Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 25 Nov 2006 17:54 "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:phineaspuddleduck-A4227F.22334125112006(a)free.teranews.com... > In article <MPG.1fd28e4b92c5a97989cc1(a)news.individual.net>, > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > >> No, you're a left-wing extremist, right there with the dumb donkey. >> This isn't surprising since you're both socialist Europeons. >> >> > I wonder if Americans have chavs. >> >> Haven't a clue what it is, nor an interest in googling it. > > Wow, you're a special little snowflake aren't you. You wouldn't know > left wing if someone bit you. > > Now please run along, us adults are talking. It is funny, he doesn't know what the reference is towards, he has nothing to add but _still_ has to post *something*. Bit like the four legs, two legs going over his head and becoming a sexual reference. I am sure that is just a Freudian slip on his behalf.
From: Jamie on 25 Nov 2006 17:59 John Fields wrote: > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:05:38 +0000, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> >>unsettled wrote: >> >> >>>Our post offices are also open till 5PM in most places. >> >>Is that supposed to be some kind of special US achievement ? Ours stay open later >>than that ! > > > --- > That's because they're so inefficient they have to. > > :)) good one! -- "I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 25 Nov 2006 18:08 In article <BN6dnaqAE-deVPXYRVnygw(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > It is funny, he doesn't know what the reference is towards, he has nothing > to add but _still_ has to post *something*. > > Bit like the four legs, two legs going over his head and becoming a sexual > reference. I am sure that is just a Freudian slip on his behalf. That was pretty priceless... ;-) -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Jamie on 25 Nov 2006 18:15 Eeyore wrote: > > T Wake wrote: > > >>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> >>>krw wrote: >>> >>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>>> >>>>>krw wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>>>krw wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Once again, I'll ask you to think about administering your >>>>>>>>>>>NHS to all of Europe. That is how the US has to work. >>>>>>>>>>>We essentially 50 countries, each has its own politics, >>>>>>>>>>>economy and different priority lists. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>It is a shame you have such a low opinion of the American >>>>>>>>>>people. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>It's also quite a shame that she has such a lack of >>>>>>>>>understanding of the US >>>>>>>>>Constitution, to think that no national program is possible. >>>>>>>>>There are >>>>>>>>>plenty of national programs in the US, and they work fine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>All (not operated through the states) are unconstitutional, as >>>>>>>>well. None come close to 17% of the GNP either, though you'd >>>>>>>>likely be all for nationalizing the oil companies too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>What would be the point of that ? >>>>>> >>>>>>It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why >>>>>>don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? >>>>> >>>>>Who said anything about nationalisation ? >>>> >>>>What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? >>>> >>>>Dumb donkey! >>> >>>The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. >> >>It strikes me that some people in this subthread are unable to tell the >>difference between "National" and "Nationalised" and every time they see one >>of the words it triggers the knee-jerk "socialism = bad" response. > > > They've been well indoctrinated ! > > > >>Explaining that a "National" Health Service is a service which provides >>health care nation wide on the basis of medical need not ability to pay >>seems to be falling on deaf ears. > > > There none so deaf as those who don't wish to hear. > > Graham > ah, you're finding coming to terms! -- "I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
From: Jamie on 25 Nov 2006 18:16
Eeyore wrote: > > T Wake wrote: > > >>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>unsettled wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Tell us, have you ever actually complained to >>>>one department of government about another? Have >>>>you ever tried to sue the government? >>> >>>The NHS get sued over here sometimes when things go wrong as of course >>>they occasionally do in any organisation. >>> >>>It's not difficult at all. And it doesn't involve suing the government >>>either, another daft idea you just invented. >> >>I have complained about various departments in the government on several >>occasions. No problem with it at all. I provide a contract service to the >>government and if they breach it, I wouldn't hesitate to take legal action. >> >>Unsettled seems to think the US government is inherently corrupt and that it >>is not responsive to the will of the people. Odd really, as I thought the US >>was a democracy. > > > It [the USA] would appear to be a murky place with little accountability. > > They need to learn a few things from us. > > Graham > > LOL, and what is that? -- "I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5 |