Prev: SAX converts apostrophe to '
Next: Some projects were hidden because they exist in the workspace directory
From: Dave Searles on 17 Sep 2009 08:33 Arved Sandstrom wrote: > In article <h8smok$plj$4(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Dave Searles > <searles(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk> wrote: > >> Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> Dave Searles wrote: >>>> Lew wrote: >>>>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote: >>>>>> Get a thicker skin. >>>>> What does feeding the troll do to further the topic? >>>> To what troll do you refer? Peter Duniho? Yourself? >>> You. >> But I am not a troll. > > For what it's worth I personally don't think you are either. I get the > drift that you like contributing to various threads, in a positive way, > just like most of us do. This much is true. > [suggests that I might be "technically unsound"] But that isn't.
From: Daniel Pitts on 17 Sep 2009 16:31 Dave Searles wrote: > Arved Sandstrom wrote: >> In article <h8smok$plj$4(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Dave Searles >> <searles(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk> wrote: >> >>> Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>>> Dave Searles wrote: >>>>> Lew wrote: >>>>>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote: >>>>>>> Get a thicker skin. >>>>>> What does feeding the troll do to further the topic? >>>>> To what troll do you refer? Peter Duniho? Yourself? >>>> You. >>> But I am not a troll. >> >> For what it's worth I personally don't think you are either. I get the >> drift that you like contributing to various threads, in a positive way, >> just like most of us do. > > This much is true. > >> [suggests that I might be "technically unsound"] > > But that isn't. Actually, he only suggests that your opinions might be technically unsound. Don't paraphrase or snip relevant discussion, it only makes you look bad. -- Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>
From: Arne Vajhøj on 17 Sep 2009 21:23 Dave Searles wrote: > Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> Dave Searles wrote: >>> Lew wrote: >>>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote: >>>>> Get a thicker skin. >>>> >>>> What does feeding the troll do to further the topic? >>> >>> To what troll do you refer? Peter Duniho? Yourself? >> >> You. > > But I am not a troll. Sure is. Arne
From: Arne Vajhøj on 17 Sep 2009 21:25 Dave Searles wrote: > Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> Lew wrote: >>> "Dave Searles" wrote: >>>>> Number four certainly is a personal criticism. It's a statement >>>>> that he >>>>> expects my code to contain serious bugs, which is clearly a direct >>>>> questioning of my competence. The others imply indirect such >>>>> questioning. >>> >>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote: >>>> I really get sick of these kinds of threads. He didn't say anything >>>> that was an attack on you. The idea that new code is more likely to >>>> have bugs than old code is simply true... even if you are the best >>>> programmer that ever lived. >>>> Get a thicker skin. >>> >>> This thread has truly been Twisted off its path. What does feeding >>> the troll do to further the topic? >> >> Keep him occupied so he do not spam other threads. > > Are you accusing me of being a spammer? Or that Jerry fella? > > I don't know about him, but I most certainly am not a spammer, and given > the severe penalties that accused spammers face, I'm afraid I shall have > to contemplate taking legal action against anyone who falsely accuses me > of spamming. Bla bla bla. Arne
From: Arne Vajhøj on 17 Sep 2009 21:26
Arved Sandstrom wrote: > In article <h8smok$plj$4(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Dave Searles > <searles(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk> wrote: >> Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> Dave Searles wrote: >>>> Lew wrote: >>>>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote: >>>>>> Get a thicker skin. >>>>> What does feeding the troll do to further the topic? >>>> To what troll do you refer? Peter Duniho? Yourself? >>> You. >> But I am not a troll. > > For what it's worth I personally don't think you are either. I get the > drift that you like contributing to various threads, in a positive way, > just like most of us do. You saw the "[personal attack deleted]" replies ?? Arne |