How to tell a rank amateur from a seasoned one, or a pro
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Winter is near
Next: CMOS sensors worthless for video?
From: Pete on 2 Jul 2010 15:00 On 2010-07-02 19:45:51 +0100, Jeff Jones said: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:20:49 -0400, "Peter" wrote: > >> And this has what to do with your definition? >> I am not trying to convince you. That is a waste of time. I just don't want >> to see a newbie to be mislead. > > LOL!!!!!!! > > Now that's funny. You talking about "newbies" as if they are something > other than yourself. > > HAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!! Have you finished yet or is there some more intellectual stimulation pending? -- Pete
From: Peter on 2 Jul 2010 15:41 "Pete" <available.on.request(a)aserver.invalid> wrote in message news:2010070220004189609-availableonrequest(a)aserverinvalid... > On 2010-07-02 19:45:51 +0100, Jeff Jones said: > >> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:20:49 -0400, "Peter" wrote: >> >>> And this has what to do with your definition? >>> I am not trying to convince you. That is a waste of time. I just don't >>> want >>> to see a newbie to be mislead. >> >> LOL!!!!!!! >> >> Now that's funny. You talking about "newbies" as if they are something >> other than yourself. >> >> HAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!! > > Have you finished yet or is there some more intellectual stimulation > pending? > My only comment about the troll is Whoosh! -- Peter
From: John McWilliams on 2 Jul 2010 18:03 John Navas wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:22:17 -0400, in > <4c2e0434$1$5497$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, "Peter" > <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: > >> "John Navas" <jncl1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message >> news:tuur265k6hfr11j3emi7k3g40vvsk14jqa(a)4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:27:48 -0400, in >>> <4c2df7c0$0$5543$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, "Peter" >>> <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >>> >>>> "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave(a)final.front.ear> wrote in message >>>> news:i0knkt$549$1(a)qmul... > >>>>> I've always connsider shutter lag as shutter lag in that it's the >>>>> differnce in time between activate the shutter button (in a sense that's >>>>> the picture you wish to take) compared to the time it takes the >>>>> electronics to open the shutter and store the image in it's buffer. >>>>> Focausing has nothin gto do with shutter lag. >>>> Using your perception, focusing time is included in the parameters you >>>> set. >>> Not necessarily -- the lens may well be pre-focused. >> Yup! Very easy to do in wildlife photography. Just pick your spot and let >> the wildlife come to you. > > It's also often easy even in action sports photography with hyperfocal > focusing. Indeed, if the action is such that you can predict where appropriate action will occur. Easy enough in most racing, baseball, basketball and football. Not so easy in soccer, lacrosse and hockey, except for Goalie action. -- John McWilliams
From: Rich on 2 Jul 2010 21:25 On Jul 2, 2:44 pm, Jeff Jones <jj197109...(a)mailinator.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:49:33 +0100, "whisky-dave" > > <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > > >I'm wondering when the first camera with pre-shutter trigger will be > >released > >as standard like auto focus is today. > > Already been done. A few cameras continually capture images at high > frame-rates, then it pauses the capturing of frames when you actually press > the shutter. Allowing you to select from frames captured previous to the > time you actually pressed the shutter button. This allows you to get those > images where you sometimes say to yourself, "Damn, I'm going to miss that > shot!" Not from any shutter-lag mind you, but from your own senses not > being quick enough to predict the unforeseen. > > This is what you people get for not knowing much, or more often nothing at > all, about the P&S cameras that you always go on and on about as ignorantly > as you all do. As for high speed capture, I'd use a camera dedicated to that, like an industrial CCD and not a point and shoot with an ugly, ultra low rez mode tacked on to its other useless features.
From: Outing Trolls is FUN! on 2 Jul 2010 21:35
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 18:25:43 -0700 (PDT), Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jul 2, 2:44�pm, Jeff Jones <jj197109...(a)mailinator.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:49:33 +0100, "whisky-dave" >> >> <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> >> >I'm wondering when the first camera with pre-shutter trigger will be >> >released >> >as standard like auto focus is today. >> >> Already been done. A few cameras continually capture images at high >> frame-rates, then it pauses the capturing of frames when you actually press >> the shutter. Allowing you to select from frames captured previous to the >> time you actually pressed the shutter button. This allows you to get those >> images where you sometimes say to yourself, "Damn, I'm going to miss that >> shot!" Not from any shutter-lag mind you, but from your own senses not >> being quick enough to predict the unforeseen. >> >> This is what you people get for not knowing much, or more often nothing at >> all, about the P&S cameras that you always go on and on about as ignorantly >> as you all do. > >As for high speed capture, I'd use a camera dedicated to that, like an >industrial CCD and not a point and shoot with an ugly, ultra low rez >mode tacked on to its other useless features. Why are you complaining about and fighting with cameras and component designs that only exist in your own warped imagination and nowhere else? You enjoy and crave the mental-masturbation, do you? Some of you are in dire need of education and connection with reality. |