From: Ken Smith on
In article <98447$45672ede$49ecf18$343(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>,
unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>> In article <ca70$45662b70$4fe7352$26883(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>,
>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>> No, just making a point about insults.
>
>Hardly. You selected a side in an argument that had nothing
>to do with you.

If you took it that way, I apologize. That was not my intent.

The point I was trying to make is that people should at least try to make
their insults entertaining for the rest of the readers.

The lurkers are the ones that both sides have a chance to convince. You
can't convince them if they get bored and quit reading. IIRC I made this
point somewhere in the first week of this thread.



--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: Ken Smith on
In article <piP9h.6343$yf7.4809(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.net>,
<lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[....]
>Leave it to Unsettled to fail to understand a point about insults.

That was a boring way to respond.

>
>Eric Lucas
>
>


--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: Eeyore on


unsettled wrote:

> Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
> > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>"Quite" - barking towards the end. There is no love for Thatcher in
> >>>Wales, for example. Less then for Beeching, in faact.
> >>
> >>Her idea of running the economy using 'corner shop' economics was a total
> >>disaster.
> >
> >
> > Although one could argue that the coal mining industry in Wales was
> > reaching the end of the line in the 70's and 80's, due to cheap EU
> > imports of coal - what was more galling was the fact that there were no
> > contingency plans set up by government. Her government simply shut up
> > shop in Wales without any investment in replacement/alternatives.
>
> Good Lord! You mean the cradle to grave gravy train ended?

Mining was hardly a gravy train.

Graham

From: Phineas T Puddleduck on
In article <45686CC4.DA2FE2C9(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> > > Although one could argue that the coal mining industry in Wales was
> > > reaching the end of the line in the 70's and 80's, due to cheap EU
> > > imports of coal - what was more galling was the fact that there were no
> > > contingency plans set up by government. Her government simply shut up
> > > shop in Wales without any investment in replacement/alternatives.
> >
> > Good Lord! You mean the cradle to grave gravy train ended?
>
> Mining was hardly a gravy train.
>
> Graham

Of course it was, those miners went down in fur-lined elevators to
recline in comfy settee's and watch daytime TV.

Ignoring the fact that Welsh coal and steel built most of the British
Empire, of course.



(quick rule of thumb - Unsettled is an idiot)

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: Ken Smith on
In article <6mpgm2p3fhibvke3euu0tcgblrbkl7aakr(a)4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:22:43 +0000, Eeyore
><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
[....]
>>Whereas you 'know' what you've been told / indoctrinated to believe.
>
>---
>Would you have him believe _that_?

It would be healthier if he decided to assume it for a while and see where
the thinking leads him. He can then make the choice about believing it
for logical reasons. Taking such things on as a matter of faith is not
healthy.
--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge