From: Scott Nudds on

> > You are a spectacularly energetic public Liar Tom.


"Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
> Hey, it's another Archie sock-puppet!

You are a spectacularly energetic public Liar Tom.

Are you self taught?

Or have you been trained to Lie?
From: Scott Nudds on

"Tom" wrote
> Yes, I know. It just doesn't make sense to you.

Little of what you say does, as it is so spectacularly stupid, or so
easily outed as a complete lie on your part.



"Tom" wrote
> Conundrums amuse me.

Like all forms of spinning objects no doubt.



"Tom" wrote
> All quantification is statistical in nature. The suspected rules of the
> quantum world are statistical in nature, too.

Good for you Tom. You are finally learning something. Now your task is
to remember what you have just said so that unlike previous posts you don't
contradict youself in the very next sentence.



> > You see your problem is Tom... That you just aren't very smart.

"Tom" wrote
> Some people think "smart" means "agrees with me".

Some stupid people think smart means agrees with Bush.



From: Martin Swain on
Scott Nudds wrote:

Yes we are all very impressed by your vocabulary. Also enlightened
by your attitude. Now where is the documentation I requested?
From: Scott Nudds on

"Martin Swain" wrote
> Yes we are all very impressed by your vocabulary. Also enlightened
> by your attitude. Now where is the documentation I requested?

Since I have said nothing about perpetual motion, I do no feel anyway
obligated to respond to your request for information regarding perpetual
motion machines.

This should have been obvious to any thinking person.

What's your excuse?

From: mmeron on
In article <dtnsei$367$1(a)news.doit.wisc.edu>, QCD Apprentice <qcd.apprentice(a)gmail.com> writes:
>Martin Swain wrote:
>> Scott Nudds wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> the laws of
>>> thermodynamics are 1. statistical in nature and hence subject to
>>> violation,
>>
>>
>> Then why don't I get an occasional rebate from the power company?
>> Howcome my gas tank doesn't randomly fill up? You're full of poo,
>> that's why. The laws of thermodyamics describe physical systems,
>> not statistical distributions.
>>
>> You dude, are a well known troll.
>
>I don't know whether or not this man is a troll, but it is
>true that thermo/stat mech deals with ensembles and isn't
>necessarily true on small scales, either in number or time.

It would have been more exact to say "those results which are obtained
at the limit of infinite number of degrees of freedom are not
necessarily true".

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"