I'm so proud, I weaned someone off a P&S to a DSLR!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Immigration: The shocking truth about the immigrants who openedthe floodgates
Next: The real cost of being sued by Getty
From: -hh on 29 Oct 2009 12:41 John Navas <spamfilt...(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > -hh <recscuba_goo...(a)huntzinger.com> wrote: > > John Navas <spamfilt...(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:21:47 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > > >> >The criteria is only "dSLR", which this Pentax undoubtedly is. As > >> >such, you're trying to move the goalposts. Again. > > >> Your criteria, not mine. > > >If that was true, then you could immediately cite where the caveat of > >a major brand name was stated. > > >Good luck finding that, John. > > (Too lame to warrant any sort of response.) But even the above is still a response, which means that John's own actions reveal his own words to be a lie. And because John replied but without a cite, this is about the best as we can expect from "Honest" John that he is admitting that he was to dishonestly trying to move the goalposts. Again. -hh
From: -hh on 29 Oct 2009 13:00 John Navas <spamfilt...(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > -hh <recscuba_goo...(a)huntzinger.com> wrote: > >The cowardly troll writes: > > namecalling. [see below] Wrong, because this poster is most certainly a troll and his nymshifting is a cowardly attempt to avoid responsibility for his behavior, so it is a factually based representation. If the troll were to retain a consistent handle, then his handle would be honored. But since he refuses to do so by his constant nymshifting, he has forfeited the naming rights his own common identifier to his "victims". Thus, the readership has been empowered to name the troll's common identifier, which is their right as a means to counter his attempts to deceive through his nymshifting. If the 'cowardly troll' doesn't like what he has allowed, then he should announce that he is no longer going to nymshift, pick a name and then live up to his promise to no longer nymshift. If (really: when) he gets caught nymshifting again, then he forfeits this once again. Thus, the ball is in his court to put an end to this, although it is IMO extremely unlikely that he will prove ultimately capable of being honest enough to actually live up to such a promise made. Naturally, he could suprise us all and do that all to prove me wrong, but this scenario is really a circumstance where I would actually like to be wrong in being so cynical of this individual. -hh
From: John Navas on 29 Oct 2009 13:06 On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:00:06 -0700 (PDT), -hh <recscuba_google(a)huntzinger.com> wrote in <c8094288-ffed-40af-a11a-dd5daf43d17a(a)n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>: >John Navas <spamfilt...(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> -hh <recscuba_goo...(a)huntzinger.com> wrote: >> >The cowardly troll writes: >> >> namecalling. �[see below] > >Wrong, because this poster is most certainly a troll and his >nymshifting is a cowardly attempt to avoid responsibility for his >behavior, so it is a factually based representation. It's nothing more than childish namecalling. You show yourself to be no better the alleged troll. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: Outing Trolls is FUN! on 29 Oct 2009 13:36 On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:00:06 -0700 (PDT), -hh <recscuba_google(a)huntzinger.com> wrote: >John Navas <spamfilt...(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> -hh <recscuba_goo...(a)huntzinger.com> wrote: >> >The cowardly troll writes: >> >> namecalling. �[see below] > >Wrong, because this poster is most certainly a troll and his >nymshifting is a cowardly attempt to avoid responsibility for his >behavior, so it is a factually based representation. > >If the troll were to retain a consistent handle, then his handle would >be honored. But since he refuses to do so by his constant >nymshifting, he has forfeited the naming rights his own common >identifier to his "victims". Thus, the readership has been empowered >to name the troll's common identifier, which is their right as a means >to counter his attempts to deceive through his nymshifting. > >If the 'cowardly troll' doesn't like what he has allowed, then he >should announce that he is no longer going to nymshift, pick a name >and then live up to his promise to no longer nymshift. If (really: >when) he gets caught nymshifting again, then he forfeits this once >again. Thus, the ball is in his court to put an end to this, although >it is IMO extremely unlikely that he will prove ultimately capable of >being honest enough to actually live up to such a promise made. >Naturally, he could suprise us all and do that all to prove me wrong, >but this scenario is really a circumstance where I would actually like >to be wrong in being so cynical of this individual. > > >-hh Ah, the plaintive yet oft heard off-topic red-herring trolling from a resident troll that has been proved 100% wrong again. I so miss seeing that. You see it so rare these days. one name spewing many deceptions = not a troll many names spewing hard cold facts = troll I guess its the only argument the resident-trolls have left. LOL!
From: -hh on 29 Oct 2009 14:36
John Navas <spamfilt...(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > -hh <recscuba_goo...(a)huntzinger.com> wrote: > >John Navas <spamfilt...(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> -hh <recscuba_goo...(a)huntzinger.com> wrote: > >> >The cowardly troll writes: > > >> namecalling. [see below] > > >Wrong, because this poster is most certainly a troll and his > >nymshifting is a cowardly attempt to avoid responsibility for his > >behavior, so it is a factually based representation. > > It's nothing more than childish namecalling. > You show yourself to be no better the alleged troll. You're being a selective bigot, John. And the fact remains the he has forfeited his naming rights to the readership. So what do you want us to do? Call for formal nominations and hold a vote? By casual observance, we already have at least three nominations: A) copy & paste troll B) cowardly troll C) dear resident troll ....are you going to step up to volunteer to run the proceedings, to make the troll's naming appear more "democratic"? If not, then stop whining. -hh |