From: Zo on

[ZO] expressed precisely :
> From: "Zo" <homenet(a)newsbill.net>
>
>
>> [ZO] brought next idea :
>>> Zo <homenet(a)newsbill.net> wrote in
>>> news:hvrhve$3jq$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:
>
>>>> Is anyone using this new tool? Seems to be a very hot download item
>>>> at MajorGeeks (downloaded 2304597 times as of this posting) Didn't see
>>>> any major problems or complaints in their forums)
>
>>> Uh, no.. The company has less than.. decent work ethics.. See here:
>
>>> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=33217
>
>> Don't jump to conclusions without researching all of the facts. See my
>> reply to David.
>
> WRONG !
>
> As employees of Malwarebytes WE had INTIMATE knowledge of this subject matter
> !

and what court date has been set?

And on another note: I guess it would rather difficult to take the
chinese to court and win seeing they practical own this country.

--
Zo
"Support your local Search and Rescue unit -- get lost."


From: David H. Lipman on
From: "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com>

| "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in
| news:hvtvj10i46(a)news6.newsguy.com:

>> From: "Zo" <homenet(a)newsbill.net>


>>| It happens that [ZO] formulated :
>>>> From: "Zo" <homenet(a)newsbill.net>


>>>>> Is anyone using this new tool? Seems to be a very hot download
>>>>> item at MajorGeeks (downloaded 2304597 times as of this posting)
>>>>> Didn't see any major problems or complaints in their forums)

>>>> Don't support these thieves !

>>>> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=33217

>>| Well now I think that was about one companys' word against another.

>>| Orbit's explanation seems valid to me and judging from the growing
>>| number of daily downloads from MajorGeeks, it appears others have
>>| accepted it as well.

>>| http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?t=4807

>>| Thanks for the feedback.

>> No. They stole the database. There is NO DOUBT about it.

>> Their detection rate sored when they implemented them and their
>> detection rate dropped when they removed them.

>> Their "growing number of daily downloads from MajorGeeks" means
>> absolutely nothing. Like you, they have no idea about their
>> plagiarism. As a MBAM employee I knew what was going on and I know
>> the MBAM database and HOW they could have obtained it. Malwarebytes
>> laid a trap for IOBit and they fell right into it. It wasn't until
>> they fell into that trap was the subject matter disclosed publicly.

>> What people fail to recognize is that the Chinese do NOT understand
>> what "Intellectual Property Rights" are. The Chinese steal from other
>> countries every hour of every day and do whatever they can to make
>> China a "world leader". Why do you think China is the "knock off"
>> capital of the world ?

>> I could produce NUMEREOUS examples from Disney movies to archetectual
>> drawings. As a malware researcher I know how Chinese Malware is used
>> to exfiltrate data to gain a "competitive edge". I also have other
>> information from another source that I can't even discuss.

>> This is not "one companys' word against another".
>> Marcin and Bruce created non-malicious fake malware and created a
>> signature pattern and included it in the MBAM Database. When IObit
>> was found to detect this "never released" and "fake malware" using the
>> detection name Marcin and Bruce created, there was no doubt. IOBit had
>> plagiarized the database. This was a well thought out trap and IOBit
>> fell right into it.



| And you or MBAM filed a lawsuit?

The MBAM solicitor contacted IObit.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: David H. Lipman on
From: "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com>

| "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in
| news:hvtvvc0i8u(a)news6.newsguy.com:

>> From: "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com>

>>| Zo <homenet(a)newsbill.net> wrote in news:hvstsp$iqb$1(a)news.eternal-
>>| september.org:

>>>> [ZO] brought next idea :
>>>>> Zo <homenet(a)newsbill.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:hvrhve$3jq$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:

>>>>>> Is anyone using this new tool? Seems to be a very hot download
>>>>>> item at MajorGeeks (downloaded 2304597 times as of this posting)
>>>>>> Didn't see any major problems or complaints in their forums)

>>>>> Uh, no.. The company has less than.. decent work ethics.. See here:

>>>>> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=33217

>>>> Don't jump to conclusions without researching all of the facts. See
>>>> my reply to David.

>>| heh.. David and myself are both former employees of malwarebytes who
>>| worked in the research dept. I assure you, we have researched all the
>>| facts and this is not a case of jumping to conclusions. We have seen
>>| what iodid with our own eyes. It was very hard to miss our work
>>| inside their database.



>> +10

>> I remember "our" discussions PRIOR to Marcin releasing the news.
>> { I won't go any further than that }



| and the case number is?

Yours ?
666


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: David H. Lipman on
From: "Zo" <homenet(a)newsbill.net>


| [ZO] expressed precisely :
>> From: "Zo" <homenet(a)newsbill.net>


>>> [ZO] brought next idea :
>>>> Zo <homenet(a)newsbill.net> wrote in
>>>> news:hvrhve$3jq$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:

>>>>> Is anyone using this new tool? Seems to be a very hot download item
>>>>> at MajorGeeks (downloaded 2304597 times as of this posting) Didn't see
>>>>> any major problems or complaints in their forums)

>>>> Uh, no.. The company has less than.. decent work ethics.. See here:

>>>> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=33217

>>> Don't jump to conclusions without researching all of the facts. See my
>>> reply to David.

>> WRONG !

>> As employees of Malwarebytes WE had INTIMATE knowledge of this subject matter
>> !

| and what court date has been set?

| And on another note: I guess it would rather difficult to take the
| chinese to court and win seeing they practical own this country.

As previously stated...
"The MBAM solicitor contacted IObit."

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: Zo on

[ZO] presented the following explanation :
> From: "Zo" <homenet(a)newsbill.net>
>
>
>> It happens that [ZO] formulated :
>>> From: "Zo" <homenet(a)newsbill.net>
>
>
>>>> Is anyone using this new tool? Seems to be a very hot download item
>>>> at MajorGeeks (downloaded 2304597 times as of this posting) Didn't see
>>>> any major problems or complaints in their forums)
>
>>> Don't support these thieves !
>
>>> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=33217
>
>> Well now I think that was about one companys' word against another.
>
>> Orbit's explanation seems valid to me and judging from the growing
>> number of daily downloads from MajorGeeks, it appears others have
>> accepted it as well.
>
>> http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?t=4807
>
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> No. They stole the database. There is NO DOUBT about it.
>
> Their detection rate sored when they implemented them and their detection
> rate dropped when they removed them.
>
> Their "growing number of daily downloads from MajorGeeks" means absolutely
> nothing. Like you, they have no idea about their plagiarism. As a MBAM
> employee I knew what was going on and I know the MBAM database and HOW they
> could have obtained it. Malwarebytes laid a trap for IOBit and they fell
> right into it. It wasn't until they fell into that trap was the subject
> matter disclosed publicly.
>
> What people fail to recognize is that the Chinese do NOT understand what
> "Intellectual Property Rights" are. The Chinese steal from other countries
> every hour of every day and do whatever they can to make China a "world
> leader". Why do you think China is the "knock off" capital of the world ?
>
> I could produce NUMEREOUS examples from Disney movies to archetectual
> drawings. As a malware researcher I know how Chinese Malware is used to
> exfiltrate data to gain a "competitive edge". I also have other information
> from another source that I can't even discuss.
>
> This is not "one companys' word against another".
> Marcin and Bruce created non-malicious fake malware and created a signature
> pattern and included it in the MBAM Database. When IObit was found to
> detect this "never released" and "fake malware" using the detection name
> Marcin and Bruce created, there was no doubt. IOBit had plagiarized the
> database. This was a well thought out trap and IOBit fell right into it.

I'm beginning to get that feeling I used to get when I was in the work
force returning from lunch and had to sit through another half day of a
boring seminar......yawn

--
Zo
Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.