Gravity quantified as acceleration
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Misconceptions from bad use of language was Re: Two slit experiment
Next: Latest climate climbdown: the Royal Society reviews its statements on global warming
From: NoEinstein on 19 Jun 2010 04:30 On Jun 19, 1:46 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Burt: The 'strength' of gravity on Earth constantly applies a one pound downward force for every one pound of mass. In all cases, one pound forces have an associated acceleration 'g' that is 32.174 feet per second EACH second. So, the acceleration 'g' is associated with a force of one pound per pound of mass. NE > > On Jun 18, 8:41 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 18, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > No, Burt! The strength of gravity, using the Earth 'pound' as the > > standard of force, has one continuous pound of force acting on every > > one pound of mass. That is a very exacting STRENGTH of Gravity! > > NoEinstein > > > > On Jun 1, 2:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 1, 7:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On May 29, 9:30 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > If there is a speed limit of the universe of C there is a change of > > > > > > speed limit below C. If you try to have a light speed acceleration > > > > > > change you encounter weight. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > accelerations and decelerations. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > changes of speed in space for energy. Weight prevents changing at the > > > > > > speed limit. All changes are below C. > > > > > > > The force of gravity has a limit at its extreme. It is less than light > > > > > > speed acceleration field of gravity. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Dear Burt: You should be on the Texas School Board. Those folks like > > > > > to make up 'facts', like: "...all 'people' are created equal, and are > > > > > endowed by their creator..." But I have to hand it to you, Burt: You > > > > > certainly give "science" your best effort. NoEinstein > > > > > Acceleration quantifies gravity's strength. It's simple. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Gravity strength is an absolute rateless quantity. > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Acceleration is equivalent to the strength of gravity. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: BURT on 20 Jun 2010 20:20 On Jun 19, 1:30 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jun 19, 1:46 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Dear Burt: The 'strength' of gravity on Earth constantly applies a > one pound downward force for every one pound of mass. In all cases, > one pound forces have an associated acceleration 'g' that is 32.174 > feet per second EACH second. So, the acceleration 'g' is associated > with a force of one pound per pound of mass. NE > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 8:41 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 18, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > No, Burt! The strength of gravity, using the Earth 'pound' as the > > > standard of force, has one continuous pound of force acting on every > > > one pound of mass. That is a very exacting STRENGTH of Gravity! > > > NoEinstein > > > > > On Jun 1, 2:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 1, 7:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 9:30 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > If there is a speed limit of the universe of C there is a change of > > > > > > > speed limit below C. If you try to have a light speed acceleration > > > > > > > change you encounter weight. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > > accelerations and decelerations. The purpose of weight is to limit > > > > > > > changes of speed in space for energy. Weight prevents changing at the > > > > > > > speed limit. All changes are below C. > > > > > > > > The force of gravity has a limit at its extreme. It is less than light > > > > > > > speed acceleration field of gravity. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > Dear Burt: You should be on the Texas School Board. Those folks like > > > > > > to make up 'facts', like: "...all 'people' are created equal, and are > > > > > > endowed by their creator..." But I have to hand it to you, Burt: You > > > > > > certainly give "science" your best effort. NoEinstein > > > > > > Acceleration quantifies gravity's strength. It's simple. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Gravity strength is an absolute rateless quantity. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Acceleration is equivalent to the strength of gravity. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Look for Einstein's Equivalence Principle. It becomes gravity strength quantified by an acceleration with a limit. Mitch Raemsch
From: PD on 21 Jun 2010 17:53 On Jun 19, 3:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jun 18, 11:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Dunce: I am doubly certain that you have nothing to offer any > discussion of science... unless defending the status quo to your death > might be considered... science. Are you having fun, Parasite Dunce? > NE I just wanted to be sure you're saying that ALL physics since Newton is wrong, wrong, wrong. > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > Aha. > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 21 Jun 2010 21:51 On Jun 21, 5:53 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > PD: Mostly just the parts of physics that you defend are wrong. NE > > On Jun 19, 3:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 18, 11:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Dunce: I am doubly certain that you have nothing to offer any > > discussion of science... unless defending the status quo to your death > > might be considered... science. Are you having fun, Parasite Dunce? > > NE > > I just wanted to be sure you're saying that ALL physics since Newton > is wrong, wrong, wrong. > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > > Aha. > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: GogoJF on 21 Jun 2010 21:54
On Jun 21, 8:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jun 21, 5:53 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > PD: Mostly just the parts of physics that you defend are wrong. NE > > > > > > On Jun 19, 3:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 18, 11:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Dunce: I am doubly certain that you have nothing to offer any > > > discussion of science... unless defending the status quo to your death > > > might be considered... science. Are you having fun, Parasite Dunce? > > > NE > > > I just wanted to be sure you're saying that ALL physics since Newton > > is wrong, wrong, wrong. > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:59 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Newton neglected to explain that it is > > > > > the INERTIC of the lighter object which limits the force. Even so, > > > > > you still have ZERO force to do work, since coasting expends zero > > > > > energy, and requires zero force to cause the coasting distance to > > > > > accrue. Case closed, Dunce! NE > > > > > Ah, so let's recap. > > > > Now you are certain that Newton is ALSO wrong. > > > > Aha. > > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - How's it going? |