EXPERIMENTAL ARGUMENTS AGAINST SPECIAL RELATIVITY?
in [Physics]
|
From: NoEinstein on 22 Aug 2008 20:54 On Aug 21, 3:17 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 21, 2:05 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 20, 12:58 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 20, 10:59 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > > > > science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > > > > can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > > > > your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > > > > posts, again. NoEinstein > > > > Sorry, NoEinstein, I respond as I choose and not at your whim. I've > > > already suggested to you how to post your content in such a way that > > > you can control responses. Why you would attempt to exert control > > > where you do not have control is beyond me. > > > > If you don't want to banter with me, then STOP DOING IT. > > > > If you need me to stop first, because you can't HELP YOURSELF when I > > > say something, that is not my problem. > > > > PD > > > Dear PD: :-} - ~ - - NoEinstein > > See? You can't help yourself. > I'm not going to help you overcome this compulsion. You're going to > have to conquer this demon all by yourself. > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dear PD: I don't need any help for you to do anything. Being involved in pointless banter can't resolve differences. Only objectivity in science can do that. I invite you to take your comments and you compulsions elsewhere. But when you can't, folks should note that I predicted just that. NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 22 Aug 2008 20:56 On Aug 21, 3:45 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 21, 2:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 20, 6:31 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> > > > wrote: > > > > >On Aug 20, 8:25 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Aug 19, 9:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > >> If you do not like the responses to posts you make an open and > > > >> unfettered forum, examine your motives for posting here, knowing full > > > >> well that you leave yourself open to all sorts of responses. It's been > > > >> suggested to you before that you post to a blog where you can control > > > >> the responses you receive. It is a fool's errand to attempt control > > > >> where you don't have it. Examine your motives. > > > > >> PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > >Dear PD: My interest in this newsgroup is about new truths in > > > >science, not about getting into strength of personality battles with > > > >you. In the nearly three years that you have replied to what I have > > > >done (never vice versa), you haven't once responded to reason. Your > > > >ego hinges on the "complexity" of the things you purport to > > > >understand. "Where there is complexity in science, errors likely > > > >loom." > > > > >Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > > > >science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > > > >can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > > > >your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > > > >posts, again. NoEinstein > > > > Diaper is a paid member of the Einsteinian papal guard. He knows nothing about > > > physics. His sole aim is to disrupt constructive scientific discussion and try > > > to postpone the inevitable day when the truth about relativity is exposed and > > > finally accepted by the physics establishment. > > > > Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > > > > All religion involves selling a nonexistant concept to gullible fools.. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Dear Henri: That one paragraph should be posted on every newsgroup > > Google has! Thanks! NoEinstein > > Why would anybody on alt.religion.buddhism care about what Henri > thinks of me? > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - PD: Why not put that question to such group? NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 22 Aug 2008 20:58 On Aug 21, 3:47 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 21, 2:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 20, 9:02 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 20, 5:31 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >On Aug 20, 8:25 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> On Aug 19, 9:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > >> If you do not like the responses to posts you make an open and > > > > >> unfettered forum, examine your motives for posting here, knowing full > > > > >> well that you leave yourself open to all sorts of responses. It's been > > > > >> suggested to you before that you post to a blog where you can control > > > > >> the responses you receive. It is a fool's errand to attempt control > > > > >> where you don't have it. Examine your motives. > > > > > >> PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > > >Dear PD: My interest in this newsgroup is about new truths in > > > > >science, not about getting into strength of personality battles with > > > > >you. In the nearly three years that you have replied to what I have > > > > >done (never vice versa), you haven't once responded to reason. Your > > > > >ego hinges on the "complexity" of the things you purport to > > > > >understand. "Where there is complexity in science, errors likely > > > > >loom." > > > > > >Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > > > > >science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > > > > >can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > > > > >your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > > > > >posts, again. NoEinstein > > > > > Diaper is a paid member of the Einsteinian papal guard. He knows nothing about > > > > physics. His sole aim is to disrupt constructive scientific discussion and try > > > > to postpone the inevitable day when the truth about relativity is exposed and > > > > finally accepted by the physics establishment. > > > > Sorry, didn't mean to interrupt the tea party. Please go ahead and > > > continue your conversation. No need to Phtttbbbt passers-by. > > > > PD- > > > Dear PD: We aren't having a tea party. But if we were, you would be > > an uninvited passerby! NoEinstein > > Well, you see, that's just it. Passers-by don't have to be invited. > Phttttbbbbt! > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - PD: No, but they certainly can be told that they're unwelcome. NoEinstein
From: PD on 23 Aug 2008 11:18 On Aug 22, 7:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Aug 21, 3:17 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 21, 2:05 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Aug 20, 12:58 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 20, 10:59 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > > > > > science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > > > > > can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > > > > > your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > > > > > posts, again. NoEinstein > > > > > Sorry, NoEinstein, I respond as I choose and not at your whim. I've > > > > already suggested to you how to post your content in such a way that > > > > you can control responses. Why you would attempt to exert control > > > > where you do not have control is beyond me. > > > > > If you don't want to banter with me, then STOP DOING IT. > > > > > If you need me to stop first, because you can't HELP YOURSELF when I > > > > say something, that is not my problem. > > > > > PD > > > > Dear PD: :-} - ~ - - NoEinstein > > > See? You can't help yourself. > > I'm not going to help you overcome this compulsion. You're going to > > have to conquer this demon all by yourself. > > > PD > > Dear PD: I don't need any help for you to do anything. Being > involved in pointless banter can't resolve differences. Only > objectivity in science can do that. I invite you to take your > comments and you compulsions elsewhere. But when you can't, folks > should note that I predicted just that. NoEinstein Gee, it's fascinating. Much as you want to resist, you cannot. I toy with you and you beg ("invite") me to stop, over and over and over again. You are subject to my whim. If I choose to release you, I can, by simply acquiescing to your plea to not respond to you. But if I don't so choose, you are enthralled and you find yourself compulsively bound to respond, even if it means projecting your own compulsion on others to try to exert control. You attempt to exert control over responses on a public forum where you BY DEFINITION do not have control. And indeed, you find yourself completely under the control of others, because once you post, you are compelled to respond to every reply, whether you want to or not. And despite your abject slavery, you cannot walk away from posting to this group. You cannot create a free blog, you cannot publish. Instead, the ONLY thing you are capable of doing is posting to a forum that frustrates you, and writing letters to presidents that you know from the outset will be ignored. I don't know why you have this psychological issue, NoEinstein, but I can imagine it's rather crippling and has led to an enormous sense of failure. PD
From: PD on 23 Aug 2008 11:20
On Aug 22, 7:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Aug 21, 3:47 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 21, 2:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > Dear PD: We aren't having a tea party. But if we were, you would be > > > an uninvited passerby! NoEinstein > > > Well, you see, that's just it. Passers-by don't have to be invited. > > Phttttbbbbt! > > > PD- > > PD: No, but they certainly can be told that they're unwelcome. > NoEinstein I can see you as the doorman to a club, standing on the sidewalk and telling pedestrians as they walk by, "Private club! You're not welcome inside! Keep it moving, keep it moving!" PD |