Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 25 Nov 2006 16:40 "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:phineaspuddleduck-8A70B9.21181025112006(a)free.teranews.com... > In article <MPG.1fd263c4e7918985989c9d(a)news.individual.net>, > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > >> Just plonk the duck. He's never come close to write anything worth >> reading. > > But yet you have to make that comment. Something tells me there's a > little projection there, maroon... Terrible that people dare disagree > with you ;-) He wont be the first argumentative crank to give up and kill file you :-)
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 25 Nov 2006 16:42 In article <Ls-dnZRLjKdkKvXYnZ2dnUVZ8smdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > I certainly agree on that. "Chavs" have a tendency to crop up most in the > areas most affected by Thacherite policies. It seems to be a rebellion to the way things were done. You have the worst of both systems. The right wing view that everything now disallowed is permissible, and the left wing view that the state should mollycoddle you. Add that to a fanatical hatred of anything not "local" and "familar" and you have a chav. I'm left of centre myself. I can see the need for the state to keep checks and balances, but human nature sometimes really makes me cry! -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 25 Nov 2006 16:43 In article <FeCdnVXOutXIJfXYRVnyvg(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:phineaspuddleduck-8A70B9.21181025112006(a)free.teranews.com... > > In article <MPG.1fd263c4e7918985989c9d(a)news.individual.net>, > > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > > > >> Just plonk the duck. He's never come close to write anything worth > >> reading. > > > > But yet you have to make that comment. Something tells me there's a > > little projection there, maroon... Terrible that people dare disagree > > with you ;-) > > He wont be the first argumentative crank to give up and kill file you :-) And like the rest, I won't lose any sleep over it. His posting history peaks at abysmal and declines quickly. -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: T Wake on 25 Nov 2006 16:50 "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:phineaspuddleduck-416009.21422525112006(a)free.teranews.com... > In article <Ls-dnZRLjKdkKvXYnZ2dnUVZ8smdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >> I certainly agree on that. "Chavs" have a tendency to crop up most in the >> areas most affected by Thacherite policies. > > It seems to be a rebellion to the way things were done. You have the > worst of both systems. The right wing view that everything now > disallowed is permissible, and the left wing view that the state should > mollycoddle you. Add that to a fanatical hatred of anything not "local" > and "familar" and you have a chav. > > I'm left of centre myself. I can see the need for the state to keep > checks and balances, but human nature sometimes really makes me cry! Prior to getting embroiled in this thread, I thought I was fairly right of centre. I now see the error in my ways and I am firmly left of centre now. I suspect half the apparently right wing extremists posting on this thread live very different lives away from USENET. I wonder if Americans have chavs.
From: krw on 25 Nov 2006 16:50
In article <u3hc42r2t5ai$.wjrbca3gkvct.dlg(a)40tude.net>, MathFreakNoMore(a)FakeAddress.com says... > On Sat, 25 Nov 06 14:25:30 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com > wrote: > > > Another thing I assumed was possible is that reasoned discussion > > between opposing parties is possible and can solve all diagreements. > > I was a fool to think this and have corrected my basic assumptions. > > Hehe :) No you've just come to know a little the rat > that you are :) > > Bahciv, stupid now, I'm certain you've been stupid all > of those years! > > "Opposing parties." Oh what a ... nope, I don't have > time for you. Good. Bye now. -- Keith |