EXPERIMENTAL ARGUMENTS AGAINST SPECIAL RELATIVITY?
in [Physics]
|
From: PD on 20 Aug 2008 12:58 On Aug 20, 10:59 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > posts, again. NoEinstein Sorry, NoEinstein, I respond as I choose and not at your whim. I've already suggested to you how to post your content in such a way that you can control responses. Why you would attempt to exert control where you do not have control is beyond me. If you don't want to banter with me, then STOP DOING IT. If you need me to stop first, because you can't HELP YOURSELF when I say something, that is not my problem. PD
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 20 Aug 2008 18:31 On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinstein(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >On Aug 20, 8:25�am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Aug 19, 9:39�pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >> >> If you do not like the responses to posts you make an open and >> unfettered forum, examine your motives for posting here, knowing full >> well that you leave yourself open to all sorts of responses. It's been >> suggested to you before that you post to a blog where you can control >> the responses you receive. It is a fool's errand to attempt control >> where you don't have it. Examine your motives. >> >> PD- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >Dear PD: My interest in this newsgroup is about new truths in >science, not about getting into strength of personality battles with >you. In the nearly three years that you have replied to what I have >done (never vice versa), you haven't once responded to reason. Your >ego hinges on the "complexity" of the things you purport to >understand. "Where there is complexity in science, errors likely >loom." > >Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true >science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I >can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with >your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my >posts, again. �� NoEinstein �� Diaper is a paid member of the Einsteinian papal guard. He knows nothing about physics. His sole aim is to disrupt constructive scientific discussion and try to postpone the inevitable day when the truth about relativity is exposed and finally accepted by the physics establishment. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm All religion involves selling a nonexistant concept to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.
From: PD on 20 Aug 2008 21:02 On Aug 20, 5:31 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> > wrote: > > > > >On Aug 20, 8:25 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 19, 9:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > >> If you do not like the responses to posts you make an open and > >> unfettered forum, examine your motives for posting here, knowing full > >> well that you leave yourself open to all sorts of responses. It's been > >> suggested to you before that you post to a blog where you can control > >> the responses you receive. It is a fool's errand to attempt control > >> where you don't have it. Examine your motives. > > >> PD- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > >Dear PD: My interest in this newsgroup is about new truths in > >science, not about getting into strength of personality battles with > >you. In the nearly three years that you have replied to what I have > >done (never vice versa), you haven't once responded to reason. Your > >ego hinges on the "complexity" of the things you purport to > >understand. "Where there is complexity in science, errors likely > >loom." > > >Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > >science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > >can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > >your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > >posts, again. NoEinstein > > Diaper is a paid member of the Einsteinian papal guard. He knows nothing about > physics. His sole aim is to disrupt constructive scientific discussion and try > to postpone the inevitable day when the truth about relativity is exposed and > finally accepted by the physics establishment. > Sorry, didn't mean to interrupt the tea party. Please go ahead and continue your conversation. No need to Phtttbbbt passers-by. PD
From: NoEinstein on 21 Aug 2008 15:05 On Aug 20, 12:58 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 20, 10:59 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > > science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > > can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > > your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > > posts, again. NoEinstein > > Sorry, NoEinstein, I respond as I choose and not at your whim. I've > already suggested to you how to post your content in such a way that > you can control responses. Why you would attempt to exert control > where you do not have control is beyond me. > > If you don't want to banter with me, then STOP DOING IT. > > If you need me to stop first, because you can't HELP YOURSELF when I > say something, that is not my problem. > > PD Dear PD: :-} - ~ - - NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 21 Aug 2008 15:07
On Aug 20, 6:31 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> > wrote: > > > > > > >On Aug 20, 8:25 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 19, 9:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > >> If you do not like the responses to posts you make an open and > >> unfettered forum, examine your motives for posting here, knowing full > >> well that you leave yourself open to all sorts of responses. It's been > >> suggested to you before that you post to a blog where you can control > >> the responses you receive. It is a fool's errand to attempt control > >> where you don't have it. Examine your motives. > > >> PD- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > >Dear PD: My interest in this newsgroup is about new truths in > >science, not about getting into strength of personality battles with > >you. In the nearly three years that you have replied to what I have > >done (never vice versa), you haven't once responded to reason. Your > >ego hinges on the "complexity" of the things you purport to > >understand. "Where there is complexity in science, errors likely > >loom." > > >Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > >science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > >can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > >your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > >posts, again. NoEinstein > > Diaper is a paid member of the Einsteinian papal guard. He knows nothing about > physics. His sole aim is to disrupt constructive scientific discussion and try > to postpone the inevitable day when the truth about relativity is exposed and > finally accepted by the physics establishment. > > Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > > All religion involves selling a nonexistant concept to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dear Henri: That one paragraph should be posted on every newsgroup Google has! Thanks! NoEinstein |