Fermat's Last theorem short proof
in [Math]
|
From: bassam king karzeddin on 24 May 2007 03:52 > On May 22, 7:41 am, bassam king karzeddin > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > <snip> > > > Hey Harris, I bet you picked your new pseudonym > "bassam king ..." as a > play on "assing king". Conscious choice, or > subconscious Freudian > slip? Or is that what Quinn affectionately calls > you? > > > So, you are not convinced even the real James Harries comes here to tell you that, not only those many same reply but also a post with unsuitable words.. I really don't have time for that as to prepare my self to launch my SECOND WORLD WAR AGAINST mathematicians EVERY WHERE on the planet, Where my strategy will be based on shooting some equations, formulas, and conjectures.. etc, and the mathematicians are asked therefore (as there last chance) to release and announce immediately every thing they conclude and knew secretly and think it is new but still can not make use of it, and that is only for the sake of the Queen's librations, since there is no point or guarantee that will not die with them for only a narrow purpose and selfishness. Only then they don't have the right to claim it when it is published here and announced before their eyes AND THE journals WILL BE PUZZLED and get fed up with the many short proofs for their UNSOLVED PROBLEMS suddenly at a time, where the mathematical minds will be collapsed for their own bad heritage and a new era of the human history will begin where also no place for the FOOT and... etc to be replaced by the HEAD and the QUEEN'S FACE WILL SMILE AGAIN WHEN THE RULES WILL BE DOOMED TO DEATH Regards Bassam Karzeddin
From: bassam king karzeddin on 24 May 2007 03:57 > On May 22, 7:41 am, bassam king karzeddin > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > <snip> > > neilist wrote > Hey Harris, I bet you picked your new pseudonym > "bassam king ..." as a > play on "assing king". Conscious choice, or > subconscious Freudian > slip? Or is that what Quinn affectionately calls > you? > > > So, you are not convinced even the real James Harries comes here to tell you that, not only those many same reply but also a post with unsuitable words.. I really don't have time for that as to prepare my self to launch my SECOND WORLD WAR AGAINST mathematicians EVERY WHERE on the planet, Where my strategy will be based on shooting some equations, formulas, and conjectures.. etc, and the mathematicians are asked therefore (as there last chance) to release and announce immediately every thing they conclude and knew secretly and think it is new but still can not make use of it, and that is only for the sake of the Queen's librations, since there is no point or guarantee that will not die with them for only a narrow purpose and selfishness. Only then they don't have the right to claim it when it is published here and announced before their eyes AND THE journals WILL BE PUZZLED and get fed up with the many short proofs for their UNSOLVED PROBLEMS suddenly at a time, where the mathematical minds will be collapsed for their own bad heritage and a new era of the human history will begin where also no place for the FOOT and... etc to be replaced by the HEAD and the QUEEN'S FACE WILL SMILE AGAIN WHEN THE RULES WILL BE DOOMED TO DEATH Regards Bassam Karzeddin
From: Tonico on 24 May 2007 08:18 On May 24, 2:57 pm, bassam king karzeddin <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > On May 22, 7:41 am, bassam king karzeddin > > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > <snip> > > neilist wrote > > > Hey Harris, I bet you picked your new pseudonym > > "bassam king ..." as a > > play on "assing king". Conscious choice, or > > subconscious Freudian > > slip? Or is that what Quinn affectionately calls > > you? > > So, you are not convinced even the real James Harries comes here to tell you that, not only those many same reply but also a post with unsuitable words.. > > I really don't have time for that as to prepare my self to launch my > > SECOND WORLD WAR AGAINST mathematicians EVERY WHERE on the planet, > Where my strategy will be based on shooting some equations, formulas, and conjectures.. etc, and the mathematicians are asked therefore (as there last chance) to release and announce immediately every thing they conclude and knew secretly and think it is new but still can not make use of it, and that is only for the sake of the Queen's librations, since there is no point or guarantee that will not die with them for only a narrow purpose and selfishness. > Only then they don't have the right to claim it when it is published here and announced before their eyes > > AND THE journals WILL BE PUZZLED and get fed up with the many short proofs for their UNSOLVED PROBLEMS suddenly at a time, where the mathematical minds will be collapsed for their own bad heritage and a new era of the human history will begin where also no place for the FOOT and... etc to be replaced by the HEAD and the > QUEEN'S FACE WILL SMILE AGAIN WHEN THE RULES WILL BE DOOMED TO DEATH > > Regards > Bassam Karzeddin **************************************************************** Hmm....isn't wine forbidden in islam? Odd. Tonio
From: bassam king karzeddin on 24 May 2007 05:04 > On Thu, 24 May 2007 06:57:20 -0500, quasi > <quasi(a)null.set> wrote: > > >On Thu, 24 May 2007 06:00:36 EDT, bassam king > karzeddin > ><bassam(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > >>> In article > >>> > <24975251.1176279446561.JavaMail.jakarta(a)nitrogen.math > >>> forum.org>, > >>> bassam king karzeddin <bassam(a)ahu.edu.jo> writes: > >>> >... > >>> > > >(x, y, z) are three (none zero) co prime > >>> integers? > >>> > > > > >>> > > >Assuming a counter example (x, y, z) exists > such > >>> > > that (x^p+y^p+z^p=0) > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >(x+y+z)^p =p* (x+y)*(x+z)*(y+z)*N (x, y, z) > >>> > > > > >>> > > >CASE-1 > >>> > > >If (p=3) implies N (x, y, z) = 1, so we > have > >>> > > > > >>> > > >(x+y+z)^3 =3* (x+y)*(x+z)*(y+z) > >>> > > > > >>> *****> > >Assuming (3) does not divide (x*y*z), > then > >>> it does > >>> *****> > >not divide (x+y)*(x+z)*(y+z), > >>> > > >So the above equation does not have solution > > >>> > > >(That is by dividing both sides by 3, you > get 9 > >>> > > times an integer equal to an integer which is > not > >>> > > divisible by 3, which of course is impossible > >>> > > >I think proof is completed for (p=3, and 3 > is > >>> not a > >>> > > factor of (x*y*z) > >>> >... > >>> > >>> The gap in the argument is in the marked lines. > For > >>> instance, > >>> 3 does not divide 1*2*7, but it does divide > >>> (1+2)*(1+7)*(2+7). > >>> > >>> > >>> William C. Waterhouse > >>> Penn State > >>> > >>I noticed your reply today only, and really > speaking I didnt get the wisdom of your reply > separately > >>I wonder also if you realize that the issue is > about FLT, where I have made it very clear in my > original thread that for assumed counter example (x, > y, z) must form a triangle, where also mentioned for > a counter example to be considered the following > inequality must hold true always: > >> > >>Sqrt (x^2+y^2) > z > Sqrt (x^2+y^2-x*y) > >> > >>Which also means that the angle opposing the larger > side (z) must be between (60, 90) degrees > > > >3 does not divide 4*7*8, but it does divide > (4+7)*(4+8)*(7+8). > > I withdraw the above example. > > It's not applicable in the context of the problem. > > Assuming the equation > > (x+y+z)^3 =3*(x+y)*(x+z)*(y+z) > > you are definitely correct in your statement that if > 3 does not divide > x*y*z then 3 does not divide (x+y)*(x+z)*(y+z). > > So yes, you can prove FLT for p=3, case 1, but that's > the absolute > easiest case. What about p=3, case 2? > > quasi Think about this simple equation, and then every thing may come so easily quasi: If (x, y, z) are assumed counter example to the FLT with already given definitions previously, Then the following integer equation doesn't have any solution in the whole positive integer numbers (x+y-z)^n / (z-x)*(z-y) Where (n) is positive integer >2, And the inequality z>(x+y-z)>0 My Regards Bassam Karzeddin Al Hussein bin Talal University JORDAN
From: bassam king karzeddin on 24 May 2007 05:19
> On May 24, 2:57 pm, bassam king karzeddin > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > On May 22, 7:41 am, bassam king karzeddin > > > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > neilist wrote > > > > > Hey Harris, I bet you picked your new pseudonym > > > "bassam king ..." as a > > > play on "assing king". Conscious choice, or > > > subconscious Freudian > > > slip? Or is that what Quinn affectionately calls > > > you? > > > > So, you are not convinced even the real James > Harries comes here to tell you that, not only those > many same reply but also a post with unsuitable > words.. > > > > I really don't have time for that as to prepare my > self to launch my > > > > SECOND WORLD WAR AGAINST mathematicians EVERY WHERE > on the planet, > > Where my strategy will be based on shooting some > equations, formulas, and conjectures.. etc, and the > mathematicians are asked therefore (as there last > chance) to release and announce immediately every > thing they conclude and knew secretly and think it is > new but still can not make use of it, and that is > only for the sake of the Queen's librations, since > there is no point or guarantee that will not die with > them for only a narrow purpose and selfishness. > > Only then they don't have the right to claim it > when it is published here and announced before their > eyes > > > > AND THE journals WILL BE PUZZLED and get fed up > with the many short proofs for their UNSOLVED > PROBLEMS suddenly at a time, where the mathematical > minds will be collapsed for their own bad heritage > and a new era of the human history will begin where > also no place for the FOOT and... etc to be replaced > by the HEAD and the > > QUEEN'S FACE WILL SMILE AGAIN WHEN THE RULES WILL > BE DOOMED TO DEATH > > > > Regards > > Bassam Karzeddin > ****************************************************** > ********** > Hmm....isn't wine forbidden in islam? Odd. > Tonio > Yes, but it is not forbidden in MATHEMATICS And I don't get your point of changing the subject previously to ARABS and here to ISLAM It's all irrelevent to the issue of maths. B.Karzeddin |