From: Dave Searles on
Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> In article <h8smok$plj$4(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Dave Searles
> <searles(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk> wrote:
>
>> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> Dave Searles wrote:
>>>> Lew wrote:
>>>>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
>>>>>> Get a thicker skin.
>>>>> What does feeding the troll do to further the topic?
>>>> To what troll do you refer? Peter Duniho? Yourself?
>>> You.
>> But I am not a troll.
>
> For what it's worth I personally don't think you are either. I get the
> drift that you like contributing to various threads, in a positive way,
> just like most of us do.

This much is true.

> [suggests that I might be "technically unsound"]

But that isn't.
From: Daniel Pitts on
Dave Searles wrote:
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
>> In article <h8smok$plj$4(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Dave Searles
>> <searles(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>> Dave Searles wrote:
>>>>> Lew wrote:
>>>>>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
>>>>>>> Get a thicker skin.
>>>>>> What does feeding the troll do to further the topic?
>>>>> To what troll do you refer? Peter Duniho? Yourself?
>>>> You.
>>> But I am not a troll.
>>
>> For what it's worth I personally don't think you are either. I get the
>> drift that you like contributing to various threads, in a positive way,
>> just like most of us do.
>
> This much is true.
>
>> [suggests that I might be "technically unsound"]
>
> But that isn't.
Actually, he only suggests that your opinions might be technically
unsound. Don't paraphrase or snip relevant discussion, it only makes
you look bad.

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>
From: Arne Vajhøj on
Dave Searles wrote:
> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> Dave Searles wrote:
>>> Lew wrote:
>>>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
>>>>> Get a thicker skin.
>>>>
>>>> What does feeding the troll do to further the topic?
>>>
>>> To what troll do you refer? Peter Duniho? Yourself?
>>
>> You.
>
> But I am not a troll.

Sure is.

Arne
From: Arne Vajhøj on
Dave Searles wrote:
> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> Lew wrote:
>>> "Dave Searles" wrote:
>>>>> Number four certainly is a personal criticism. It's a statement
>>>>> that he
>>>>> expects my code to contain serious bugs, which is clearly a direct
>>>>> questioning of my competence. The others imply indirect such
>>>>> questioning.
>>>
>>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
>>>> I really get sick of these kinds of threads. He didn't say anything
>>>> that was an attack on you. The idea that new code is more likely to
>>>> have bugs than old code is simply true... even if you are the best
>>>> programmer that ever lived.
>>>> Get a thicker skin.
>>>
>>> This thread has truly been Twisted off its path. What does feeding
>>> the troll do to further the topic?
>>
>> Keep him occupied so he do not spam other threads.
>
> Are you accusing me of being a spammer? Or that Jerry fella?
>
> I don't know about him, but I most certainly am not a spammer, and given
> the severe penalties that accused spammers face, I'm afraid I shall have
> to contemplate taking legal action against anyone who falsely accuses me
> of spamming.

Bla bla bla.

Arne
From: Arne Vajhøj on
Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> In article <h8smok$plj$4(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Dave Searles
> <searles(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk> wrote:
>> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> Dave Searles wrote:
>>>> Lew wrote:
>>>>> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
>>>>>> Get a thicker skin.
>>>>> What does feeding the troll do to further the topic?
>>>> To what troll do you refer? Peter Duniho? Yourself?
>>> You.
>> But I am not a troll.
>
> For what it's worth I personally don't think you are either. I get the
> drift that you like contributing to various threads, in a positive way,
> just like most of us do.

You saw the "[personal attack deleted]" replies ??

Arne