Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 25 Nov 2006 09:19 In article <phineaspuddleduck-6DC9F9.14143025112006(a)free.teranews.com>, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >In article <ek9ijm$8qk_006(a)s1007.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >Scottish Law is different actually ! It has its own Parliament too as will >> >Northern Ireland when the 'Loyalists' and Republicans can get their act >> together >> >again. >> >> I thought those places based their politics on ideas started >> with the Magna Carta. If they don't, then they do not a uniform >> basis. > >There is a varying degree of autonomy in the four nations that make up >the Uk. I live in one of them (Wales) with a National Assembly that has >secondary legislative powers and some primary legislative powers (now) >in a limited field. > >Hence whey they are able to vary their legislation to take into account >of different local conditions. > My statement about a uniform political basis did not mean that all were exactly alike. Was this really not written clearly enough? /BAH
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 09:24 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> I'm told > >> >> >> >> that a successful socialist economy is in Sweden. I have to study > >> >> >> >> that. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >It's called social democracy. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I know. The fact that the word democracy has to be included gives > >> >> >> me a slight warning. > >> >> > > >> >> >And your fear of democracy doesn't surprise me. > >> >> > >> >> <ahem> The word democracy is included in a political party's name > >> >> for the same reason the word "science" is put into Computer Science > >> >> degree's name. > >> > > >> >Shame they don't have one for 'hands in the till' for the Republicans then > ! > >> > >> What makes you think that the Republicans are the only ones who > >> take money? My state is now pure Democrat. They've had their > >> hands in everybody's pockets for decades. > > > >The Republicans do it on the grand scale. > > No, honey. YOu've been listening to Democrat rhetoric. Actually no. > One > of their tactics, is to get people to believe that there > is a serious class structure in the US and that the Republicans > are the "rich" who steal from the "poor". This tactic works > because the modertately rich believe they are the "poor" and > that those mean rich guys should be giving their money to > them. > > This stupid political party is seeding the grapes of wrath > which will result in coast to coast riots when everybody who > believes the "rich" stole from them gets their revenge. See below about Bechtel and Halliburton. They were paid with taxpayers money. Graham > /BAH > > > > >Heck, they even go to war so Bechtel and Halliburton can pick up uncontested > >contracts. > > > >Graham
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 25 Nov 2006 09:26 In article <ek9jcn$8qk_002(a)s1007.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >There is a varying degree of autonomy in the four nations that make up > >the Uk. I live in one of them (Wales) with a National Assembly that has > >secondary legislative powers and some primary legislative powers (now) > >in a limited field. > > > >Hence whey they are able to vary their legislation to take into account > >of different local conditions. > > > My statement about a uniform political basis did not mean that > all were exactly alike. Was this really not written clearly enough? They do NOT have a uniform political basis tho. -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 09:26 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >I wasn't suggesting changing the constitution per se ! > > > >I'm sure each state could run its own baby-NHS quite effectively and that > >would then overcome your objections to size and scale too. > > I'm sure each state could not. Why not ? Give a reasoned answer that isn't based on dogma and rhetoric if you can. > However, I will find out since > Massachusetts has made the first step of forcing everybody > to have insurance. > > >Over here we also have regional management of our NHS as in the 4 countries, > >England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. > > > >This doesn't affect the patient in any significant way.. > > You are blind. You're blind to facts. Graham
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 25 Nov 2006 09:28
In article <phineaspuddleduck-DA5DCC.14260525112006(a)free.teranews.com>, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > They do NOT have a uniform political basis tho. To add. Although the act of Union between England and Wales meant that Welsh Law (codified mainly by Hywel Dda) was superceded by English Law (even though in a lot of ways Hywel's laws were better) - the act of Union between Scotland and England did not - there is a wealth of Scottish law that is unique to them. -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |