From: Joe Wangkauf on
In article <2010012121495016807-breamdotrockmettellerat(a)macdotcom>,
Bream Rockmetteller <bream-dot.rockmetteller-at(a)mac-dot.com> wrote:

> Then
> I'll resume using rn.

rn?

--
.... something witty goes here ...
From: Warren Oates on
In article <pjh-7073A4.21453321012010(a)news.individual.net>,
Percival John Hackworth <pjh(a)mps.com> wrote:

> I'd like to see Brian Clarke bankrupt, homeless, and sleeping in his
> car. His attitude toward his supporting his customers and product won't
> ever get me to buy anything he's associated with, except maybe graveside
> tickets to his funeral, so I make sure he's really dead.

Now Percival John, that is the kind of thing that the ned-flanders types
around here don't like. You will surely be in the killfile for such
intemperate statements.
--
Very old woody beets will never cook tender.
-- Fannie Farmer
From: gtr on
On 2010-01-21 15:11:51 -0800, Guenther Fischer <never(a)spam.invalid> said:

> In article <sdfisher-CC3840.13402621012010(a)mara100-84.onlink.net>,
> Steven Fisher <sdfisher(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <210120101207104184%tmo1138(a)invalid.gmail.domain.com>,
>> tmo1138 <tmo1138(a)invalid.gmail.domain.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually Brian has been selling it again for the last 2 or so years.
>>> I know someone who just registered it.
>>>
>>> It works.. is pretty comprehensive and overall does a fine job.
>>
>> You're paying for stolen goods, etc, etc.
>>
>> It's boring by now.
>
> What a nonsense. I have worked with old Norstad´s Newsreader ten years
> ago. This story ended in old Mac OS times. Brian made an excellent
> product for OS X out of Newsreader and never forgot to thank Norstad:
> "Many thanks also to John Norstad for his NewsWatcher program that
> showed how a Macintosh newsreader should look and behave."
> Today, Unison is the only (commercial) program that comes close to
> Thoth. I would like to see Thoth back in the market and I would pay for
> an upgrade.

Jesus. What did I tell you...
--
Thank you and have a nice day.

From: gtr on
On 2010-01-21 19:36:05 -0800, Joe Wangkauf
<tmo1138(a)invalid.gmail.domain.com> said:

> \I'd bet the effort to make this code work (and work well) in OS X takes
> it so far from Norstad's code (that wasn't his begin with) that the
> argument (if there even was one to begin with) has been rendered
> pointless.

Pointless arguments? Here on usenet? Is that really possible?
--
Thank you and have a nice day.

From: Phil Stripling on
In article <220120100543514508%tmo1138(a)invalid.gmail.domain.com>, Joe
Wangkauf <tmo1138(a)invalid.gmail.domain.com> wrote:

> In article <2010012121495016807-breamdotrockmettellerat(a)macdotcom>,
> Bream Rockmetteller <bream-dot.rockmetteller-at(a)mac-dot.com> wrote:
>
> > Then
> > I'll resume using rn.
>
> rn?

May I google that for you? :->