Fermat's Last theorem short proof
in [Math]
|
From: bassam king karzeddin on 27 Apr 2007 11:25 > > If (M) is positive square free number>=1, (C) is > > positive integer, then, ANY positive integer (E), > can > > be expressed as the following well known equation > > E = M*C^2 > > That is true indeed! You can even remove the > assumption that M is a square free number and that C > is positive: take C=1 or C=-1. When the ISSUE is FLT, I tend to limit the generalization Yes, and obviously, (C) can be non-zero integer, but I didn't get your note about (M) not neccesarliy to be a square free number, How is that possible? I'm afraid Can you provide counter example please Thanking your note B.Karzeddin
From: Tonico on 27 Apr 2007 16:39 On Apr 27, 9:59 pm, bassam king karzeddin <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > I never claimed, nor anyone that I can think of, that > > I am the only > > mathematician, or that only I am a mathematician. > > You're claim that any positive integer (what in maths > > is sometimes > > called a natural number) E can be expressed as > > m*c^2, for m square > > free and C positive integer is awesome! I wonder > > whether you are the > > one that also discovered that doors serve the same to > > go out AND to go > > in, or that one can go up stairs and ON THE SAME > > stair also go > > down...! > > If you were, I wonder how come you haven't yet > > received the Nobel > > Prize > > Regards > > Tonio > > I told you Tonio, > it is a Joke only and still you can't play with, let us see something of yours other than non-mathematics > > About Nobel Prize, > Do you think it is opened for any one? > Fermat himself and many many didn't, so what? > > Regards > B.Karzeddin- *************************************************************** Hmmm...seems like your joking skills are well in accordance with your mathematical ones. Anyway, there is no Nobel Prize in maths...:>) Regards Tonio
From: sonnenrain17 on 28 Apr 2007 02:14 Use M=E, C=1.
From: bassam king karzeddin on 28 Apr 2007 05:58 > Use M=E, C=1. Of course, if you want to play it freely, yes you will make it meaning less, there is also generalization to make E as any integer by choosing (C) as a multiple of complex number Sqrt(-1), but remember that the main issue is FLT where QUASI said " At least one of the prime factors of (x^n+y^n) with at most exponent equal to two", where this is only a rigorous proof to FLT, as I might show you later That is why I do insist that (M) is square free number, now it is quite easy for mathematicians to study Einstein's Equation in there little details, that is when gcd(M,C) = K, when (M=C) when (M=1), or (C=1), ...etc Regards B.Karzeddin
From: bassam king karzeddin on 28 Apr 2007 07:18
> On Apr 27, 9:59 pm, bassam king karzeddin > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > > I never claimed, nor anyone that I can think of, > that > > > I am the only > > > mathematician, or that only I am a mathematician. > > > You're claim that any positive integer (what in > maths > > > is sometimes > > > called a natural number) E can be expressed as > > > m*c^2, for m square > > > free and C positive integer is awesome! I wonder > > > whether you are the > > > one that also discovered that doors serve the > same to > > > go out AND to go > > > in, or that one can go up stairs and ON THE SAME > > > stair also go > > > down...! > > > If you were, I wonder how come you haven't yet > > > received the Nobel > > > Prize > > > Regards > > > Tonio > > > > I told you Tonio, > > it is a Joke only and still you can't play with, > let us see something of yours other than > non-mathematics > > > > About Nobel Prize, > > Do you think it is opened for any one? > > Fermat himself and many many didn't, so what? > > > > Regards > > B.Karzeddin- > ****************************************************** > ********* > Hmmm...seems like your joking skills are well in > accordance with your > mathematical ones. > Anyway, there is no Nobel Prize in maths...:>) > Regards > Tonio > Of course there are NO Nobel prizes for MATHEMATICIANS, and there SHOULDN'T BE, There are few branches of MY mathematics HERE in this thread remained UNVEILED, UNTOUCHED, they are NOT only CONJECTURES but also FORMULAS, they will act like FATAL WEAPONS whenever I decide to announce MY FIRST WORLD WAR AGAINST mathematicians, but not in the TERRORISTS UGLY WAY, and where I shall defeat the DEVILS, with the help of the QUEEN'S TRUE SONS, Mathematicians are expert at finding ERRORS, but they are NOT at all at finding the TRUTH, and if they do SECRETLY, they will go the other way, because they STUPIDLY think (who are MOMENTARY or only a FLASH) they only can THINK, but the PERPETUAL facts themselves CAN'T,.... they will trace your footprint no matter where you do hide ...in any place. In any centaury, only with their simple operation = = = . CONJECTURERS CAN ONLY BEAT THE NUMBERS Regards Bassam Karzeddin |