If D from BC were a plumber:
in [Design]
|
Prev: Will heating the platters beyond curie temp make disk-splicing impossible?
Next: Will heating the platters beyond curie temp make disk-splicing impossible?
From: Archimedes' Lever on 17 Apr 2010 16:21 On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:06:59 +0100, Baron <baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote: >krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz Inscribed thus: > >> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:34:49 +0100, Baron >> <baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote: >> >>>Copacetic Inscribed thus: >> >>>> Think before you refute. Otherwise you re-size your mouth with >>>> your >>>> foot. >>> >>>I don't think that you have said anything that proves me wrong. >> >> If you're agreeing with DimBulb, you're most likely wrong. DimBulb is >> particularly dense when it comes to thermodynamics (hence the name >> "DimBulb"). He's also known as AlwaysWrong, for good reason. >> >> I'll net MichaelT give you the complete list of Nymbecile's nyms (he's >> closing in on 100 of 'em), so you know who you're talking to, here, in >> the future. > >He's good for a bit of chain yanking. :-) KRW is not good for anything, and you sucking up to his retarded horseshit means that you aren't good for much either, asswipe.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 17 Apr 2010 16:23 On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:12:07 +0100, Baron <baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote: >Archimedes' Lever Inscribed thus: > >> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:39:51 +0100, Baron >> <baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote: >> >>>OK ! Start by stating the reasons for and against. >> >> >> Houses in cold regions are built specifically in such a way that >> there are NO pipes EVER exposed to freezing temps, you utter idiot. >> >> So there are NO design intentions that would use the thermal from >> the hot side to "keep the cold side from freezing". >> >> He is right, and you are an idiot. > >Meaningless dribble. You claiming that ANY engineer in the world would design house plumbing that nests pipes together to keep one from freezing is what constitutes meaningless dribble.
From: Baron on 17 Apr 2010 16:24 Copacetic Inscribed thus: > On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:44:54 +0100, Baron > <baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote: > >>Its quite common to lag together both hot and cold pipes for a common >>run. The idea is that the hot water flow prevents the cold water >>freezing in its pipe and causing a burst. > > > and this is true, even in colder climates, and > would ONLY work if the hot side was kept flowing at all times at each > endpoint it is carried to. Which in central heating systems it often is. > As soon as flow ceases, the hot begins moving toward the local > ambient temp all the way back to the water heater itself. I don't disagree. > Basic common sense. Yes ! -- Best Regards: Baron.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 17 Apr 2010 16:25 On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:59:44 -0700 (PDT), mpm <mpmillard(a)aol.com> wrote: > >I am leaning towards the trashed valve notion myself... (?) Turn on all hot. Got flow? Turn on all cold. Got flow? If the answer to both questions is "yes" then you do not have a mixing valve problem.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 17 Apr 2010 16:33
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:15:30 -0400, "Paul E. Schoen" <paul(a)pstech-inc.com> wrote: > ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message >news:ndmjs51archlmttsoagticndmi645jibjg(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 07:20:02 -0700 (PDT), mpm <mpmillard(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>>Another options is to just stop taking baths altogether. >>>...though I'm not sure my clients, friends and family would appreciate >>>that! >> >> No need to go that far. Don't turn on the hot water and your hysteresis >> is >> fixed. Simple. > >Also a cheap male contraceptive :) > >Paul How so, idiot? The cold is good for yer nuts. The hot is bad. That is why we grow them on the outside. So, if he is NOT turning on the hot side, how is there any contraception? Besides, I am still trying to get past why his clients, family, and friends would be mad that he is no longer taking showers with them. :-) |