EXPERIMENTAL ARGUMENTS AGAINST SPECIAL RELATIVITY?
in [Physics]
|
From: NoEinstein on 21 Aug 2008 15:09 On Aug 20, 9:02 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 20, 5:31 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> > > wrote: > > > >On Aug 20, 8:25 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Aug 19, 9:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > >> If you do not like the responses to posts you make an open and > > >> unfettered forum, examine your motives for posting here, knowing full > > >> well that you leave yourself open to all sorts of responses. It's been > > >> suggested to you before that you post to a blog where you can control > > >> the responses you receive. It is a fool's errand to attempt control > > >> where you don't have it. Examine your motives. > > > >> PD- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > >Dear PD: My interest in this newsgroup is about new truths in > > >science, not about getting into strength of personality battles with > > >you. In the nearly three years that you have replied to what I have > > >done (never vice versa), you haven't once responded to reason. Your > > >ego hinges on the "complexity" of the things you purport to > > >understand. "Where there is complexity in science, errors likely > > >loom." > > > >Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > > >science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > > >can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > > >your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > > >posts, again. NoEinstein > > > Diaper is a paid member of the Einsteinian papal guard. He knows nothing about > > physics. His sole aim is to disrupt constructive scientific discussion and try > > to postpone the inevitable day when the truth about relativity is exposed and > > finally accepted by the physics establishment. > > Sorry, didn't mean to interrupt the tea party. Please go ahead and > continue your conversation. No need to Phtttbbbt passers-by. > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dear PD: We aren't having a tea party. But if we were, you would be an uninvited passerby! NoEinstein
From: PD on 21 Aug 2008 15:17 On Aug 21, 2:05 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Aug 20, 12:58 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 20, 10:59 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > > > science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > > > can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > > > your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > > > posts, again. NoEinstein > > > Sorry, NoEinstein, I respond as I choose and not at your whim. I've > > already suggested to you how to post your content in such a way that > > you can control responses. Why you would attempt to exert control > > where you do not have control is beyond me. > > > If you don't want to banter with me, then STOP DOING IT. > > > If you need me to stop first, because you can't HELP YOURSELF when I > > say something, that is not my problem. > > > PD > > Dear PD: :-} - ~ - - NoEinstein See? You can't help yourself. I'm not going to help you overcome this compulsion. You're going to have to conquer this demon all by yourself. PD
From: PD on 21 Aug 2008 15:45 On Aug 21, 2:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Aug 20, 6:31 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> > > wrote: > > > >On Aug 20, 8:25 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Aug 19, 9:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > >> If you do not like the responses to posts you make an open and > > >> unfettered forum, examine your motives for posting here, knowing full > > >> well that you leave yourself open to all sorts of responses. It's been > > >> suggested to you before that you post to a blog where you can control > > >> the responses you receive. It is a fool's errand to attempt control > > >> where you don't have it. Examine your motives. > > > >> PD- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > >Dear PD: My interest in this newsgroup is about new truths in > > >science, not about getting into strength of personality battles with > > >you. In the nearly three years that you have replied to what I have > > >done (never vice versa), you haven't once responded to reason. Your > > >ego hinges on the "complexity" of the things you purport to > > >understand. "Where there is complexity in science, errors likely > > >loom." > > > >Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > > >science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > > >can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > > >your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > > >posts, again. NoEinstein > > > Diaper is a paid member of the Einsteinian papal guard. He knows nothing about > > physics. His sole aim is to disrupt constructive scientific discussion and try > > to postpone the inevitable day when the truth about relativity is exposed and > > finally accepted by the physics establishment. > > > Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > > > All religion involves selling a nonexistant concept to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Dear Henri: That one paragraph should be posted on every newsgroup > Google has! Thanks! NoEinstein Why would anybody on alt.religion.buddhism care about what Henri thinks of me? PD
From: PD on 21 Aug 2008 15:47 On Aug 21, 2:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Aug 20, 9:02 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 20, 5:31 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> > > > wrote: > > > > >On Aug 20, 8:25 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Aug 19, 9:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > >> If you do not like the responses to posts you make an open and > > > >> unfettered forum, examine your motives for posting here, knowing full > > > >> well that you leave yourself open to all sorts of responses. It's been > > > >> suggested to you before that you post to a blog where you can control > > > >> the responses you receive. It is a fool's errand to attempt control > > > >> where you don't have it. Examine your motives. > > > > >> PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > >Dear PD: My interest in this newsgroup is about new truths in > > > >science, not about getting into strength of personality battles with > > > >you. In the nearly three years that you have replied to what I have > > > >done (never vice versa), you haven't once responded to reason. Your > > > >ego hinges on the "complexity" of the things you purport to > > > >understand. "Where there is complexity in science, errors likely > > > >loom." > > > > >Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true > > > >science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I > > > >can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with > > > >your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my > > > >posts, again. NoEinstein > > > > Diaper is a paid member of the Einsteinian papal guard. He knows nothing about > > > physics. His sole aim is to disrupt constructive scientific discussion and try > > > to postpone the inevitable day when the truth about relativity is exposed and > > > finally accepted by the physics establishment. > > > Sorry, didn't mean to interrupt the tea party. Please go ahead and > > continue your conversation. No need to Phtttbbbt passers-by. > > > PD- > > Dear PD: We aren't having a tea party. But if we were, you would be > an uninvited passerby! NoEinstein Well, you see, that's just it. Passers-by don't have to be invited. Phttttbbbbt! PD
From: Dirk Van de moortel on 22 Aug 2008 03:58
PD <TheDraperFamily(a)gmail.com> wrote in message 54f33be8-3bb8-46f2-bb6e-6fac3ed72132(a)25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com > On Aug 21, 2:05 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >> On Aug 20, 12:58 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Aug 20, 10:59 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >>>> Your misplaced sense of superiority makes you just a parasite to true >>>> science. Having the last word, isn't the same as being right. I >>>> can't continue to spend hours a week of my time trying to banter with >>>> your "skirting" of science. So, please refrain from replying on my >>>> posts, again. �� NoEinstein �� >> >>> Sorry, NoEinstein, I respond as I choose and not at your whim. I've >>> already suggested to you how to post your content in such a way that >>> you can control responses. Why you would attempt to exert control >>> where you do not have control is beyond me. >> >>> If you don't want to banter with me, then STOP DOING IT. >> >>> If you need me to stop first, because you can't HELP YOURSELF when I >>> say something, that is not my problem. >> >>> PD >> >> Dear PD: :-} - ~ - - �� NoEinstein �� > > See? You can't help yourself. > I'm not going to help you overcome this compulsion. You're going to > have to conquer this demon all by yourself. > > PD It really looks like having the last word is the *only* that matters with NoBrain. Interesting - and amusing :-) Dirk Vdm |