Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 9 Jan 2007 07:11 Ken Smith wrote: > In article <9dp5q2h1eboobfg5rjl4j33tp6cdj699mb(a)4ax.com>, > MassiveProng <MasiveProng(a)yourhiney.org> wrote: > [...] > >>They do not tap or monitor unwarranted, dumbass. >> >> THE COMPUTER listens for key words and phrases, > > > Did you just contradict your self? It sure looks like it to me. In order > to connect "THE COMPUTER", you need a tap. You'll find that quite often a technical term is not the same as a legal term even when using the same word.
From: unsettled on 9 Jan 2007 07:14 Ken Smith wrote: > In article <entn7b$8qk_003(a)s947.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>In article <entkvo$kr2$1(a)blue.rahul.net>, >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > > [... access to information ...] > >>A person can learn without access. > > > No they can't. Without information input there is no learning. Another of those abbreviated sentence difficulties where what she wrote isn't the complete thought. We've been discussing access to written knowledge. >> However, each person has >>to make the same mistakes. > If I hit my thumb with a hammer, I quickly recieve the information that it > is a bad idea. If there is no feedback from actions, you can't identify > mistakes. Picky picky.
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Jan 2007 07:08 In article <9dp5q2h1eboobfg5rjl4j33tp6cdj699mb(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Mon, 08 Jan 07 11:29:53 GMT, lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave >us: > >>In article <enqp0r$8ss_012(a)s980.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>In article <459FA66F.2CB0CFEC(a)hotmail.com>, >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >It is however pretty clear to me that a former g/f of mine had her >>land >>>>> >> >line tapped for being active in CND. It was hilariously obvious. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> So you've already realized that privacy does not include landlines. >>>>> >> Why do you think it is going to include broadcasts over thru the air? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I don't understand this logic. >>>>> > >>>>> >That tap would have needed a warrant though. >>>>> >>>>> And the tap gets one; it's the law. >>>> >>>>Your taps don't need warrants any more though do they ? >>> >>>Yes, they do require warrants. Perhaps you should stop >>>confusing tapping with monitoring. >>> >>>/BAH >> >>So if you don't tap, how do you monitor? > > > They do not tap or monitor unwarranted, dumbass. > > THE COMPUTER listens for key words and phrases, and those text >strings the COMPUTER feels MIGHT warrant further inspection get human >ears, still without any names or source or destination info. IF the >human listener agrees with the computer that actual conversation >monitoring is needed, THEN an instant warrant is issued by a duly >appointed authority on the spot. AT THAT TIME, monitoring begins, and >it is with a warrant. Therefore, no MONITORING (read unwarranted >listening by humans of a SPECIFIC individual) occurs UNTIL sound bytes >have been deemed worthy of ACTUAL monitoring. > > Maybe one of these years you'll finally get it. Ah, I was using the word monitoring incorrectly. I was using it to describe the sampling done by computers. Thank you for the correction. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Jan 2007 07:10 In article <entrjm$ose$4(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >In article <enqpqn$8qk_002(a)s980.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>In article <45A0E100.62E7E990(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>>> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>> >> >>>> >> So you've already realized that privacy does not include landlines. >>>> >> Why do you think it is going to include broadcasts over thru the air? >>>> >> >>>> >> I don't understand this logic. >>>> > >>>> >The tap would have been put in place _after_ a warrant was issued. Do you >>>> >see how that is different. >>>> >>>> And that's how it works today. There is a difference between a phone >>>> tap and sampling hundreds of sounds for certain utterances. >>> >>>No there isn't ! >> >>You should try to think this one through a little bit more. >>You might start with radio and TV transmissions. >> >>/BAH > >Which use the public airwaves. Not the same as a private conversation between >2 people on a phone. Now try to think just a little bit more. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Jan 2007 07:14
In article <45A30E31.A88B553F(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >Did you know that the original idea of Crisco btw was to make candles. It >> >only got sold as a 'food' as an afterthought. >> >> No, I didn't know that. Did you know that we used to chew candles >> because gum was too expensive? > >That sounds vile. Were they made of tallow ? Wax. /BAH |