the world.
>>
>> I'm not sure, the Altera FAE was genuinely frustrated. He said
>> the only thing saving their bacon is that Xilinx are in nearly
>> the same position.
>
> I've been out of the game for a long time but I still wonder:
> Is his response 'code' for "re-design using Lattice, Actel,
> Cypress, Quicklogic, Silicon Blue, Achronix, etc."?
>

The real message is: Try your darndest to design it with discretes,
simple logic chips, maybe 80C51 and whatever else is needed. No more
FPGA. Which is what I generally do, then there are half a dozen sources
and never a shortage :-)

I know this sounds kind of Luddite but it has served my clients quite well.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Bad Resistors
Next: 4mA current regulator