Prev: Gizmodo on Android
Next: WWDC
From: salgud on 11 Jun 2010 11:14
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:52:47 -0500, Jolly Roger wrote:

> In article
> <michelle-955086.14285709062010(a)reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated.e
> xample.com>,
> Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:
>
>> In article <jollyroger-913037.15441909062010(a)news.individual.net>,
>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > But you respond to trolls too.
>>>
>>> I may, but certainly much less often than you do. In fact, I'm having
>>> trouble recalling any that you ignore. You seem to get involved in
>>> nearly every troll that hits this news group.
>>
>> I have Zara, Yugo, Priam, *.uk and *.advocacy in my kill file.
>
> Yet you regularly reply to their posts anyway...

Neat! An argument in which both parties admit to being dim-witted, but are
arguing about who is more dim-witted!
From: salgud on 11 Jun 2010 11:48
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:27:24 -0700, Michelle Steiner wrote:

> In article <1by3syg8kqbf8$.1rpj1szli708q.dlg(a)40tude.net>,
> salgud <spamboy6547(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Neat! An argument in which both parties admit to being dim-witted, but
>> are arguing about who is more dim-witted!
>
> Neither of us can hold a candle to you in that regard.

Are not! (now you have to reply with, "Are too!")
From: salgud on 11 Jun 2010 13:39
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:27:24 -0700, Michelle Steiner wrote:

> In article <1by3syg8kqbf8$.1rpj1szli708q.dlg(a)40tude.net>,
> salgud <spamboy6547(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Neat! An argument in which both parties admit to being dim-witted, but
>> are arguing about who is more dim-witted!
>
> Neither of us can hold a candle to you in that regard.

LOL! Sorry, but that won't work. By your own standards, the measure of
dim-wittedness that you're arguing is how many times you've replied to
trolls. Since I don't, I'm not even a candidate.

Please, continue.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: Gizmodo on Android
Next: WWDC