From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >" The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into an airframe
> >> >manufacturing enterprise are gone. "
> >>
> >> Good grief. Pendantic.
> >
> >Seeking clarity.
> >
> >> Yep. Nowadays, nobody has to wait for
> >> their parents to die before making oddles of money.
> >
> >Most ppl aren't capable of making oodles of money.
>
> In today's global economy, lots more people have the opportunity
> to make lots of money. And they don't even have to think of
> something new. All they have to do is not spend what they make
> on expense items.

If only it were that simple !

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >To be fair, Dell's 22 years old.
> >>
> >> I have other examples in another post. From Keith's and my POV,
> >> 22 years in the computing biz is young, very young.
> >
> >And I could say it's very old.
> >
> >How many dedicated DSP processors existed 22 yrs ago for example ?
>
> Your definition of DSP, please.

Digital Signal Processor.

Think especially of devices with hardwired fast very wide multiply accumulate
function.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote:

> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > These people came from an economic system where the only property
> > owners (I think) were farms. The only people who knew how to
> > make things go were property owners. When the above people envisioned
> > the manufacturing and industrial revolution, did they also anticipate
> > where people would only own 1/8 acre with a hut on it?
>
> You mean like all of the people in Europe who lived in the cities already
> had?

I'll bet my place here has a lot less than 1/8 of an acre !

Graham

From: Eeyore on


lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote:

> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> In addition, people burn the wood that is laced with arsenic.
> >>
> >>What kind of wood is laced with arsenic ?
> >
> > Any wood you want to prevent termintes from eating.
>
> Not any more, at least not new wood.

What do they use now ?

Graham

From: Eeyore on


lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote:

> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >>Why your desparate need to "make everybody do" things. Why not just let
> >>them make their own decisions, and you make yours?
> >
> > Because there are never "do not burn" stamps on wood filled
> > with arsenic. Because there isn't any pollution controls
> > on burning wood. The ones who "sin" the worst are those
> > who are rabid anti-smokers of cigarettes, consider the need
> > for oil to be a mortal sin, and are against nuclear power plants.
> >
> > Yet these people have no problems with filling a whole neighborhood
> > with smoke and arsenic. This is another example of perfection
> > of inability to think.
>
> Why do you presume that it is the anti-smokers who burn pressure-treated
> lumber illegally? That is a rather illogical, quite misanthropic, and
> *very* disingenuous assumption.

Just add it to the list !

Graham