From: James Jolley on 10 Jun 2010 14:57 On 2010-06-10 19:29:51 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> said: > On 2010-06-10 19:08:33 +0100, James Jolley said: > >> On 2010-06-10 19:05:26 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> said: >> >>> On 2010-06-10 18:39:02 +0100, James Jolley said: >>> >>>> On 2010-06-10 18:27:56 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> said: >>>> >>>>> Just so long as you're not designing hardware interfaces, getting male >>>>> and female connectors mixed up would be a problem! >>>> >>>> True enough, mustn't forget that people are usually baud after 1200. >>>> Seriously, those were the days. >>> >>> Just stop bit, now. >> >> Oh deary, love it when you go full duplex like that on me, really gets >> me bits aflowing. > > You'd better modulate your tone with me, young man! Or what? You're gonna hit me with your ringmask?
From: Jim on 10 Jun 2010 15:04 Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > Ah. Righto. Look, if you want to let me in particular know about > something, email's the thing. I'm quite wary of emailing people out of the blue. One of my foibles. Jim -- "Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: James Jolley on 10 Jun 2010 16:00 On 2010-06-10 20:04:15 +0100, jim(a)magrathea.plus.com (Jim) said: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > >> Ah. Righto. Look, if you want to let me in particular know about >> something, email's the thing. > > I'm quite wary of emailing people out of the blue. One of my foibles. > > Jim I'm like that. I'll reply if someone bothers to email me, of course you know that. I'd only email if I hadn't seen anything of them on here or something like that.
From: Rowland McDonnell on 10 Jun 2010 16:18 Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > > Ah. Righto. Look, if you want to let me in particular know about > > something, email's the thing. > > I'm quite wary of emailing people out of the blue. One of my foibles. <shrug> Weirdo. You'd be less antisocial here if you *did* send email. After all, I'd hardly be publishing my email address in every post I made if I had major objections to receiving email in response to a Usenet post. Which, if you think about it, is hardly `out of the blue', is it? Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Rowland McDonnell on 10 Jun 2010 16:21
James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > jim(a)magrathea.plus.com (Jim) said: > > > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Ah. Righto. Look, if you want to let me in particular know about > >> something, email's the thing. > > > > I'm quite wary of emailing people out of the blue. One of my foibles. > > > > Jim > > I'm like that. I'll reply if someone bothers to email me, of course you > know that. I'd only email if I hadn't seen anything of them on here or > something like that. Traditional Netiquette demands that `in the forum' one should stick more or less to the topic; and if off-topic stuff turns up, it `ought' to go elsewhere. And personal matters should always be taken to email (assuming a technical forum). That's traditional netiquette. People seem not to care about being rude these days. Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking |