Gravity quantified as acceleration
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Misconceptions from bad use of language was Re: Two slit experiment
Next: Latest climate climbdown: the Royal Society reviews its statements on global warming
From: NoEinstein on 18 Jun 2010 23:41 On Jun 18, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > No, Burt! The strength of gravity, using the Earth 'pound' as the standard of force, has one continuous pound of force acting on every one pound of mass. That is a very exacting STRENGTH of Gravity! NoEinstein > > On Jun 1, 2:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 1, 7:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 9:30 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > If there is a speed limit of the universe of C there is a change of > > > > speed limit below C. If you try to have a light speed acceleration > > > > change you encounter weight. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > accelerations and decelerations. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > changes of speed in space for energy. Weight prevents changing at the > > > > speed limit. All changes are below C. > > > > > The force of gravity has a limit at its extreme. It is less than light > > > > speed acceleration field of gravity. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Dear Burt: You should be on the Texas School Board. Those folks like > > > to make up 'facts', like: "...all 'people' are created equal, and are > > > endowed by their creator..." But I have to hand it to you, Burt: You > > > certainly give "science" your best effort. NoEinstein > > > Acceleration quantifies gravity's strength. It's simple. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Gravity strength is an absolute rateless quantity. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: BURT on 19 Jun 2010 01:46 On Jun 18, 8:41 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jun 18, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > No, Burt! The strength of gravity, using the Earth 'pound' as the > standard of force, has one continuous pound of force acting on every > one pound of mass. That is a very exacting STRENGTH of Gravity! > NoEinstein > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 1, 7:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 9:30 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > If there is a speed limit of the universe of C there is a change of > > > > > speed limit below C. If you try to have a light speed acceleration > > > > > change you encounter weight. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > accelerations and decelerations. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > changes of speed in space for energy. Weight prevents changing at the > > > > > speed limit. All changes are below C. > > > > > > The force of gravity has a limit at its extreme. It is less than light > > > > > speed acceleration field of gravity. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Dear Burt: You should be on the Texas School Board. Those folks like > > > > to make up 'facts', like: "...all 'people' are created equal, and are > > > > endowed by their creator..." But I have to hand it to you, Burt: You > > > > certainly give "science" your best effort. NoEinstein > > > > Acceleration quantifies gravity's strength. It's simple. > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Gravity strength is an absolute rateless quantity. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Acceleration is equivalent to the strength of gravity. Mitch Raemsch
From: NoEinstein on 19 Jun 2010 04:08 On Jun 18, 11:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Dunce: I am doubly certain that you have nothing to offer any discussion of science... unless defending the status quo to your death might be considered... science. Are you having fun, Parasite Dunce? NE > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > Ah, so let's recap. > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > Aha. > > PD
From: NoEinstein on 19 Jun 2010 04:20 On Jun 18, 3:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 18, 8:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > Aha. > > > PD > > The strength of gravity has a limit. It is both in freefall speed and > in weight of any given mass. There is a maximum weight for any given > amount of mass. There is below light speed freefall. > > Acceleration and its equivalent have a limit. > > Mitch Raemsch Dear Burt: The 'strength of gravity' 'g' will cause an acceleration of 32.174 feet per second EACH second. Since the velocity increases LINEARLY with respect to time, the velocity at any point in time can easily be determined. In no case are objects dropped in near Earth experiments influenced by light speed. The latter statement of yours suggests you still believe in Einstein's SR, which I have, of course, easily disproved. The maximum weight of a mass IS that same mass! If you wish to state the mass, in pounds, anywhere in the universe (not under gravity 'g') my KE formula gives the variables: KE = a/g (m) + v / 32.174 (m). NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 19 Jun 2010 04:24
On Jun 18, 11:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Burt: Maybe so... But 10% of my brain is still a greater reasoning capacity that all of the other physicists who ever lived in history, combined! NoEinstein > > On Jun 18, 8:28 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 18, 3:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Dear Burt: Congratulations! You may be 10% right! NE > > > > On Jun 18, 8:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > > > Aha. > > > > > PD > > > > The strength of gravity has a limit. It is both in freefall speed and > > > in weight of any given mass. There is a maximum weight for any given > > > amount of mass. There is below light speed freefall. > > > > Acceleration and its equivalent have a limit. > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > And you may be using 10% of your brain. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |