From: Lew on
"Dave Searles" wrote:
>> Number four certainly is a personal criticism. It's a statement that he
>> expects my code to contain serious bugs, which is clearly a direct
>> questioning of my competence. The others imply indirect such
>> questioning.

Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
> I really get sick of these kinds of threads. He didn't say anything that
> was an attack on you. The idea that new code is more likely to have bugs
> than old code is simply true... even if you are the best programmer that
> ever lived.
>
> Get a thicker skin.

This thread has truly been Twisted off its path. What does feeding the troll
do to further the topic?

--
Lew
From: Dave Searles on
Lew wrote:
> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
>> Get a thicker skin.
>
> What does feeding the troll do to further the topic?

To what troll do you refer? Peter Duniho? Yourself?
From: Lars Enderin on
Lew wrote:
> "Dave Searles" wrote:
>>> Number four certainly is a personal criticism. It's a statement that he
>>> expects my code to contain serious bugs, which is clearly a direct
>>> questioning of my competence. The others imply indirect such
>>> questioning.
>
> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
>> I really get sick of these kinds of threads. He didn't say anything
>> that was an attack on you. The idea that new code is more likely to
>> have bugs than old code is simply true... even if you are the best
>> programmer that ever lived.
>> Get a thicker skin.
>
> This thread has truly been Twisted off its path. What does feeding the
> troll do to further the topic?
>
Yes, Dave Searles must be Twisted, a k a Jerry Gerrone, etc, etc. His
familiar M O is even more apparent in comp.lang.emacs, in an
interminable thread which seems to be crossposted to comp.lang.lisp.
This Twisted character is beyond salvation. He deserves no respect.
From: Kenneth P. Turvey on
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:33:12 +0000, Lars Enderin wrote:

> Yes, Dave Searles must be Twisted, a k a Jerry Gerrone, etc, etc. His
> familiar M O is even more apparent in comp.lang.emacs, in an
> interminable thread which seems to be crossposted to comp.lang.lisp.
> This Twisted character is beyond salvation. He deserves no respect.

I plonked him.

I may look at his message ids and see if there is a way to kill any
message for which he is in the references. These threads are getting
really annoying.

--
Kenneth P. Turvey <evoturvey(a)gmail.com>
From: Kenneth P. Turvey on
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:33:12 +0000, Lars Enderin wrote:

> Lew wrote:
>> "Dave Searles" wrote:
>>>> Number four certainly is a personal criticism. It's a statement that
>>>> he expects my code to contain serious bugs, which is clearly a direct
>>>> questioning of my competence. The others imply indirect such
>>>> questioning.
>>
>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
>>> I really get sick of these kinds of threads. He didn't say anything
>>> that was an attack on you. The idea that new code is more likely to
>>> have bugs than old code is simply true... even if you are the best
>>> programmer that ever lived.
>>> Get a thicker skin.
>>
>> This thread has truly been Twisted off its path. What does feeding the
>> troll do to further the topic?
>>
> Yes, Dave Searles must be Twisted, a k a Jerry Gerrone, etc, etc. His
> familiar M O is even more apparent in comp.lang.emacs, in an
> interminable thread which seems to be crossposted to comp.lang.lisp.
> This Twisted character is beyond salvation. He deserves no respect.

Apparently he is posting through news.eternal-september.org. Does anyone
know if killing all threads with this domain in the references would have
an adverse effect on my enjoyment of this newsgroup? Is it is a popular
USENET server?

Thanks.

--
Kenneth P. Turvey <evoturvey(a)gmail.com>