From: "Harold "Curly" Phillips" on

"Lars Enderin" <lars.enderin(a)telia.com> wrote in message
news:4AB69548.4050502(a)telia.com...
> Dave Searles wrote:
>> Jerry Gerrone wrote:
>>>
>>> None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
>>> all true.
>>
>> Oh. my. God.
>>
>> What the HELL have you unleashed, Lew? I count three posts by this guy
>> and a dozen or so by "Nebulous", all repeating the above lines over and
>> over.
>>
>> I can only presume that you stirred up some sort of hornet's nest, since
>> all of those posts are either responses to your post with what Jerry
>> characterizes as a "paranoid delusion and insult" or indirect followups
>> to the same post.
>
> For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone
> (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
> started one of the longest flame wars in Usenet history). If so, a word of
> advice:
> Your behaviour in this/these group(s) is almost as bad as Jerry's, and
> that's really bad. It's very easy to believe that you are the same person,
> just trying to be free of the Twisted stigma, but your reaction to valid
> criticism trips you up.
> You should clean up your act.

He's very unlikely to clean up his act, he's been a nuisance on usenet for
at least fifteen years. In that time he has received lots of well-meant
advice that he is evidently unable to process.

Some aliases which all eventually exhibited some or all of his identifying
behaviours:

ao950(a)freenet.carleton.ca Paul Derbyshire
pderbysh(a)usa.net Paul Derbyshire
nebulous99(a)gmail.com -
twisted0n3(a)gmail.com Twisted
bbound(a)gmail.com -
b.phillips(a)a5723mailhost.net Ben Phillips
twerpinator(a)gmail.com -
reckoning54(a)gmail.com -
scuzwalla(a)gmail.com Jerry Gerrone
snick463(a)gmail.com Saint Nick
sdring(a)foomail.bar.com secret decoder ring
hzergel901(a)gmail.com -
fencore1(a)gmail.com -
smacrae319(a)live.ca.nospam Seamus MacRae
hyarmouth991476(a)hotmail.com Harold Yarmouth
pgderb(a)gmail.com Paul Derbyshire
koloth17(a)gmail.com Captain Koloth
blue.indigo(a)uatel.com Blue Indigo
lkw4096(a)gmail.com Larry K. Wollensham
corbomite9(a)gmail.com Corbomite Device
lgmlgm1(a)gmail.com Little Green Man
serexp1(a)gmail.com Series Expansion
murdock(a)no.spam.please.com Gerald Murdock
cautoma(a)gmail.com Cellular Automaton
searles(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk Dave Searles

I expect he has used many other aliases and will use many more.

From: Arne Vajhøj on
Harold "Curly" Phillips wrote:
> "Lars Enderin" <lars.enderin(a)telia.com> wrote in message
> news:4AB69548.4050502(a)telia.com...
>> Dave Searles wrote:
>>> Jerry Gerrone wrote:
>>>>
>>>> None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
>>>> all true.
>>>
>>> Oh. my. God.
>>>
>>> What the HELL have you unleashed, Lew? I count three posts by this
>>> guy and a dozen or so by "Nebulous", all repeating the above lines
>>> over and over.
>>>
>>> I can only presume that you stirred up some sort of hornet's nest,
>>> since all of those posts are either responses to your post with what
>>> Jerry characterizes as a "paranoid delusion and insult" or indirect
>>> followups to the same post.
>>
>> For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone
>> (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
>> started one of the longest flame wars in Usenet history). If so, a
>> word of advice:
>> Your behaviour in this/these group(s) is almost as bad as Jerry's, and
>> that's really bad. It's very easy to believe that you are the same
>> person, just trying to be free of the Twisted stigma, but your
>> reaction to valid criticism trips you up.
>> You should clean up your act.
>
> He's very unlikely to clean up his act, he's been a nuisance on usenet
> for at least fifteen years. In that time he has received lots of
> well-meant advice that he is evidently unable to process.
>
> Some aliases which all eventually exhibited some or all of his
> identifying behaviours:
>
> ao950(a)freenet.carleton.ca Paul Derbyshire
> pderbysh(a)usa.net Paul Derbyshire
> nebulous99(a)gmail.com -
> twisted0n3(a)gmail.com Twisted
> bbound(a)gmail.com -
> b.phillips(a)a5723mailhost.net Ben Phillips
> twerpinator(a)gmail.com -
> reckoning54(a)gmail.com -
> scuzwalla(a)gmail.com Jerry Gerrone
> snick463(a)gmail.com Saint Nick
> sdring(a)foomail.bar.com secret decoder ring
> hzergel901(a)gmail.com -
> fencore1(a)gmail.com -
> smacrae319(a)live.ca.nospam Seamus MacRae
> hyarmouth991476(a)hotmail.com Harold Yarmouth
> pgderb(a)gmail.com Paul Derbyshire
> koloth17(a)gmail.com Captain Koloth
> blue.indigo(a)uatel.com Blue Indigo
> lkw4096(a)gmail.com Larry K. Wollensham
> corbomite9(a)gmail.com Corbomite Device
> lgmlgm1(a)gmail.com Little Green Man
> serexp1(a)gmail.com Series Expansion
> murdock(a)no.spam.please.com Gerald Murdock
> cautoma(a)gmail.com Cellular Automaton
> searles(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk Dave Searles
>
> I expect he has used many other aliases and will use many more.

If properly added he would probably make #1 on Wojteks list.

I could also think of a few other lists where he would make #1.

Arne
From: Arne Vajhøj on
Dave Searles wrote:
> Lars Enderin wrote:
>> Dave Searles wrote:
>>> I can only presume that you stirred up some sort of hornet's nest,
>>> since all of those posts are either responses to your post with what
>>> Jerry characterizes as a "paranoid delusion and insult" or indirect
>>> followups to the same post.
>>
>> For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone
>> (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
>> started one of the longest flame wars in Usenet history). If so, a
>> word of advice:
>> Your behaviour in this/these group(s) is almost as bad
>
> No. There is nothing at all wrong with my behavior and you will stop
> publicly suggesting otherwise. Doing so is not on topic in any comp.*
> newsgroup anyway.
>
> I hope I have made myself adequately clear.
>
>> your reaction to valid criticism trips you up.
>
> What "valid criticism"? I have yet to see any.

Rather revealing I would say !

Arne
From: Dave Searles on
Lars Enderin wrote:
> Dave Searles wrote:
>> Lars Enderin wrote:
>>> Dave Searles wrote:
>>>> I can only presume that you stirred up some sort of hornet's nest,
>>>> since all of those posts are either responses to your post with what
>>>> Jerry characterizes as a "paranoid delusion and insult" or indirect
>>>> followups to the same post.
>>>
>>> For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone
>>> (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
>>> started one of the longest flame wars in Usenet history). If so, a
>>> word of advice:
>>> Your behaviour in this/these group(s) is almost as bad
>>
>> No. There is nothing at all wrong with my behavior and you will stop
>> publicly suggesting otherwise. Doing so is not on topic in any comp.*
>> newsgroup anyway.
>>
>> I hope I have made myself adequately clear.
>>
>>> your reaction to valid criticism trips you up.
>>
>> What "valid criticism"? I have yet to see any.
>
> [personal attack deleted]

Buzz off.
From: Dave Searles on
Arne Vajh�j wrote:
> Dave Searles wrote:
>> Lars Enderin wrote:
>>> Dave Searles wrote:
>>>> I can only presume that you stirred up some sort of hornet's nest,
>>>> since all of those posts are either responses to your post with what
>>>> Jerry characterizes as a "paranoid delusion and insult" or indirect
>>>> followups to the same post.
>>>
>>> For the sake of argument, let's assume that you are not Jerry Gerrone
>>> (Nebulous is just one of his names - Twisted is the name in which he
>>> started one of the longest flame wars in Usenet history). If so, a
>>> word of advice:
>>> Your behaviour in this/these group(s) is almost as bad
>>
>> No. There is nothing at all wrong with my behavior and you will stop
>> publicly suggesting otherwise. Doing so is not on topic in any comp.*
>> newsgroup anyway.
>>
>> I hope I have made myself adequately clear.
>>
>>> your reaction to valid criticism trips you up.
>>
>> What "valid criticism"? I have yet to see any.
>
> Rather revealing I would say !

Revealing of what? That, however I might respond to *valid* criticism,
when faced with *invalid* criticism I do not meekly accept it? I'd say
that that's an admirable trait.