How Steve Jobs saves Chinese people
in [Mac Systems]
|
Prev: Gizmodo on Android
Next: WWDC
From: Jolly Roger on 7 Jun 2010 18:05 In article <michelle-8856BF.06543907062010(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > In article <jollyroger-D4A711.08082007062010(a)news.individual.net>, > Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > > > > So, Steiner wnats to plays dirty, can't stand the truth that her > > > > pappy > > > > > > Go away, "Mark". > > > > He probably would, if folks stopped giving him the attention he wants. > > Betcha that if everyone stops replying to him, he will continue to spam us. How much are you willing to bet? More importantly, how do you intend to test your theory? -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: Jolly Roger on 7 Jun 2010 18:06 In article <yobtype1zra.fsf(a)panix1.panix.com>, BreadWithSpam(a)fractious.net wrote: > Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> writes: > > > Betcha that if everyone stops replying to him, he will continue to spam us. > > Even if he does, it's still better than seeing all the replies, > especially the silly back-and-forth fact-less name-calling. > > And it'll be a lot easier on our killfiles. My filters do a pretty decent job of filtering out the majority of the noise. You're right though: Michelle and Davoud's replies stand out like a sore thumb. -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: Mark Swellman on 7 Jun 2010 19:15 On 06/07/2010 07:00 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: > In article<jollyroger-D5A56D.17053307062010(a)news.individual.net>, > Jolly Roger<jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > >>>> He probably would, if folks stopped giving him the attention he wants. >>> >>> Betcha that if everyone stops replying to him, he will continue to spam us. >> >> How much are you willing to bet? >> >> More importantly, how do you intend to test your theory? > > OK, I'll stop replying to him. Then it's up to everyone else to do the > same. Pheeew! At least a clean thread where all those Morons won't be patting each other back because they can't face the truth: teh Guru is a proslaver!
From: Mark Swellman on 7 Jun 2010 19:17 On 06/07/2010 06:07 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: > OK, so you're a cheapskate who values price over quality. Foxconn, quality? And I know what market cap, is :)
From: salgud on 8 Jun 2010 09:59
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:09:37 -0700, Michelle Steiner wrote: > In article <1q3kthqpwzsm1$.1wrm0wvcrt0s6$.dlg(a)40tude.net>, > salgud <spamboy6547(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >> Let's face it, you live for the trolls! > > Nope; I would rather they weren't here at all. But I learned at an early > age, the best thing to do with bullies and wannabe bullies is to stand up > against them. And trolls are nothing but virtual bullies. > Yes, gotta protect yourself from those "virtual" bullies. Stand up to 'em! Right. Gocha! > As a demi-troll, you should understand that. > Now that really hurts! Only a demi-troll? I've fallen from grace. >> They make your day a little less gray. > > To a point, yes, but my day is pretty much lacking in greyness anyway. Obviously, you wouldn't be in here chasing after trolls, and even demi-trolls, if you had a life. |