Fermat's Last theorem short proof
in [Math]
|
From: neilist on 22 May 2007 13:30 On May 22, 7:41 am, bassam king karzeddin <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: <snip> Hey, Harris, I bet you picked your new pseudonym "bassam king ..." as a play on "assing king". Conscious choice, or subconscious Freudian slip? Or is that what Quinn calls you?
From: neilist on 22 May 2007 14:50 On May 22, 7:41 am, bassam king karzeddin <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > On May 21, 11:07 am, bassam king karzeddin > > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > > On May 11, 5:53 am, bassam king karzeddin > > > > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > > > > On 9 Mai, 17:16, bassam king karzeddin > > > > > > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > > > > > > >What I had been working for many years > > was > > > > about > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > most >general theorem...: > > > > > > > > >For any triangle of positive, distinct, > > > > INTEGER > > > > > > > > SIDES > > > > > > > > >(L>M>S), there exists a positive real > > number > > > > > > (P>=1), > > > > > > > > such >that the following equation holds > > true > > > > > > always > > > > > > > > >S^P + M^P = L^P > > > > > > > > > Your "theorem" is a first year (may be > > first > > > > > > month) > > > > > > > > calculus exercise: > > > > > > > > Assume 0<r,s<1. Prove that > > > > > > > > f(x)=r^x+s^x-1 > > > > > > > > has a (unique) positive root. > > > > > > > > Proof: lim_x=0+ f(x)=1, lim_x=+infinity > > > > f(x)=-1. > > > > > > By > > > > > > > > continuity there is p in ]0,inf[ such > > that > > > > > > f(p)=0. > > > > > > > > Uniqueness (hint): Prove that f'(x)<0. > > > > > > > > By the way > > > > > > > > Did they teach you HOW to find P rather > > than > > > > it's > > > > > > existence only? > > > > > > > Or is there a direct formula for P? > > > > > > > > Can you imagine how the world will change > > > > > > immeadiatly if a direct formula for P is > > > > obtained? > > > > > > > Yes: Not at all > > > > > > Indeed, Not at all.... > > > > > > Regards > > > > > B.Karzeddin- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Hey, James Harris, you're back! Still crazy as > > ever! > > > > > Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha > > > > It seems that James Harris is not only dominating > > the sci.math issues but also casing a nightmares to > > the newborn here > > > > No Sir > > > > I'm not J.S, and it is up to you to deduce wrongly > > > > You may ask your teachers, or teachers of your > > teachers why they can't get in to defend their > > mathematics and I didn't expect to win my first war > > so easily, it is really a tasteless victory > > > > Indeed, MATHEMATICS IS TOO DIFFICULT FOR > > mathematicians > > > > Bassam Karzedd- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Ha ha ha, funny references to personal wars and > > aspersions on > > mathematicians. You haven't changed at all. > > > I'm sure you are still enjoying the "pleasurable > > company" of Quinn > > Tyler Jackson, your comrade in "arms". > > It seems that you don't believe me, or may be you are just plying around safely since no real identity is required here and that is really too bad, > > Or may be others are pushing you for their own purpose, but apart from that I can tell you that I can set you a better world, where university degrees are not required, only internet performance is required, where it will make your life much more meaningful, > > I also can answer many of your questions here but alas if time is available, so I shall ply it coolly and the changes must happen as you may notice from the many threads and news after my threads and threats indirectly, because it is the habits of your grand mathematicians all over the history to make stories, and no wonder if you will hear about a discovery of a short proof of FLT soon from a dead and unknown mathematician or from the history, > > But truly speaking you helped me a lot to convey my message by those arguments before I shall make the bigger COMING FACTS about mathematicians > > I also call upon all other branches of sciences to establish a parallel program to start dealing immediately with those silly UNSOLVED PROBLEMS > > Regards > B.Karzeddin- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Hey Harris, I bet you picked your new pseudonym "bassam king ..." as a play on "assing king". Conscious choice, or subconscious Freudian slip? Or is that what Quinn affectionately calls you?
From: neilist on 22 May 2007 14:50 On May 22, 7:41 am, bassam king karzeddin <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > On May 21, 11:07 am, bassam king karzeddin > > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > > On May 11, 5:53 am, bassam king karzeddin > > > > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > > > > On 9 Mai, 17:16, bassam king karzeddin > > > > > > <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: > > > > > > > > >What I had been working for many years > > was > > > > about > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > most >general theorem...: > > > > > > > > >For any triangle of positive, distinct, > > > > INTEGER > > > > > > > > SIDES > > > > > > > > >(L>M>S), there exists a positive real > > number > > > > > > (P>=1), > > > > > > > > such >that the following equation holds > > true > > > > > > always > > > > > > > > >S^P + M^P = L^P > > > > > > > > > Your "theorem" is a first year (may be > > first > > > > > > month) > > > > > > > > calculus exercise: > > > > > > > > Assume 0<r,s<1. Prove that > > > > > > > > f(x)=r^x+s^x-1 > > > > > > > > has a (unique) positive root. > > > > > > > > Proof: lim_x=0+ f(x)=1, lim_x=+infinity > > > > f(x)=-1. > > > > > > By > > > > > > > > continuity there is p in ]0,inf[ such > > that > > > > > > f(p)=0. > > > > > > > > Uniqueness (hint): Prove that f'(x)<0. > > > > > > > > By the way > > > > > > > > Did they teach you HOW to find P rather > > than > > > > it's > > > > > > existence only? > > > > > > > Or is there a direct formula for P? > > > > > > > > Can you imagine how the world will change > > > > > > immeadiatly if a direct formula for P is > > > > obtained? > > > > > > > Yes: Not at all > > > > > > Indeed, Not at all.... > > > > > > Regards > > > > > B.Karzeddin- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Hey, James Harris, you're back! Still crazy as > > ever! > > > > > Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha > > > > It seems that James Harris is not only dominating > > the sci.math issues but also casing a nightmares to > > the newborn here > > > > No Sir > > > > I'm not J.S, and it is up to you to deduce wrongly > > > > You may ask your teachers, or teachers of your > > teachers why they can't get in to defend their > > mathematics and I didn't expect to win my first war > > so easily, it is really a tasteless victory > > > > Indeed, MATHEMATICS IS TOO DIFFICULT FOR > > mathematicians > > > > Bassam Karzedd- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Ha ha ha, funny references to personal wars and > > aspersions on > > mathematicians. You haven't changed at all. > > > I'm sure you are still enjoying the "pleasurable > > company" of Quinn > > Tyler Jackson, your comrade in "arms". > > It seems that you don't believe me, or may be you are just plying around safely since no real identity is required here and that is really too bad, > > Or may be others are pushing you for their own purpose, but apart from that I can tell you that I can set you a better world, where university degrees are not required, only internet performance is required, where it will make your life much more meaningful, > > I also can answer many of your questions here but alas if time is available, so I shall ply it coolly and the changes must happen as you may notice from the many threads and news after my threads and threats indirectly, because it is the habits of your grand mathematicians all over the history to make stories, and no wonder if you will hear about a discovery of a short proof of FLT soon from a dead and unknown mathematician or from the history, > > But truly speaking you helped me a lot to convey my message by those arguments before I shall make the bigger COMING FACTS about mathematicians > > I also call upon all other branches of sciences to establish a parallel program to start dealing immediately with those silly UNSOLVED PROBLEMS > > Regards > B.Karzeddin- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Hey Harris, I bet you picked your new pseudonym "bassam king ..." as a play on "assing king". Conscious choice, or subconscious Freudian slip? Or is that what Quinn affectionately calls you?
From: neilist on 22 May 2007 14:51 On May 22, 7:41 am, bassam king karzeddin <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: <snip> Hey Harris, I bet you picked your new pseudonym "bassam king ..." as a play on "assing king". Conscious choice, or subconscious Freudian slip? Or is that what Quinn affectionately calls you?
From: neilist on 22 May 2007 14:51
On May 22, 7:41 am, bassam king karzeddin <bas...(a)ahu.edu.jo> wrote: <snip> Hey Harris, I bet you picked your new pseudonym "bassam king ..." as a play on "assing king". Conscious choice, or subconscious Freudian slip? Or is that what Quinn affectionately calls you? |