Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Nov 2006 08:49 In article <4551EA1F.E3590169(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >> >You cant have it both ways. >> >> Tying up the military in babysitting jobs is doing nothing useful. > >On the contrary. Sometimes it's very useful / effective indeed. > > >> That seemed to be Clinton's style. I never understood it because >> this approach did not work with Germany. > >Explain what you mean about Germany. Germany was put into a cage when they surrendered WWI. Keeping a country permanently caged never works long term. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Nov 2006 08:53 In article <e81a6$4551f94f$4fe75b2$14650(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> In article <MPG.1fb90e071de0287c989aa6(a)news.individual.net>, >> krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >> >>>In article <454F423C.3B207DEE(a)hotmail.com>, >>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>> >>>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into >>>>>>an airframe manufacturing enterprise are gone. >>>>> >>>>>No, it's not. >>>> >>>>Do please supply an appropriate example. >>> >>>Hewlett Packard, Apple, Mc$hit, Dell... Who knows where the next >>>one will pop up. >>> >> >> >> He'll object to that because they're too old. Google, E-bay, >> Vehix(sp?). I can imagine a day where you login to General >> Motors and fill out the specs for the car you want and have >> it delivered in n days. I'd like to see this done with books ;-). >> IOW, mass production will become blase for anything other than >> computer equipment :-))). > >I object because they're not heavy industry. Now define heavy industry. Do you consider chip makers heavy industry? Or do you think that heavy industry are places where the workers have to get so dirty they can't wash it off. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Nov 2006 08:55 In article <d403b$455203d0$4fe75b2$14905(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >krw wrote: > >> In article <e81a6$4551f94f$4fe75b2$14650(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >> unsettled(a)nonsense.com says... >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>>>In article <MPG.1fb90e071de0287c989aa6(a)news.individual.net>, >>>> krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>In article <454F423C.3B207DEE(a)hotmail.com>, >>>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into >>>>>>>>an airframe manufacturing enterprise are gone. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No, it's not. >>>>>> >>>>>>Do please supply an appropriate example. >>>>> >>>>>Hewlett Packard, Apple, Mc$hit, Dell... Who knows where the next >>>>>one will pop up. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>He'll object to that because they're too old. Google, E-bay, >>>>Vehix(sp?). I can imagine a day where you login to General >>>>Motors and fill out the specs for the car you want and have >>>>it delivered in n days. I'd like to see this done with books ;-). >>>>IOW, mass production will become blase for anything other than >>>>computer equipment :-))). >>> >>>I object because they're not heavy industry. >> >> >> So what? Are they not new opportunities that people have made >> kagillions? > >Let's see how smart you really are. I'll give you the >elements I think important. > >A) To provide for the common welfare. > >B) In the United States, what is the distribution > of socio-economic class > >C) Taking a high tech biz like Google, what sort > of people do they employ, ie, what's the > distribution > You are too restrictive. Consider all the business those who use Google do. You can't just count Google's P&L statement here because the serives they provide allow other people and businesses to make oodles more. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Nov 2006 08:59 In article <4551EB0B.AC6BB784(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >" The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into an airframe >> >manufacturing enterprise are gone. " >> >> Good grief. Pendantic. > >Seeking clarity. > > >> Yep. Nowadays, nobody has to wait for >> their parents to die before making oddles of money. > >Most ppl aren't capable of making oodles of money. > In today's global economy, lots more people have the opportunity to make lots of money. And they don't even have to think of something new. All they have to do is not spend what they make on expense items. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Nov 2006 09:00
In article <4551EB8F.9E5BD7AD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >To be fair, Dell's 22 years old. >> >> I have other examples in another post. From Keith's and my POV, >> 22 years in the computing biz is young, very young. > >And I could say it's very old. > >How many dedicated DSP processors existed 22 yrs ago for example ? Your definition of DSP, please. /BAH |