Free Energy
in [Physics]
|
From: Martin Swain on 24 Feb 2006 17:49 Scott Nudds wrote: > "Martin Swain" wrote > >>Yes we are all very impressed by your vocabulary. Also enlightened >>by your attitude. Now where is the documentation I requested? > > > Since I have said nothing about perpetual motion, I do no feel anyway > obligated to respond to your request for information regarding perpetual > motion machines. You did say something about free energy. Furthermore you said it had been demonstrated experimentally. Where is the documentation? I have asked you for it repeatedly. > > This should have been obvious to any thinking person. > > What's your excuse? I don't like you.
From: Scott Nudds on 24 Feb 2006 18:33 "Martin Swain" wrote > You did say something about free energy. Furthermore you said it > had been demonstrated experimentally. Where is the documentation? 1.. Casimir, H. G. B. "On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates." Proc. Con. Ned. Akad. van Wetensch B51 (7): 793-796 (1948). 2.. Lamoreaux, S. K. "Demonstration of the Casimir force in the 0.6 to 6 mm range." Physical review Letters 78 (1): 5-8 (1997). 3.. Schwinger, J. "Casimir light: The source." Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 90: 2105-6 (1993). 4.. Scharnhorst, K. Physics Letters B236: 354 (1990). snicker.
From: Martin Swain on 24 Feb 2006 19:01 Scott Nudds wrote: > "Martin Swain" wrote > >>You did say something about free energy. Furthermore you said it >>had been demonstrated experimentally. Where is the documentation? > > > 1.. Casimir, H. G. B. "On the attraction between two perfectly conducting > plates." Proc. Con. Ned. Akad. van Wetensch B51 (7): 793-796 (1948). > 2.. Lamoreaux, S. K. "Demonstration of the Casimir force in the 0.6 to 6 > mm range." Physical review Letters 78 (1): 5-8 (1997). > 3.. Schwinger, J. "Casimir light: The source." Proceedings of the National > Academy of Science, 90: 2105-6 (1993). > 4.. Scharnhorst, K. Physics Letters B236: 354 (1990). > snicker. > Thank you. I still don't like you. If you see me coming you'd better duck.
From: Scott Nudds on 24 Feb 2006 19:32 .. "Martin Swain" wrote > Thank you. I still don't like you. If you see me coming you'd better duck. Whatcha gonna do, slap me silly? Your spectacular loss here should teach you to avoid exposing your vast ignorance to public view.
From: Bill Ward on 24 Feb 2006 21:59
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:33:14 -0500, "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote: > >"Martin Swain" wrote >> You did say something about free energy. Furthermore you said it >> had been demonstrated experimentally. Where is the documentation? > > 1.. Casimir, H. G. B. "On the attraction between two perfectly conducting >plates." Proc. Con. Ned. Akad. van Wetensch B51 (7): 793-796 (1948). > 2.. Lamoreaux, S. K. "Demonstration of the Casimir force in the 0.6 to 6 >mm range." Physical review Letters 78 (1): 5-8 (1997). > 3.. Schwinger, J. "Casimir light: The source." Proceedings of the National >Academy of Science, 90: 2105-6 (1993). > 4.. Scharnhorst, K. Physics Letters B236: 354 (1990). >snicker. Perhaps you would be good enough to explain exactly how you get any energy out of the vacuum using the Casimir force? It doesn't count as "free energy" unless you can extract it (force != energy). Regards, Bill Ward |