From: Jennifer Usher on


"Michelle Steiner" <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote in message
news:michelle-5DEFC7.14490205052010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi...
> In article <4be1e417$0$5251$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com>,
> "Jennifer Usher" <jennisuzan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> > Yes in a context relevant to FTL travel - check the references
>> >> > listed in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive for warp
>> >> > bubbles applied to FTL travel.
>> >>
>> >> Eh, he just stole the idea from Zefram Cochrane. ;-)
>> >
>> > That's pretty good, considering that he will probably die before
>> > Cochrane will be born. Time travel, anyone?
>>
>> Maybe he is friends with the Doctor.
>
> Doctor Who?

Of course.

--
Jennifer Usher

From: Wes Groleau on
On 05-05-2010 03:20, JF Mezei wrote:
> Wes Groleau wrote:
>> If a 32-bit integer's bytes are stored (ascending addresses)
>> DEADBEEF on Intel and EFBEADDE on 68000, the VAX would store
>> them ADDEEFBE or EFBEADBE. I forget which of those two it was,
>> but I well remember the trouble it caused me in trying to accomplish
>> certain tasks on the VAX in 1986-1988.
>
> VAX is little endian just like the intel 32 bit X86. First byte contains
> lowest order byte. You may be refering to different format of
> hexadecimal memory dump between different operating systems.

I was there. To accomplish a long-forgotten goal, I overlaid a
four-byte integer on a four-character string. The second and third
characters were NOT in the order of the first and last.

--
Wes Groleau

Some schools are cutting back on homework …
http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/russell?itemid=1508
From: Mensanator on
On May 5, 5:52 pm, "Charlie Gibbs" <cgi...(a)kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
> In article <qNSdnVP8Qo-IAnzWnZ2dnUVZ_uydn...(a)earthlink.com>,
>
> magicon...(a)earthlink.net (Paul Magnussen) writes:
> > Michelle Steiner wrote:
>
> >> In the Lensmen (or maybe the Skylark) series, FTL was
> >> accomplished by negating inertia, resulting in an inertialess drive.
> >> However, when regaining inertia, the ship (or other object) had its
> >> intrinsic velocity that it had at the moment it went inertialess.
>
> > It was the Lensman series, but the trick was to neutralize inertia,
> > not negate it.  The Boskonians apparently once attempted to negate
> > inertia by overdriving a Bergenholm, but even Kinnison couldn't
> > understand why :-)
>
> I just finished reading a story in the latest Analog where the
> protagonist is driving a car being chased by a flying saucer.
> As the saucer got close enough, its inertia-neutralizing field
> enveloped the car, so our hero hit the brakes and came to an
> instantaneous stop, causing the saucer to fly right past.  What
> was even more fun was that he then fired at the saucer with a
> handgun; the bullet hit the saucer, which being inertialess was
> flicked off into the distance.

If the car got caught in the "inertia-neutralizing field", how
come the bullet didn't?

>
> --
> /~\  cgi...(a)kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
> \ /  I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
>  X   Top-posted messages will probably be ignored.  See RFC1855.
> / \  HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored.  Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!

From: Joe Pfeiffer on
DRAMA QUEEN <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> writes:

> On 05-05-2010 13:17, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>> Every time I try to eat one of those long yellow fruit
>> I get a floating-point exception.
>>
>> ba + (na)^2
>
> Standard Usenet nitpicking:
> Why is one syllable added and the others multiplied?

So ba(na)^2 would be slightly better.
--
As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should
be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours;
and this we should do freely and generously. (Benjamin Franklin)
From: Joe Pfeiffer on
Wes Groleau <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> writes:

> On 05-05-2010 03:20, JF Mezei wrote:
>> Wes Groleau wrote:
>>> If a 32-bit integer's bytes are stored (ascending addresses)
>>> DEADBEEF on Intel and EFBEADDE on 68000, the VAX would store
>>> them ADDEEFBE or EFBEADBE. I forget which of those two it was,
>>> but I well remember the trouble it caused me in trying to accomplish
>>> certain tasks on the VAX in 1986-1988.
>>
>> VAX is little endian just like the intel 32 bit X86. First byte contains
>> lowest order byte. You may be refering to different format of
>> hexadecimal memory dump between different operating systems.
>
> I was there. To accomplish a long-forgotten goal, I overlaid a
> four-byte integer on a four-character string. The second and third
> characters were NOT in the order of the first and last.

Either you mis-diagnosed what you were seeing, or you are
mis-remembering.
--
As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should
be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours;
and this we should do freely and generously. (Benjamin Franklin)