From: Jerry Gerrone on
On Sep 20, 6:39 pm, "Harold \"Curly\" Phillips"
<haroldphill...(a)live.invalid> wrote:
> "Lars Enderin" <lars.ende...(a)telia.com> wrote in message
> > Dave Searles wrote:
> >> [implied insult deleted]

No, Dave is the hornet's nest.

None of the nasty things that Dave has said or implied about me are at
all true.

> > For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone

No need to assume. Just check our post headers, or notice that he's
bloody ATTACKED me.

> > (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
> > [false accusation deleted]

No, Joe Attardi did.

None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me are at
all true.

> > [insult deleted]

No. None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me
are at all true.

> [numerous vicious insults deleted]

No, you're the nuisance.

None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
all true.

> ao...(a)freenet.carleton.ca Paul Derbyshire

Not me.

> pderb...(a)usa.net   Paul Derbyshire

Not me.

> nebulou...(a)gmail.com  -

Me.

> twisted...(a)gmail.com  Twisted

Me.

> bbo...(a)gmail.com  -

Me.

> b.phill...(a)a5723mailhost.net Ben Phillips

Not me.

> twerpina...(a)gmail.com  -

Me.

> reckonin...(a)gmail.com  -

Me.

> scuzwa...(a)gmail.com  Jerry Gerrone

Me. (Obviously.)

> snick...(a)gmail.com  Saint Nick

Me.

> sdr...(a)foomail.bar.com  secret decoder ring

Not me.

> hzergel...(a)gmail.com  -

Me.

> fenco...(a)gmail.com  -

Me.

> smacrae...(a)live.ca.nospam Seamus MacRae

Not me.

> hyarmouth991...(a)hotmail.com Harold Yarmouth

Not me.

> pgd...(a)gmail.com  Paul Derbyshire

Forgery to try to shut down certain idiots that keep confusing me with
the REAL P.D.

> kolot...(a)gmail.com  Captain Koloth

Me.

> blue.ind...(a)uatel.com  Blue Indigo

Not me, but I remember him. This guy was almost as big a thorn in my
side as Lars-hole here for a while.

> lkw4...(a)gmail.com  Larry K. Wollensham

Not me.

> corbomi...(a)gmail.com  Corbomite Device

Me.

> lgml...(a)gmail.com  Little Green Man

Me.

> murd...(a)no.spam.please.com Gerald Murdock

Not me.

> sear...(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk Dave Searles

Not me.

> I expect he has used many other aliases and will use many more.

The ones you missed are:

Prior #3 (prior.no.3(a)gmail.com)
Sigmund Freud (sigmundf82(a)gmail.com)
Retahiv Oopsiscame (roopsisc(a)gmail.com)

Only three. Not a bad false negative rate, apparently better than even
you expected. Your false positive rate was way higher though. You
really need to work on that.
From: Jerry Gerrone on
On Sep 20, 7:31 pm, Arne Vajhøj <a...(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 6:39 pm, "Harold \"Curly\" Phillips"
> <haroldphill...(a)live.invalid> wrote:
>> "Lars Enderin" <lars.ende...(a)telia.com> wrote in message
>> > Dave Searles wrote:
>> >> [implied insult deleted]

No, Dave is the hornet's nest.

None of the nasty things that Dave has said or implied about me are at
all true.

>> > For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone

No need to assume. Just check our post headers, or notice that he's
bloody ATTACKED me.

>> > (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
>> > [false accusation deleted]

No, Joe Attardi did.

None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me are at
all true.

>> > [insult deleted]

No. None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me
are at all true.

>> [numerous vicious insults deleted]

No, Harold is the nuisance.

None of the nasty things that Harold has said or implied about me are
at
all true.

>> ao...(a)freenet.carleton.ca Paul Derbyshire

Not me.

>> pderb...(a)usa.net Paul Derbyshire

Not me.

>> nebulou...(a)gmail.com -

Me.

>> twisted...(a)gmail.com Twisted

Me.

>> bbo...(a)gmail.com -

Me.

>> b.phill...(a)a5723mailhost.net Ben Phillips

Not me.

>> twerpina...(a)gmail.com -

Me.

>> reckonin...(a)gmail.com -

Me.

>> scuzwa...(a)gmail.com Jerry Gerrone

Me. (Obviously.)

>> snick...(a)gmail.com Saint Nick

Me.

>> sdr...(a)foomail.bar.com secret decoder ring

Not me.

>> hzergel...(a)gmail.com -

Me.

>> fenco...(a)gmail.com -

Me.

>> smacrae...(a)live.ca.nospam Seamus MacRae

Not me.

>> hyarmouth991...(a)hotmail.com Harold Yarmouth

Not me.

>> pgd...(a)gmail.com Paul Derbyshire

Forgery to try to shut down certain idiots that keep confusing me with
the REAL P.D.

>> kolot...(a)gmail.com Captain Koloth

Me.

>> blue.ind...(a)uatel.com Blue Indigo

Not me, but I remember him. This guy was almost as big a thorn in my
side as Arnehole here for a while.

>> lkw4...(a)gmail.com Larry K. Wollensham

Not me.

>> corbomi...(a)gmail.com Corbomite Device

Me.

>> lgml...(a)gmail.com Little Green Man

Me.

>> murd...(a)no.spam.please.com Gerald Murdock

Not me.

>> sear...(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk Dave Searles

Not me.

>> I expect he has used many other aliases and will use many more.

The ones Harold missed are:

Prior #3 (prior.n...(a)gmail.com)
Sigmund Freud (sigmund...(a)gmail.com)
Retahiv Oopsiscame (roops...(a)gmail.com)

Only three. Not a bad false negative rate, apparently better than even
Harold himself expected. His false positive rate was way higher
though. He
really needs to work on that.

> If properly added he would probably make #1 on Wojteks list.
>
> [implied insult deleted]

No. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me
are at all true.
From: Jerry Gerrone on
On Sep 20, 7:33 pm, Arne Vajhøj <a...(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> Dave Searles wrote:
> > Lars Enderin wrote:
> >> Dave Searles wrote:
> >>> I can only presume that [implied insult deleted]

No, Dave is the hornet's nest.

None of the nasty things that Dave has said or implied about me are at
all true.

> >> For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone

No need to assume; just examine our post headers, or merely observe
that Dave has ATTACKED me.

> >> (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
> >> [false accusation deleted]

No, Joe Attardi did that.

None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me are at
all true.

> >> [insult deleted]

No. None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me
are at all true.

> >> your reaction to valid criticism trips you up.
>
> > What "valid criticism"? I have yet to see any.
>
> Rather revealing I would say !

To a paranoid lunatic like yourself, perhaps.
From: Jerry Gerrone on
On Sep 21, 6:47 am, Dave Searles <sear...(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk> wrote:
> Lars Enderin wrote:
> > Dave Searles wrote:
> >> Lars Enderin wrote:
> >>> Dave Searles wrote:
> >>>> I can only presume that you [implied insult deleted]

No, you're the hornet's nest.

None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
all true.

> >>> For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone

You ATTACKED me several times. Obviously you're not me -- though these
paranoid lunatics will never see it.

> >>> (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
> >>> [false accusation deleted]

No, Joe Attardi did that.

None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me are at
all true.

> >>> [insult deleted]

No. None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me
are at all true.

> [rest deleted]
From: Jerry Gerrone on
On Sep 21, 6:47 am, Dave Searles <sear...(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk> wrote:
> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> > Dave Searles wrote:
> >> Lars Enderin wrote:
> >>> Dave Searles wrote:
> >>>> I can only presume that you [implied insult deleted]

No, you're the hornet's nest.

None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
all true.

> >>> For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone

Well, you of course know that you are not.

> >>> (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
> >>> [false accusation deleted]

No, Joe Attardi did that.

None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me are at
all true.

> >>> [insult deleted]

No. None of the nasty things that Lars has said or implied about me
are at all true.

> >>> your reaction to valid criticism trips you up.
> >> What "valid criticism"? I have yet to see any.
> > Rather revealing I would say !
>
> Revealing of what? That, however I might respond to *valid* criticism,
> when faced with *invalid* criticism I do not meekly accept it? I'd say
> that that's an admirable trait.

That much I must agree with.