Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 398.0: USA Proves Flexagons Related to Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
Next: The Necessity of an experiment (classical electrodynamics) that should have been done 100 years ago
From: Androcles on 12 Jun 2010 22:26 <paparios(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:71de4796-2677-405d-8935-41433d6303fd(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... | On 12 jun, 18:41, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...(a)mv.com> wrote: | > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, papar...(a)gmail.com wrote: | | Snip for brevity | | You then may want to check yourself the quality of the research of Van | Flandern in his page http://www.metaresearch.org/ | | http://www.metaresearch.org/solar%20system/solar.asp | http://www.metaresearch.org/solar%20system/cydonia/cydonia.asp | | Tom was a member of this group for several years and he had good | discussions with Dr. Carlip and others on the speed of gravity | subject. He even managed to publish some of his ideas in a reputated | physics journal but..... | | Miguel Rios I have a field of grass. There is long tall grass near the gate, higher than an elephant, and short stubby grass in the far corner, shorter than a mouse. The height of grass is inversely proportional to it's distance from the gate. The grass represents the force pulling me toward the gate, a strong force near the gate and a weak force far from the gate. As I walk through the field, what is the speed of the height of grass in "reputated" physics journals, crappy pappy?
From: kenseto on 14 Jun 2010 18:15 On Jun 2, 1:05 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 1, 10:59 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...(a)mv.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Peter Webb wrote: > > > I gather from the context that you believe that Einstein's Special and > > > General Theory of Relativity are wrong. > > > > What do you think of Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect > > > (which was instrumental in thedevelopment of Quantum Mechanics, and for which > > > he earned a Nobel prize), and Einstein's modelling of Brownian motion (which > > > virtually created the whole field of statistical mechanics) ? > > > > Was he wrong about them as well? > > > Was Einstein right or wrong? > > > What we have are two schools of thought: i) Einstein did something, vs. > > ii) a bunch of experts/skeptics who think Einstein made a lot of noise, > > more heat than light, and fooled a lot of people. > > I really don't care much for schools of thought. After all, there is > still a substantial school of thought that the earth is 6600 years > old, but that doesn't mean its existence automatically earns it any > credibility. > > I'm much more interested in understanding WHY those people in the anti- > Einstein school of thought feel that way. > Some candidate ideas: > - The theory is wrong, because it makes no sense to these people, and > these people firmly believe that unless a theory makes sense, it > cannot possibly be considered right. No the theory calls the absolute rest frame as an inertial frame and then turn around and deny the existence of an absolute rest frame. Ken Seto > - The theory is wrong, though it is right by the metrics by which > science judges theories. But this points to the fundamental problem > with how science is done, and this theory being wrong is just a > symptom of that problem. > - The theory is probably right, but the credit is wrongly given to > Einstein, as it properly belongs to other people. > - The theory's correctness is completely uncertain at this point, and > the issue is that scientists insist that it must be accepted as right. > - Even if the theory is right, voice needs to be given to the contrary > proposal with equal weight, for the sake of maintaining debate. > > Which of these represents your position?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: Me, ...again! on 15 Jun 2010 06:40 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, kenseto wrote: > On Jun 2, 1:05 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 1, 10:59 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...(a)mv.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Peter Webb wrote: >>>> I gather from the context that you believe that Einstein's Special and >>>> General Theory of Relativity are wrong. >> >>>> What do you think of Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect >>>> (which was instrumental in thedevelopment of Quantum Mechanics, and for which >>>> he earned a Nobel prize), and Einstein's modelling of Brownian motion (which >>>> virtually created the whole field of statistical mechanics) ? >> >>>> Was he wrong about them as well? >> >>> Was Einstein right or wrong? >> >>> What we have are two schools of thought: i) Einstein did something, vs. >>> ii) a bunch of experts/skeptics who think Einstein made a lot of noise, >>> more heat than light, and fooled a lot of people. >> >> I really don't care much for schools of thought. After all, there is >> still a substantial school of thought that the earth is 6600 years >> old, but that doesn't mean its existence automatically earns it any >> credibility. >> >> I'm much more interested in understanding WHY those people in the anti- >> Einstein school of thought feel that way. >> Some candidate ideas: >> - The theory is wrong, because it makes no sense to these people, and >> these people firmly believe that unless a theory makes sense, it >> cannot possibly be considered right. > > No the theory calls the absolute rest frame as an inertial frame and > then turn around and deny the existence of an absolute rest frame. > > Ken Seto I am just interested to learn that there are more people than I thought who object to Einstein and Relativity. The booklist is larger than I thought.... Was Einstein right or wrong? What we have are two schools of thought: i) Einstein did something, vs. ii) a bunch of experts/skeptics who think Einstein made a lot of noise, more heat than light, and fooled a lot of people. Here, below, are many more books which cast much doubt on Einstein's "contributions"...... (all dug up by searches on Amazon.com under: au=einstein) Note that most of these books were written in the last decade or two. If we do a search going back to the beginnings of SR, GR, then I'm sure there will be found many many dozens of books written by equally smart people who challenge and/or do not accept Einstein. I think it would be foolish to think the story is over, final, and finished. //////////////////////////////////////// Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius [Paperback] Hans C. Ohanian (Author) ================================ Einstein's Greatest Mistake: Abandonment of the Aether by Sid Deutsch ================================================== Questioning Einstein: Is Relativity Necessary? by, Tom Bethell Review.... That a book by a great and established writer like Tom Bethell, who is a long-time science writer and political columnist at The American Spectator, hasn't been officially reviewed yet, says more about those who pose as the intellectual and editorial guardians of literature than it does about the quality of this book or the stature of its author. In fact, it is an engaging, well researched book about one of the most interesting paradigm struggles of the twentieth century (and still ongoing today). That Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (SR) was influenced by and made quickly popular by the relativistic ideologies of its time (1905) seems to this writer a foregone conclusion. But it was the Michelson-Morley experiment that failed to detect a "luminiferous ether," which gave SR scientific credibility. But Michelson himself soon doubted its conclusions and proved it in the later Michelson-Gale experiment which did detect an ether. H. Lorentz, a contemporary of Einstein, and a scientist of equal stature, argued in numerous debates with Einstein that all "relativistic effects" (such as the bending of starlight as it passes near the sun) were the result of light traveling through an "entrained ether" which surrounds and moves with planetary bodies--otherwise known as the gravitational field. Other well-known physicists of the day also doubted the veracity of SR, especially its principle of space-time distortion. A few were: Herbert Dingle, whose "paradox" asked the question of which "clock" would run slow (and thus experience time dilation predicted by SR) of two relativistic travelers; as for example two rocket ships in different inertial frames (i.e., going at different speeds relative to each other). Another physicist, H. Ives, of the famous Ives-Stillwell experiment to test the Doppler effect of fast moving mesons, became a lifelong enemy of Einstein because he felt that his results were being misinterpreted. And there were many others who disagreed with Einstein's fundamental conclusions. Even Einstein himself, as Bethell points out, later in life admitted that forces propagating through empty space without a medium in which they could be conveyed, was a logical absurdity--a fact never mentioned in textbooks, or in other "easy Einstein" books. In the later part of the twentieth century, other scientific critics picked up where Lorentz and his contemporaries had left off. Among them were Tom Van Flandern, Carver Mead, and Petr Beckmann. Bethell concentrates on Beckmann's critique, written in a technical book called Einstein Plus Two, in which the author claims that all the effects of both Special and General Relativity can be explained using classical physics. Bethell brings Beckmann's book down to earth from the arcane heights of Mt. Olympus by rendering Beckmann's mathematical descriptions understandable to the layman. If you are interested in the history of one of the most pivotal scientific ideas of our time, if you have always believed that the world should make sense but would still like to know about the mysteries of relativity, this book may be for you. And this reviewer might add that although Bethell might not know it yet, this may be his most significant book. ===================================================== Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories by Al Kelly review... Al Kelly is right, July 3, 2009 By Alvin D. Heindel "another patent examiner" (USA) - See all my reviews This review is from: Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (Paperback) Al Kelly should be commended for his courage in standing up to the Einsteinian science mafia. The twin paradox proves Einsteinian relativity is impossible. Einstein's theories should be called absolutivity which is another logical contradiction. It was created when scientists believed in the steady state theory of the universe. Now that scientists accept Hubble's big bang theory and the fact that the earth's velocity has been measured relative to the cosmic microwave background radiation left over from the big bang, it shows you can measure an absolute velocity based on Einstein's theories. Also, scientists believe there's nothing outside the event horizon around our universe. This provides us with another means for measuring a velocity relative to a point in space which is an absolute velocity based on Einstein's theories. Obviously, space and aether are infinite and gravity is an aether density gradient, not curved space. Kelly doesn't mention G. BURNISTON BROWN's discussion of the twin paradox in the Bulletin of the Institute of Physics and Physical Society, Vol. 18 (March, 1967) pp. 71--77, easily found on the internet. He provides another good anti-Einstein argument based on the twin paradox. I tend to think H. A. Lorentz's theory might be the best one. Also, Einstein insisted relativity depends on the existence of the aether which is denied by the physics establishment. SRT depends on the existence of the aether, the same way Newtonian relativity depends on the existence of space. In Lorentz's theory, the aether is NOT at absolute rest. A. J. Kox gives a translation of one paragraph from one of Lorentz's articles: 37 It should be emphasized that LORENTZ did not adhere to the idea of absolute space. In LORENTZ (1895) (sect. 2), for instance, he states that it is meaningless to talk about absolute rest of the ether and that the expression 'the ether is at rest' only means that the different parts of the ether do not move with respect to each other (AHESc-1988 pages 67-78). This is given as a reference: 1895 Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern (Leiden: Brill, 1895); repr. in CP, Vol. 5, pp. 1-138. The 1906 reprint can be downloaded from Google books. ======================================================== Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist by Christopher Jon Bjerknes (Paperback - July 2002) ====================================== Einstein's Riddle: Riddles, Paradoxes, and Conundrums to Stretch Your Mind by Jeremy Stangroom (Hardcover - Apr. 28, 2009) ================================================= Reinventing Gravity: A Physicist Goes Beyond Einstein by John W. Moffat (Hardcover - Sept. 30, 2008) ==================================== What Einstein Did Not See: Redefining Time to Understand Space by Thomas W. Sills (Paperback - June 1, 2009) ============================================= Einstein's Greatest Blunder?: The Cosmological Constant and Other Fudge Factors in the Physics of the Universe (Questions of Science) by Donald Goldsmith (Paperback - Oct. 15, 1997) ============================================= Dialog About Objections Against the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein (Paperback - Nov. 12, 2009) ============================================================ The Quantum Theory of Planck, Einstein, Bohr and Sommerfeld: Its Foundation and the Rise of Its Difficulties 1900-1925 1 (The Historical Development of ... and the Rise of Its Difficulties 1900-1925) by Jagdish Mehra and H. Rechenberg (Paperback - Dec. 28, 2000) ====================================== The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers: A Counter-Revolution in Physics by Dean Turner; Richard Hazelett (Paperback - Oct. 1, 2005) ========================================================== Einstein on Trial or Metaphysical Principles of Natural Philosophy by Jorge Cespedes-Cure (Paperback - July 1, 2002) ======================================================= Einstein as Myth and Muse by Alan J. Friedman and Carol C. Donley (Paperback - Apr. 28, 1989) ======================================== Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of Einstein's Theory Of Relativity (Paperback) ~ Kamen George Kamenov (Author), Kamen G. Kamenov (Illustrator 1 of 2 people found the following review helpful: A classic book.!!!, December 4, 2008 By Peter Stone (USA) - See all my reviews This review is from: Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of Einstein's Theory Of Relativity (Paperback) In 1972 the famous British professor Herbert Dingle, an ex-relativist who turned into antirelativist, published a book against relativity titled: Science at the crossroads. Because of that he was gradually removed from the "scientiffic" establishment. Kamen Kamenov's book is one of the books, alongside those of Herbert Dingle, Harald Nordenson and Henri Bergson, highly recommendable to those who really want to understand how incurably flawed and useless the "theory" in question is and why it should be abandoned in its entirety. Some books are hard to find. Look in "bookfinder.com" and read about the above mentionned autors in Wikipedia. 7 of 12 people found the following review helpful: A revolutionary new book !, May 30, 2001 By Robert (Berkeley,California) - See all my reviews This review is from: Space, Time and Matter, and the Falsity of Einstein's Theory of Relativity (Paperback) Provocative and fascinating. Mr. Kamenov provides the clearest possible nonmathematical explanation of the present day understanding of the theory of relativity and then unmistakably disproves it. His logic is undeniable . I think that after reading the book nobody can believe in the validity of the theory of relatvity any longer but quite the opposite is true,the theory is wrong. Mr. Kamenov explains in plain langauge the real nature of relity and offers alternative solution to the theory of relativity. He proves the existence of ether. The book deals not only with theory of relativity but also with the philosophy of space, time and physical matter and explains in a plain , nonmathematical way the nature of electricity , magnetism and gravitation. This book is realy easy to understand but it requires an abstract thinking . It is a great exercise for the mind and Mr. Kamenov is a great mind. I read the book several times and every time it was even more interesting. I could not stop reading it. I believe that this book will revolutionize the modern science. It is a real treasure. ============================= Einstein, the Aether & Variable Rest Mass (Paperback) ~ Jack Heighway (Author) ================================= Einstein's Relativity Theory: Correct, Paradoxical, and Wrong by Lyubomir, T. Gruyitch (Hardcover - Dec. 6, 2006) ////////////////////////////////////////////////// ///////////////////////////////////// >> - The theory is wrong, though it is right by the metrics by which >> science judges theories. But this points to the fundamental problem >> with how science is done, and this theory being wrong is just a >> symptom of that problem. >> - The theory is probably right, but the credit is wrongly given to >> Einstein, as it properly belongs to other people. >> - The theory's correctness is completely uncertain at this point, and >> the issue is that scientists insist that it must be accepted as right. >> - Even if the theory is right, voice needs to be given to the contrary >> proposal with equal weight, for the sake of maintaining debate. >> >> Which of these represents your position?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >
From: paparios on 15 Jun 2010 09:36 On 15 jun, 08:28, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > I am just interested to learn that there are more people than I thought > who object to Einstein and Relativity. The booklist is larger than I > thought.... > > ___________________________________ > Its all relative. How do books claiming that Einstein's special theory of > relativity is wrong compare in number to those which claim that angels are > real, or that Atlantis existed, or that people of earth will be reborn in a > rapture? > > Idiot. I would trust more on the 5654 books on Amazon that teach relativity. Among them: -General Relativity by Robert M. Wald -Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity by Sean M. Carroll -Gravitation (Physics Series) by Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, John Archibald Wheeler, and John Wheeler -General Relativity from A to B by Robert Geroch -Six Not-So-Easy Pieces: Einstein's Relativity, Symmetry, And Space- Time by Richard P. Feynman -Exploring Black Holes: Introduction to General Relativity by Edwin F. Taylor and John Archibald Wheeler -The Classical Theory of Fields, Fourth Edition: Volume 2 (Course of Theoretical Physics Series) by L. D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz Miguel Rios
From: Me, ...again! on 15 Jun 2010 11:31
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, paparios(a)gmail.com wrote: > On 15 jun, 08:28, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> > wrote: >> I am just interested to learn that there are more people than I thought >> who object to Einstein and Relativity. The booklist is larger than I >> thought.... >> >> ___________________________________ >> Its all relative. How do books claiming that Einstein's special theory of >> relativity is wrong compare in number to those which claim that angels are >> real, or that Atlantis existed, or that people of earth will be reborn in a >> rapture? >> >> Idiot. > > I would trust more on the 5654 books on Amazon that teach relativity. > Among them: > > -General Relativity by Robert M. Wald > -Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity by Sean > M. Carroll > -Gravitation (Physics Series) by Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, > John Archibald Wheeler, and John Wheeler > -General Relativity from A to B by Robert Geroch > -Six Not-So-Easy Pieces: Einstein's Relativity, Symmetry, And Space- > Time by Richard P. Feynman > -Exploring Black Holes: Introduction to General Relativity by Edwin F. > Taylor and John Archibald Wheeler > -The Classical Theory of Fields, Fourth Edition: Volume 2 (Course of > Theoretical Physics Series) by L. D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz > > Miguel Rios > Among my list of "doubter" books (see below) is actully one by Einstein himself... The title/author is located very near the bottom, and I put a row of "X" both before and after that entry. I hope more people realize I was including a "real expert" who appeared, based on the title, to be trying to respond--as an expert--to those who had _objections_. I was even thinking about buying that book and reading it over any of the other books. -----------------original list, below------- Was Einstein right or wrong? What we have are two schools of thought: i) Einstein did something, vs. ii) a bunch of experts/skeptics who think Einstein made a lot of noise, more heat than light, and fooled a lot of people. Here, below, are many more books which cast much doubt on Einstein's "contributions"...... (all dug up by searches on Amazon.com under: au=einstein) Note that most of these books were written in the last decade or two. If we do a search going back to the beginnings of SR, GR, then I'm sure there will be found many many dozens of books written by equally smart people who challenge and/or do not accept Einstein. I think it would be foolish to think the story is over, final, and finished. //////////////////////////////////////// Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius [Paperback] Hans C. Ohanian (Author) ================================ Einstein's Greatest Mistake: Abandonment of the Aether by Sid Deutsch ================================================== Questioning Einstein: Is Relativity Necessary? by, Tom Bethell Review.... That a book by a great and established writer like Tom Bethell, who is a long-time science writer and political columnist at The American Spectator, hasn't been officially reviewed yet, says more about those who pose as the intellectual and editorial guardians of literature than it does about the quality of this book or the stature of its author. In fact, it is an engaging, well researched book about one of the most interesting paradigm struggles of the twentieth century (and still ongoing today). That Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (SR) was influenced by and made quickly popular by the relativistic ideologies of its time (1905) seems to this writer a foregone conclusion. But it was the Michelson-Morley experiment that failed to detect a "luminiferous ether," which gave SR scientific credibility. But Michelson himself soon doubted its conclusions and proved it in the later Michelson-Gale experiment which did detect an ether. H. Lorentz, a contemporary of Einstein, and a scientist of equal stature, argued in numerous debates with Einstein that all "relativistic effects" (such as the bending of starlight as it passes near the sun) were the result of light traveling through an "entrained ether" which surrounds and moves with planetary bodies--otherwise known as the gravitational field. Other well-known physicists of the day also doubted the veracity of SR, especially its principle of space-time distortion. A few were: Herbert Dingle, whose "paradox" asked the question of which "clock" would run slow (and thus experience time dilation predicted by SR) of two relativistic travelers; as for example two rocket ships in different inertial frames (i.e., going at different speeds relative to each other). Another physicist, H. Ives, of the famous Ives-Stillwell experiment to test the Doppler effect of fast moving mesons, became a lifelong enemy of Einstein because he felt that his results were being misinterpreted. And there were many others who disagreed with Einstein's fundamental conclusions. Even Einstein himself, as Bethell points out, later in life admitted that forces propagating through empty space without a medium in which they could be conveyed, was a logical absurdity--a fact never mentioned in textbooks, or in other "easy Einstein" books. In the later part of the twentieth century, other scientific critics picked up where Lorentz and his contemporaries had left off. Among them were Tom Van Flandern, Carver Mead, and Petr Beckmann. Bethell concentrates on Beckmann's critique, written in a technical book called Einstein Plus Two, in which the author claims that all the effects of both Special and General Relativity can be explained using classical physics. Bethell brings Beckmann's book down to earth from the arcane heights of Mt. Olympus by rendering Beckmann's mathematical descriptions understandable to the layman. If you are interested in the history of one of the most pivotal scientific ideas of our time, if you have always believed that the world should make sense but would still like to know about the mysteries of relativity, this book may be for you. And this reviewer might add that although Bethell might not know it yet, this may be his most significant book. ===================================================== Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories by Al Kelly review... Al Kelly is right, July 3, 2009 By Alvin D. Heindel "another patent examiner" (USA) - See all my reviews This review is from: Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (Paperback) Al Kelly should be commended for his courage in standing up to the Einsteinian science mafia. The twin paradox proves Einsteinian relativity is impossible. Einstein's theories should be called absolutivity which is another logical contradiction. It was created when scientists believed in the steady state theory of the universe. Now that scientists accept Hubble's big bang theory and the fact that the earth's velocity has been measured relative to the cosmic microwave background radiation left over from the big bang, it shows you can measure an absolute velocity based on Einstein's theories. Also, scientists believe there's nothing outside the event horizon around our universe. This provides us with another means for measuring a velocity relative to a point in space which is an absolute velocity based on Einstein's theories. Obviously, space and aether are infinite and gravity is an aether density gradient, not curved space. Kelly doesn't mention G. BURNISTON BROWN's discussion of the twin paradox in the Bulletin of the Institute of Physics and Physical Society, Vol. 18 (March, 1967) pp. 71--77, easily found on the internet. He provides another good anti-Einstein argument based on the twin paradox. I tend to think H. A. Lorentz's theory might be the best one. Also, Einstein insisted relativity depends on the existence of the aether which is denied by the physics establishment. SRT depends on the existence of the aether, the same way Newtonian relativity depends on the existence of space. In Lorentz's theory, the aether is NOT at absolute rest. A. J. Kox gives a translation of one paragraph from one of Lorentz's articles: 37 It should be emphasized that LORENTZ did not adhere to the idea of absolute space. In LORENTZ (1895) (sect. 2), for instance, he states that it is meaningless to talk about absolute rest of the ether and that the expression 'the ether is at rest' only means that the different parts of the ether do not move with respect to each other (AHESc-1988 pages 67-78). This is given as a reference: 1895 Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern (Leiden: Brill, 1895); repr. in CP, Vol. 5, pp. 1-138. The 1906 reprint can be downloaded from Google books. ======================================================== Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist by Christopher Jon Bjerknes (Paperback - July 2002) ====================================== Einstein's Riddle: Riddles, Paradoxes, and Conundrums to Stretch Your Mind by Jeremy Stangroom (Hardcover - Apr. 28, 2009) ================================================= Reinventing Gravity: A Physicist Goes Beyond Einstein by John W. Moffat (Hardcover - Sept. 30, 2008) ==================================== What Einstein Did Not See: Redefining Time to Understand Space by Thomas W. Sills (Paperback - June 1, 2009) ============================================= Einstein's Greatest Blunder?: The Cosmological Constant and Other Fudge Factors in the Physics of the Universe (Questions of Science) by Donald Goldsmith (Paperback - Oct. 15, 1997) ============================================= XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Dialog About Objections Against the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein (Paperback - Nov. 12, 2009) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ============================================================ The Quantum Theory of Planck, Einstein, Bohr and Sommerfeld: Its Foundation and the Rise of Its Difficulties 1900-1925 1 (The Historical Development of ... and the Rise of Its Difficulties 1900-1925) by Jagdish Mehra and H. Rechenberg (Paperback - Dec. 28, 2000) ====================================== The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers: A Counter-Revolution in Physics by Dean Turner; Richard Hazelett (Paperback - Oct. 1, 2005) ========================================================== Einstein on Trial or Metaphysical Principles of Natural Philosophy by Jorge Cespedes-Cure (Paperback - July 1, 2002) ======================================================= Einstein as Myth and Muse by Alan J. Friedman and Carol C. Donley (Paperback - Apr. 28, 1989) ======================================== Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of Einstein's Theory Of Relativity (Paperback) ~ Kamen George Kamenov (Author), Kamen G. Kamenov (Illustrator 1 of 2 people found the following review helpful: A classic book.!!!, December 4, 2008 By Peter Stone (USA) - See all my reviews This review is from: Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of Einstein's Theory Of Relativity (Paperback) In 1972 the famous British professor Herbert Dingle, an ex-relativist who turned into antirelativist, published a book against relativity titled: Science at the crossroads. Because of that he was gradually removed from the "scientiffic" establishment. Kamen Kamenov's book is one of the books, alongside those of Herbert Dingle, Harald Nordenson and Henri Bergson, highly recommendable to those who really want to understand how incurably flawed and useless the "theory" in question is and why it should be abandoned in its entirety. Some books are hard to find. Look in "bookfinder.com" and read about the above mentionned autors in Wikipedia. 7 of 12 people found the following review helpful: A revolutionary new book !, May 30, 2001 By Robert (Berkeley,California) - See all my reviews This review is from: Space, Time and Matter, and the Falsity of Einstein's Theory of Relativity (Paperback) Provocative and fascinating. Mr. Kamenov provides the clearest possible nonmathematical explanation of the present day understanding of the theory of relativity and then unmistakably disproves it. His logic is undeniable . I think that after reading the book nobody can believe in the validity of the theory of relatvity any longer but quite the opposite is true,the theory is wrong. Mr. Kamenov explains in plain langauge the real nature of relity and offers alternative solution to the theory of relativity. He proves the existence of ether. The book deals not only with theory of relativity but also with the philosophy of space, time and physical matter and explains in a plain , nonmathematical way the nature of electricity , magnetism and gravitation. This book is realy easy to understand but it requires an abstract thinking . It is a great exercise for the mind and Mr. Kamenov is a great mind. I read the book several times and every time it was even more interesting. I could not stop reading it. I believe that this book will revolutionize the modern science. It is a real treasure. ============================= Einstein, the Aether & Variable Rest Mass (Paperback) ~ Jack Heighway (Author) ================================= Einstein's Relativity Theory: Correct, Paradoxical, and Wrong by Lyubomir, T. Gruyitch (Hardcover - Dec. 6, 2006) ////////////////////////////////////////////////// ///////////////////////////////////// |