Is MBAM is a 100% safe application?
in [Spyware]
|
From: ~BD~ on 2 May 2010 20:43 David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hot.mail.co.uk> > > > >>> You lack honor and discipline. > > | No - I don't. > > Yes - You do! You are entitled to an opinion - even when you are wrong! > | In fact, the 'Management' at Malwarebytes, by choosing not to > | correspond, have shown very poor management skills. > > The management skills of Malwarebytes are excellent as they properly and judiciously > enforced the rules YOU agreed to abide by. > > http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules > > Terms of Use: > > "You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, > sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. In addition > you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment spam (injecting a > comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a website offering the > same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this website), the use of > signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web traffic to a site of > interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples. This includes the > Personal Message feature." > Which one (or more) of these words do *you* think best describes the fun picture, David? abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented ** I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all. FWIW -- Dave
From: David H. Lipman on 2 May 2010 20:46 From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hot.mail.co.uk> | sexually-oriented | ** | I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO | rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to | banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all. You were given two chances. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: JD on 2 May 2010 21:31 David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hot.mail.co.uk> > > | sexually-oriented > > | ** > > | I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO > | rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to > | banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all. > > You were given two chances. > Each time you reply, he comes back with more ignorant bs. He's a fool asking for others to not be foolish. He seeks the real truth but he speaks in lies. If you stop replying to boater Dave maybe he'll go away. Maybe. God I hope so. Probably not. But it's worth a try. 8-) -- JD..
From: David H. Lipman on 2 May 2010 21:53 From: "JD" <JD(a)example.invalid> | David H. Lipman wrote: >> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hot.mail.co.uk> >> | sexually-oriented >> | ** >> | I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO >> | rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to >> | banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all. >> You were given two chances. | Each time you reply, he comes back with more ignorant bs. He's a fool | asking for others to not be foolish. He seeks the real truth but he | speaks in lies. If you stop replying to boater Dave maybe he'll go away. | Maybe. God I hope so. Probably not. | But it's worth a try. 8-) Thank you. You are right. I was about to reply but, I read this post and canceled the post. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: JD on 2 May 2010 22:52
David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "JD"<JD(a)example.invalid> > > | David H. Lipman wrote: >>> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hot.mail.co.uk> > >>> | sexually-oriented > >>> | ** > >>> | I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO >>> | rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to >>> | banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all. > >>> You were given two chances. > > > | Each time you reply, he comes back with more ignorant bs. He's a fool > | asking for others to not be foolish. He seeks the real truth but he > | speaks in lies. If you stop replying to boater Dave maybe he'll go away. > | Maybe. God I hope so. Probably not. > > | But it's worth a try. 8-) > > Thank you. You are right. > I was about to reply but, I read this post and canceled the post. > > Thank you. Lets see what happens. -- JD.. |