Gravity quantified as acceleration
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Misconceptions from bad use of language was Re: Two slit experiment
Next: Latest climate climbdown: the Royal Society reviews its statements on global warming
From: GogoJF on 21 Jun 2010 21:57 On Jun 21, 8:54 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 21, 8:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 21, 5:53 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > PD: Mostly just the parts of physics that you defend are wrong. NE > > > > > > On Jun 19, 3:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 18, 11:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear Dunce: I am doubly certain that you have nothing to offer any > > > > discussion of science... unless defending the status quo to your death > > > > might be considered... science. Are you having fun, Parasite Dunce? > > > > NE > > > > I just wanted to be sure you're saying that ALL physics since Newton > > > is wrong, wrong, wrong. > > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > > > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > > > > Aha. > > > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > How's it going? Eternity is a long way away.
From: NoEinstein on 22 Jun 2010 10:32 On Jun 21, 9:54 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear GogoJF: When I get a phone call from a perfect stranger and they ask: "How are you, today?" I hang up, because I know it's a telemarketer. Apart from civilities, can you make a comment about any of my points of science? NoEinstein > > On Jun 21, 8:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 21, 5:53 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > PD: Mostly just the parts of physics that you defend are wrong. NE > > > > > > On Jun 19, 3:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 18, 11:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear Dunce: I am doubly certain that you have nothing to offer any > > > > discussion of science... unless defending the status quo to your death > > > > might be considered... science. Are you having fun, Parasite Dunce? > > > > NE > > > > I just wanted to be sure you're saying that ALL physics since Newton > > > is wrong, wrong, wrong. > > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > > > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > > > > Aha. > > > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > How's it going?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 22 Jun 2010 10:32 On Jun 21, 9:57 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 21, 8:54 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 8:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 21, 5:53 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > PD: Mostly just the parts of physics that you defend are wrong. NE > > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 3:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 18, 11:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Dunce: I am doubly certain that you have nothing to offer any > > > > > discussion of science... unless defending the status quo to your death > > > > > might be considered... science. Are you having fun, Parasite Dunce? > > > > > NE > > > > > I just wanted to be sure you're saying that ALL physics since Newton > > > > is wrong, wrong, wrong. > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > > > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > > > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > > > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > > > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > > > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > > > > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > > > > > Aha. > > > > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > How's it going? > > Eternity is a long way away.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Great! I hope you make it. NoEinstein
From: PD on 22 Jun 2010 12:28 On Jun 21, 8:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jun 21, 5:53 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > PD: Mostly just the parts of physics that you defend are wrong. NE I didn't defend Newton's laws. You targeted them yourself. I get it that your approach is that if I say something is right, then it must be wrong. So tell me, John, do you believe that 8+13=21? I maintain this is authoritatively true. So now I'm curious whether you now instantly suspect that it wrong. Does your knee jerk? > > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 3:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 18, 11:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Dunce: I am doubly certain that you have nothing to offer any > > > discussion of science... unless defending the status quo to your death > > > might be considered... science. Are you having fun, Parasite Dunce? > > > NE > > > I just wanted to be sure you're saying that ALL physics since Newton > > is wrong, wrong, wrong. > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > > > Aha. > > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 22 Jun 2010 22:10
On Jun 22, 12:28 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Yours are the musings of a psychotic man, PD. Talk to yourself for a while. Apparently, you are the only person in the world whom you love. NE > > On Jun 21, 8:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 21, 5:53 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > PD: Mostly just the parts of physics that you defend are wrong. NE > > I didn't defend Newton's laws. You targeted them yourself. > > I get it that your approach is that if I say something is right, then > it must be wrong. > > So tell me, John, do you believe that 8+13=21? I maintain this is > authoritatively true. So now I'm curious whether you now instantly > suspect that it wrong. Does your knee jerk? > > > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 3:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 18, 11:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear Dunce: I am doubly certain that you have nothing to offer any > > > > discussion of science... unless defending the status quo to your death > > > > might be considered... science. Are you having fun, Parasite Dunce? > > > > NE > > > > I just wanted to be sure you're saying that ALL physics since Newton > > > is wrong, wrong, wrong. > > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > > > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > > > > Aha. > > > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |