From: JosephKK on
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:54:58 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
wrote:

>Jim Thompson wrote:
>> On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:51:36 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> JosephKK wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:36:50 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> krw wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:10:22 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get a wood stove. Seriously, best investment we ever made in this house.
>>>>>>> Global "warming" has led us from 2-cord winters (where we got socked
>>>>>>> with a $709 propane bill for one (!) month and got the wood stove) to
>>>>>>> 4-cord winters. And I am not sure whether the purchase of 5 cords
>>>>>>> wouldn't be advised for next winter.
>>>>>> I think we're going to put the gas logs in the fireplace this year.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you imagine what propane heating would cost us this winter?
>>>>>> Propane varies widely across the country. In VT it was about 3x what
>>>>>> oil cost. Dunno here, yet.
>>>>> It's way more than gasoline out here in CA even though it has less BTU.
>>>>> So we thumbed our noses at the oil companies and went to wood heat. But
>>>>> I wish we had a bigger stove, with all this cooling trend. Despite what
>>>>> experts say I now think that bigger is better.
>>>> I would certainly pay attention to how efficient it was over its
>>>> heating power working range.
>>>
>>> Well, that's just it. At the 20% to 50% level it's supposedly around
>>> 78%. But California seems to get colder every year. So, more and more we
>>> find ourselves running it close to full bore and that's where the
>>> efficiency drops off. Still a clean burn, no smoke, but lots more heat
>>> escapes through the chimney. Modern wood stoves can operate quite well
>>> at the lower burn settings but not when you run them with primary plus
>>> secondary air fully open. Probably because they don't have much of a
>>> baffle system like older stoves do. Then they start eating wood as if it
>>> was popcorn. At this rate I am not sure our 4 cords will last through
>>> winter :-(
>>>
>>> This morning it happened for the first time that we needed wood stove +
>>> pellet stove + central heat to get the house warm. Here in the office it
>>> was 58F at 7:00am even though wood and pellet stoves ran all night.
>>
>> Damn! I come unglued at 68ºF... but then our humidity is ZERO :-(
>>
>
>How do you recognize an Arizonan? When he says "But it's a dry heat ..."
>
>In an hour I am starting my 2nd attempt to whack the ice cover on the
>steep driveway because I need to get to a client tomorrow, after being
>more or less stuck here in the house since Sunday. Wish me luck. This
>morning I heard a neighbor somewhere trying the same, then started up
>the car, put in gear, release brake ... ka-crunchah ... ka-chrunch ...
>phsssseeeee ... *CRUNCH* ... sounded like it's sitting in a frozen snow
>bank now.

This may sound weird but try taking a leaf blower to it.
From: Joerg on
JosephKK wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:54:58 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Jim Thompson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:51:36 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> JosephKK wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:36:50 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> krw wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:10:22 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Get a wood stove. Seriously, best investment we ever made in this house.
>>>>>>>> Global "warming" has led us from 2-cord winters (where we got socked
>>>>>>>> with a $709 propane bill for one (!) month and got the wood stove) to
>>>>>>>> 4-cord winters. And I am not sure whether the purchase of 5 cords
>>>>>>>> wouldn't be advised for next winter.
>>>>>>> I think we're going to put the gas logs in the fireplace this year.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you imagine what propane heating would cost us this winter?
>>>>>>> Propane varies widely across the country. In VT it was about 3x what
>>>>>>> oil cost. Dunno here, yet.
>>>>>> It's way more than gasoline out here in CA even though it has less BTU.
>>>>>> So we thumbed our noses at the oil companies and went to wood heat. But
>>>>>> I wish we had a bigger stove, with all this cooling trend. Despite what
>>>>>> experts say I now think that bigger is better.
>>>>> I would certainly pay attention to how efficient it was over its
>>>>> heating power working range.
>>>> Well, that's just it. At the 20% to 50% level it's supposedly around
>>>> 78%. But California seems to get colder every year. So, more and more we
>>>> find ourselves running it close to full bore and that's where the
>>>> efficiency drops off. Still a clean burn, no smoke, but lots more heat
>>>> escapes through the chimney. Modern wood stoves can operate quite well
>>>> at the lower burn settings but not when you run them with primary plus
>>>> secondary air fully open. Probably because they don't have much of a
>>>> baffle system like older stoves do. Then they start eating wood as if it
>>>> was popcorn. At this rate I am not sure our 4 cords will last through
>>>> winter :-(
>>>>
>>>> This morning it happened for the first time that we needed wood stove +
>>>> pellet stove + central heat to get the house warm. Here in the office it
>>>> was 58F at 7:00am even though wood and pellet stoves ran all night.
>>> Damn! I come unglued at 68�F... but then our humidity is ZERO :-(
>>>
>> How do you recognize an Arizonan? When he says "But it's a dry heat ..."
>>
>> In an hour I am starting my 2nd attempt to whack the ice cover on the
>> steep driveway because I need to get to a client tomorrow, after being
>> more or less stuck here in the house since Sunday. Wish me luck. This
>> morning I heard a neighbor somewhere trying the same, then started up
>> the car, put in gear, release brake ... ka-crunchah ... ka-chrunch ...
>> phsssseeeee ... *CRUNCH* ... sounded like it's sitting in a frozen snow
>> bank now.
>
> This may sound weird but try taking a leaf blower to it.


To a 2" ice cover? Well, I got it to go away, mostly, by whacking it
with a shovel, shoveling the ice sheets aside and dumping salt onto the
surface. The ice shattered with a noise like glass.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Joerg on
JosephKK wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:51:36 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> JosephKK wrote:
>>> On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:36:50 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> krw wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:10:22 -0800, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>> Get a wood stove. Seriously, best investment we ever made in this house.
>>>>>> Global "warming" has led us from 2-cord winters (where we got socked
>>>>>> with a $709 propane bill for one (!) month and got the wood stove) to
>>>>>> 4-cord winters. And I am not sure whether the purchase of 5 cords
>>>>>> wouldn't be advised for next winter.
>>>>> I think we're going to put the gas logs in the fireplace this year.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you imagine what propane heating would cost us this winter?
>>>>> Propane varies widely across the country. In VT it was about 3x what
>>>>> oil cost. Dunno here, yet.
>>>> It's way more than gasoline out here in CA even though it has less BTU.
>>>> So we thumbed our noses at the oil companies and went to wood heat. But
>>>> I wish we had a bigger stove, with all this cooling trend. Despite what
>>>> experts say I now think that bigger is better.
>>> I would certainly pay attention to how efficient it was over its
>>> heating power working range.
>>
>> Well, that's just it. At the 20% to 50% level it's supposedly around
>> 78%. But California seems to get colder every year. So, more and more we
>> find ourselves running it close to full bore and that's where the
>> efficiency drops off. Still a clean burn, no smoke, but lots more heat
>> escapes through the chimney. Modern wood stoves can operate quite well
>> at the lower burn settings but not when you run them with primary plus
>> secondary air fully open. Probably because they don't have much of a
>> baffle system like older stoves do. Then they start eating wood as if it
>> was popcorn. At this rate I am not sure our 4 cords will last through
>> winter :-(
>>
>> This morning it happened for the first time that we needed wood stove +
>> pellet stove + central heat to get the house warm. Here in the office it
>> was 58F at 7:00am even though wood and pellet stoves ran all night.
>
> I see that you understood me well. 58F is too crispy for me to get up
> without an emergency. I suggest at least two more cords. And more
> pellets. ISTR your place was decently insulated, but the cold snap
> has just been extreme.


The home is well insulated but the windows aren't. Single pane, albeit
thick glass. However, yesterday at the client I found that one of the
engineers had just replaced it on his whole house with dual-pane. $30k!
Our house has a lot more windows and sliders :-(

IOW, there ain't no chance at all to recoup that sort of investment.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Dave Platt on
In article <7ofiv7F3p57imU2(a)mid.individual.net>,
Joerg <news(a)analogconsultants.com> wrote:

>The home is well insulated but the windows aren't. Single pane, albeit
>thick glass. However, yesterday at the client I found that one of the
>engineers had just replaced it on his whole house with dual-pane. $30k!
>Our house has a lot more windows and sliders :-(

Ouch. We had a similar job done a few years ago - one-story
ranch-style, two big patio glass double-doors, big dual-pane sliding
windows in three bedrooms and the kitchen, plus a couple of bathroom
windows. We had low-emission double-pane glass installed, with
extra-thick used in the master bedroom and attached bath. The total
came to just a bit over $5k.

>IOW, there ain't no chance at all to recoup that sort of investment.

As far as comfort goes, though, it's a real win. The house feels a
lot snugger in winter, and significantly cooler during the hot days of
summer (it was well-insulated in other respects when we bought it).

I think it's the best investment we've made in the place.

Shop around... you may find that you can get good-quality double-pane
windows installed for rather less than what your cow-orker paid.

--
Dave Platt <dplatt(a)radagast.org> AE6EO
Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!
From: Joerg on
Dave Platt wrote:
> In article <7ofiv7F3p57imU2(a)mid.individual.net>,
> Joerg <news(a)analogconsultants.com> wrote:
>
>> The home is well insulated but the windows aren't. Single pane, albeit
>> thick glass. However, yesterday at the client I found that one of the
>> engineers had just replaced it on his whole house with dual-pane. $30k!
>> Our house has a lot more windows and sliders :-(
>
> Ouch. We had a similar job done a few years ago - one-story
> ranch-style, two big patio glass double-doors, big dual-pane sliding
> windows in three bedrooms and the kitchen, plus a couple of bathroom
> windows. We had low-emission double-pane glass installed, with
> extra-thick used in the master bedroom and attached bath. The total
> came to just a bit over $5k.
>

Do you remember which brand and who the installer company was (if
nationwide)? I am in Northen California. Which sometimes feels like
Siberia lately ...


>> IOW, there ain't no chance at all to recoup that sort of investment.
>
> As far as comfort goes, though, it's a real win. The house feels a
> lot snugger in winter, and significantly cooler during the hot days of
> summer (it was well-insulated in other respects when we bought it).
>
> I think it's the best investment we've made in the place.
>
> Shop around... you may find that you can get good-quality double-pane
> windows installed for rather less than what your cow-orker paid.
>

Ok, will do. I've heard that the Pella brand is good but I can't ask the
friend who had those installed over here because he passed away :-(

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Prev: Micro-coax cable, where to buy?
Next: Series RLC tutorial