Gravity quantified as acceleration
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Misconceptions from bad use of language was Re: Two slit experiment
Next: Latest climate climbdown: the Royal Society reviews its statements on global warming
From: NoEinstein on 5 Jun 2010 00:08 On Jun 4, 3:33 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > PD, all of your demented ploys haven't raised your status one IOTA. You are a deluded imbecile! NE > > On Jun 4, 2:10 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 3, 11:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Dear Burt: I'm not "supposing", I'm stating a New Science TRUTH! > > Einstein himself said that if an Earth-mounted instrument can ever > > measure Earth's velocity, that his SR theory would be disproved. My > > X, Y, & Z interferometer detects (but can't quantify) Earth's motion > > and direction. > > Can't quantify? What do you think "measure" means? > > > I also disprove SR by simply showing that E = mc^2 / > > beta violates the Law of the Conservation of Energy. > > No, it doesn't. We've been over this. > > > > > You should try > > to understand my New Science rather than debate it. The reasoning > > FITS every observed phenomena in the Universe! NE > > > > On Jun 3, 8:28 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 3, 3:43 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear Burt: The links, below, explain my invalidation of the M-M > > > > experiment. Simple 9th grade algebra allows one to prove that light > > > > velocity is: V = c' + or - v. Light shinning in the direction of > > > > Earth's motion gets speeded up by the velocity of the Earth. Light > > > > shinning the opposite way gets slowed by the velocity of the Earth. > > > > NoEinstein > > > > > Where Angels Fear to Fallhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... > > > > > Replicating NoEinsteins Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f98526... > > > > > > On Jun 3, 7:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Burt: I not only didn't "overlook" that fact, I disproved > > > > > > Einstein's SR and his notion that 'c' is the speed limit of the > > > > > > Universe! NoEinstein > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 7:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 9:30 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If there is a speed limit of the universe of C there is a change of > > > > > > > > > speed limit below C. If you try to have a light speed acceleration > > > > > > > > > change you encounter weight. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > > > > accelerations and decelerations. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > > > > changes of speed in space for energy. Weight prevents changing at the > > > > > > > > > speed limit. All changes are below C. > > > > > > > > > > The force of gravity has a limit at its extreme. It is less than light > > > > > > > > > speed acceleration field of gravity. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > Dear Burt: You should be on the Texas School Board. Those folks like > > > > > > > > to make up 'facts', like: "...all 'people' are created equal, and are > > > > > > > > endowed by their creator..." But I have to hand it to you, Burt: You > > > > > > > > certainly give "science" your best effort. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > Its a fact that GR at its extreme violates the SR speed limit for > > > > > > > falling matter. This simple fact cannot be overlooked. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > You are a crackpot. Nothing has measured past the speed of light > > > > > Pleaes provide your measurements as proof. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Light shinning in the direction of > > > Earth's motion gets speeded up by the velocity of the Earth. Light > > > shinning the opposite way gets slowed by the velocity of the Earth. > > > > > > NoEinstein > > > > I challenge you that it is just the opposite. Think about what you are > > > saying. If the Earth moves in the same direction as the light the > > > light motion will slow down. These are two speeds moving together in > > > the same direction. So it is their difference that is observed. Please > > > show me where this is wrong. It is there difference that is slower. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 5 Jun 2010 00:11 On Jun 4, 3:44 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Burt: You redefine... 'science' every day. Can you give us a hint what you'll be saying tomorrow? NE > > On Jun 4, 12:01 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 3, 11:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Dear Burt: Please explain..."the second side of gravity". NE > > > > On Jun 3, 7:11 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 1, 5:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear Burt: True! At acceleration 'g', a one pound (Earth) mass > > > > weighs one pound. But at acceleration 2g, the "strength" of gravity > > > > is doubled! NoEinstein > > > > > > On Jun 1, 7:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 9:30 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > If there is a speed limit of the universe of C there is a change of > > > > > > > speed limit below C. If you try to have a light speed acceleration > > > > > > > change you encounter weight. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > > accelerations and decelerations. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > > changes of speed in space for energy. Weight prevents changing at the > > > > > > > speed limit. All changes are below C. > > > > > > > > The force of gravity has a limit at its extreme. It is less than light > > > > > > > speed acceleration field of gravity. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > Dear Burt: You should be on the Texas School Board. Those folks like > > > > > > to make up 'facts', like: "...all 'people' are created equal, and are > > > > > > endowed by their creator..." But I have to hand it to you, Burt: You > > > > > > certainly give "science" your best effort. NoEinstein > > > > > > Acceleration quantifies gravity's strength. It's simple. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > There is more than one side to gravity strength. It is two sided. > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > The two sides are round space speed and space aether accelerating > energy timelessly creating inward weight. They go hand in hand. The > strength of gravity expresses itself in two ways and they both are > without a rate. > > I know what God is doing. It is space speed or the first strength of > gravity. The second is aether. Both do not require time. What God is > doing sets up the second strength. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: BURT on 5 Jun 2010 01:00 On Jun 4, 9:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jun 4, 3:44 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Dear Burt: You redefine... 'science' every day. Can you give us a > hint what you'll be saying tomorrow? NE > > > > > > > On Jun 4, 12:01 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 3, 11:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Burt: Please explain..."the second side of gravity". NE > > > > > On Jun 3, 7:11 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 1, 5:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Burt: True! At acceleration 'g', a one pound (Earth) mass > > > > > weighs one pound. But at acceleration 2g, the "strength" of gravity > > > > > is doubled! NoEinstein > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 7:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 29, 9:30 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > If there is a speed limit of the universe of C there is a change of > > > > > > > > speed limit below C. If you try to have a light speed acceleration > > > > > > > > change you encounter weight. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > > > accelerations and decelerations. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > > > changes of speed in space for energy. Weight prevents changing at the > > > > > > > > speed limit. All changes are below C. > > > > > > > > > The force of gravity has a limit at its extreme. It is less than light > > > > > > > > speed acceleration field of gravity. > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > Dear Burt: You should be on the Texas School Board. Those folks like > > > > > > > to make up 'facts', like: "...all 'people' are created equal, and are > > > > > > > endowed by their creator..." But I have to hand it to you, Burt: You > > > > > > > certainly give "science" your best effort. NoEinstein > > > > > > > Acceleration quantifies gravity's strength. It's simple. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > There is more than one side to gravity strength. It is two sided. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > The two sides are round space speed and space aether accelerating > > energy timelessly creating inward weight. They go hand in hand. The > > strength of gravity expresses itself in two ways and they both are > > without a rate. > > > I know what God is doing. It is space speed or the first strength of > > gravity. The second is aether. Both do not require time. What God is > > doing sets up the second strength. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Aether flow is most important. Mitch Raemsch
From: PD on 5 Jun 2010 08:26 On Jun 4, 11:08 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jun 4, 3:33 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > PD, all of your demented ploys haven't raised your status one IOTA. > You are a deluded imbecile! NE I'm not concerned with "status". You are. You're consumed by it. I just asked you a question. > > > > > On Jun 4, 2:10 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 3, 11:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Burt: I'm not "supposing", I'm stating a New Science TRUTH! > > > Einstein himself said that if an Earth-mounted instrument can ever > > > measure Earth's velocity, that his SR theory would be disproved. My > > > X, Y, & Z interferometer detects (but can't quantify) Earth's motion > > > and direction. > > > Can't quantify? What do you think "measure" means? >
From: PD on 5 Jun 2010 08:28
On Jun 4, 11:04 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jun 4, 3:32 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear PD, the DUNCE: You, Pal, are at the bottom of the hill that I'm > the King of; remember? Please explain why a one pound object > traveling 32.174 feet per second, and "striking" a .5 gram house fly > almost never kills the fly. The actual reason: Force never exceeds > the resistance; that's why. Newton's third law says so; and you are a > worthless dunce! NoEinstein Newton's third law says nothing of the kind. > > > > > On Jun 4, 1:59 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 3, 10:30 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD: Google hasn't been showing all of the threads about "gravity, > > > 'pull' vs. PUSH". > > > Sure it has. You just don't know how to use the newsreader. > > > > That's probably because those threads became too > > > long for their memory > > > You've got to be kidding. > > > > On June 2, on sci.math, I replied to you with a > > > step-by-step explanation about the differences between dynamic > > > equilibrium and static equilibrium. I hope you will read such, > > > objectively. > > > I saw it. You mangled the physics there pretty badly too. > > > > I wasn't trying to be... mean, just clear. I spent over > > > an hour writing that reply, so I want you to see it. NoEinstein > > > > > On Jun 3, 9:22 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 2, 7:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear PD: The police are the Gestapos of (usually) corrupt > > > > > governments. They haven't got the foggiest notion what upholding the > > > > > constitution means. If they did, they would arrest all of the > > > > > SOCIALISTS, like those Hispanics who keep demonstrating against the > > > > > Arizona Law. > > > > > So you believe that quashing demonstrations is supported by the > > > > Constitution? > > > > > > And they would arrest Barack Obama for working > > > > > tirelessly to destroy our Representative Republic and the economic and > > > > > social viability of the USA. > > > > > And you believe that this is also supported by the Constitution? > > > > > > I invite others to read my essays at > > > > > Political Forum under: "Start the revolution! Government is out-of- > > > > > touch with the People! NoEinstein Real name: John A.. Armistead > > > > > > > On Jun 2, 1:42 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 10:51 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 9:19 am, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Burt: You should be on the Texas School Board. Those folks like > > > > > > > > > to make up 'facts', like: "...all 'people' are created equal, and are > > > > > > > > > endowed by their creator..." But I have to hand it to you, Burt: You > > > > > > > > > certainly give "science" your best effort. > > > > > > > > > Do you not believe in the statement "...all people are created equal, > > > > > > > > and are endowed by their creator..."? > > > > > > > > No, I don't. <shrug> > > > > > > > Of course you don't. You believe yourself to be significantly better > > > > > > than other folks, and so you've said. > > > > > > > > > If you would like to revoke your US citizenship, so that you do not > > > > > > > > have to abide in a country that was founded on this principle, I'm > > > > > > > > sure that can be arranged. > > > > > > > > Hmmm... Why do you think the US citizenship has anything to do with > > > > > > > that? > > > > > > > US citizenship involves an oath to uphold the Constitution for one, > > > > > > which was written following the declaration of intent to form a new > > > > > > nation, for another, in which those words were written. > > > > > > > If you do not believe that being a citizen implies allegiance to that > > > > > > Constitution, I suggest walking into the nearest police station and > > > > > > declaring your intent to ignore it. > > > > > > > Ignoramus. > > > > > > > > Let's find an example. > > > > > > > > The bankers lend money to idiots who think they deserve to live a > > > > > > > mansions. Well, obvious the idiots cannot do so. The idiots default > > > > > > > on the loans. The bankers got bailed out on their losses, and the > > > > > > > idiots walked away without much consequences. The ones that did not > > > > > > > participate have to pay for all that bullshit. Of course, all people > > > > > > > are not created equal. You just have to be in the right place at the > > > > > > > right time. Hell, even Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the > > > > > > > liar can be worshipped as a god by self-styled physicists. Go figure > > > > > > > that one out. It should not be very difficult to do so, Mr.. ex- > > > > > > > professor if one is to believe PD used to be a professor of physics. > > > > > > > <shrug>- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > |