From: Ken Smith on 25 Nov 2006 11:11 In article <98447$45672ede$49ecf18$343(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: >> In article <ca70$45662b70$4fe7352$26883(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>> >> No, just making a point about insults. > >Hardly. You selected a side in an argument that had nothing >to do with you. If you took it that way, I apologize. That was not my intent. The point I was trying to make is that people should at least try to make their insults entertaining for the rest of the readers. The lurkers are the ones that both sides have a chance to convince. You can't convince them if they get bored and quit reading. IIRC I made this point somewhere in the first week of this thread. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 25 Nov 2006 11:14 In article <piP9h.6343$yf7.4809(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: [....] >Leave it to Unsettled to fail to understand a point about insults. That was a boring way to respond. > >Eric Lucas > > -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 11:18 unsettled wrote: > Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>"Quite" - barking towards the end. There is no love for Thatcher in > >>>Wales, for example. Less then for Beeching, in faact. > >> > >>Her idea of running the economy using 'corner shop' economics was a total > >>disaster. > > > > > > Although one could argue that the coal mining industry in Wales was > > reaching the end of the line in the 70's and 80's, due to cheap EU > > imports of coal - what was more galling was the fact that there were no > > contingency plans set up by government. Her government simply shut up > > shop in Wales without any investment in replacement/alternatives. > > Good Lord! You mean the cradle to grave gravy train ended? Mining was hardly a gravy train. Graham
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 25 Nov 2006 11:21 In article <45686CC4.DA2FE2C9(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Although one could argue that the coal mining industry in Wales was > > > reaching the end of the line in the 70's and 80's, due to cheap EU > > > imports of coal - what was more galling was the fact that there were no > > > contingency plans set up by government. Her government simply shut up > > > shop in Wales without any investment in replacement/alternatives. > > > > Good Lord! You mean the cradle to grave gravy train ended? > > Mining was hardly a gravy train. > > Graham Of course it was, those miners went down in fur-lined elevators to recline in comfy settee's and watch daytime TV. Ignoring the fact that Welsh coal and steel built most of the British Empire, of course. (quick rule of thumb - Unsettled is an idiot) -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Ken Smith on 25 Nov 2006 11:23
In article <6mpgm2p3fhibvke3euu0tcgblrbkl7aakr(a)4ax.com>, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:22:43 +0000, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> [....] >>Whereas you 'know' what you've been told / indoctrinated to believe. > >--- >Would you have him believe _that_? It would be healthier if he decided to assume it for a while and see where the thinking leads him. He can then make the choice about believing it for logical reasons. Taking such things on as a matter of faith is not healthy. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge |