From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:34:49 +0100, Baron
<baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

> Without water flowing in the pipes I wouldn't have heated
>radiators.

You prove MY point, idiot.

That pump is CONTINUOUSLY moving the medium that heats those radiators
through it.

It SITS inside a hot water tank to gain the heat from it.

That has NOTHING to do with any hot water line flowing.

Go find the hot water line feeding your washer. If you have not used
the washer in several hours, the pipe will be at ambient.

If there were a constant leak at the washer end, THEN the pipe would be
at the water heater tank temp.
From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:34:49 +0100, Baron
<baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

>
>I rather think that example suggests that heat transfer can take place
>between two pipes.


Not the level you claimed.

You fail to understand that once the water is flowing NO local heating
takes place.
From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:39:51 +0100, Baron
<baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

>OK ! Start by stating the reasons for and against.


Houses in cold regions are built specifically in such a way that there
are NO pipes EVER exposed to freezing temps, you utter idiot.

So there are NO design intentions that would use the thermal from the
hot side to "keep the cold side from freezing".

He is right, and you are an idiot.
From: Baron on
krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz Inscribed thus:

> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:34:49 +0100, Baron
> <baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>Copacetic Inscribed thus:
>
>>> Think before you refute. Otherwise you re-size your mouth with
>>> your
>>> foot.
>>
>>I don't think that you have said anything that proves me wrong.
>
> If you're agreeing with DimBulb, you're most likely wrong. DimBulb is
> particularly dense when it comes to thermodynamics (hence the name
> "DimBulb"). He's also known as AlwaysWrong, for good reason.
>
> I'll net MichaelT give you the complete list of Nymbecile's nyms (he's
> closing in on 100 of 'em), so you know who you're talking to, here, in
> the future.

He's good for a bit of chain yanking. :-)

--
Best Regards:
Baron.
From: Baron on
Archimedes' Lever Inscribed thus:

> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:39:51 +0100, Baron
> <baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>OK ! Start by stating the reasons for and against.
>
>
> Houses in cold regions are built specifically in such a way that
> there are NO pipes EVER exposed to freezing temps, you utter idiot.
>
> So there are NO design intentions that would use the thermal from
> the hot side to "keep the cold side from freezing".
>
> He is right, and you are an idiot.

Meaningless dribble.

--
Best Regards:
Baron.