From: Jolly Roger on
In article
<michelle-DFF16D.20064408062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>,
Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:

> In article <jollyroger-EE5316.21272508062010(a)news.individual.net>,
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > Anyone can troll. By trying to get a rise out of those you consider
> > trolls, you are acting as a troll, too.
> >
> > You are doing it wrong.
>
> Not that I want to, but how would I go about doing it right to act like a
> troll?

You misunderstood me.

What you are doing wrong is responding at all. In responding, you are
trolling as well.

> What I was trying to do, though, was pointing Salgud's hypocrisy to him;
> him calling anyone a troll is the pot calling the kettle black.

Oh the irony...

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: Thomas R. Kettler on
In article <kwt4ugesuoql.4oil4szyz25b.dlg(a)40tude.net>,
salgud <spamboy6547(a)comcast.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:54:43 -0400, Thomas R. Kettler wrote:
>
> > In article <pubrnpbu5qlk$.1d9mkyu2mdy8w$.dlg(a)40tude.net>,
> > salgud <spamboy6547(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:16:04 -0400, Thomas R. Kettler wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> <michelle-DFF16D.20064408062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>,
> >>> Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> In article <jollyroger-EE5316.21272508062010(a)news.individual.net>,
> >>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Anyone can troll. By trying to get a rise out of those you consider
> >>>>> trolls, you are acting as a troll, too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You are doing it wrong.
> >>>>
> >>>> Not that I want to, but how would I go about doing it right to act like
> >>>> a
> >>>> troll?
> >>>>
> >>>> What I was trying to do, though, was pointing Salgud's hypocrisy to him;
> >>>> him calling anyone a troll is the pot calling the kettle black.
> >>>
> >>> As a Kettler, I resent that remark.
> >>
> >> Are you black?
> >
> > No.
>
> So the pot's a liar!

Exactly.
--
Remove blown from email address to reply.
From: George Kerby on



On 6/9/10 8:55 AM, in article
tkettler-21456F.09545809062010(a)news.eternal-september.org, "Thomas R.
Kettler" <tkettler(a)blownfuse.net> wrote:

> In article <C83505C3.477D4%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com>,
> George Kerby <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/8/10 11:16 PM, in article
>> tkettler-C51304.00160409062010(a)reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated.exampl
>> e.com, "Thomas R. Kettler" <tkettler(a)blownfuse.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <michelle-DFF16D.20064408062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>,
>>> Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <jollyroger-EE5316.21272508062010(a)news.individual.net>,
>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Anyone can troll. By trying to get a rise out of those you consider
>>>>> trolls, you are acting as a troll, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are doing it wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Not that I want to, but how would I go about doing it right to act like a
>>>> troll?
>>>>
>>>> What I was trying to do, though, was pointing Salgud's hypocrisy to him;
>>>> him calling anyone a troll is the pot calling the kettle black.
>>>
>>> As a Kettler, I resent that remark.
>>
>> Well, you certainly resemble it, fur sur.
>
> Sorry, I don't have a potbelly.

But they make great ham sandwiches.

From: Jolly Roger on
In article <michelle-101F7C.11013609062010(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:

> In article <jollyroger-3A88A7.12394009062010(a)news.individual.net>,
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Anyone can troll. By trying to get a rise out of those you consider
> > > > trolls, you are acting as a troll, too.
> > > >
> > > > You are doing it wrong.
> > >
> > > Not that I want to, but how would I go about doing it right to act
> > > like a troll?
> >
> > You misunderstood me.
>
> Deliberately so. I thought it would be funny.
>
> But you respond to trolls too.

I may, but certainly much less often than you do. In fact, I'm having
trouble recalling any that you ignore. You seem to get involved in
nearly every troll that hits this news group.

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: Jolly Roger on
In article
<michelle-955086.14285709062010(a)reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated.e
xample.com>,
Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:

> In article <jollyroger-913037.15441909062010(a)news.individual.net>,
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > > But you respond to trolls too.
> >
> > I may, but certainly much less often than you do. In fact, I'm having
> > trouble recalling any that you ignore. You seem to get involved in
> > nearly every troll that hits this news group.
>
> I have Zara, Yugo, Priam, *.uk and *.advocacy in my kill file.

Yet you regularly reply to their posts anyway...

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: Gizmodo on Android
Next: WWDC