Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 18 Jan 2007 09:01 In article <45AF7C4C.F054D7B3(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >> >> When Iran starts a war against some country >> >> in the West, where are you going to base your armies and air force? >> >> In England? >> > >> >More problematic is likely to be Iran's problem about where to base *their* >> >forces. >> > >> >LMAO ! >> >> If you try to think a little bit, Iran won't need to have >> bases in the beginning. > >Ah, the 'fifth column' you mean ? I don't know what you mean by that term. > >We've started putting them on trial and sending them to jail. Take another look at your recent history. Putting your local terrorists in jail didn't solve the problem. The bombing and messes just kept going and going and going. /BAH > >Graham >
From: jmfbahciv on 18 Jan 2007 09:03 In article <45AD055D.DE60C4B8(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >T Wake wrote: > >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> >> > Why do you people keep forgetting Syria? None seem to think >> > about Egypt. >> >> No one forgets Syria and people do think of about Egypt. As I pointed out to >> you in a previous post both those nations are important. > >< snip > > > >> Now on to some important questions which fall out of your post. Why do you >> keep forgetting about Tunisia? None seem to think of Morocco. > >Or Turkey even ? Yet another Muslim nation in the region. I have not forgotten Turkey. It is also currently under pressure to become more conservative. You should watch all the individual laws and policies that get passed and then unpassed. You really need to listen to the real news. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 18 Jan 2007 09:06 In article <45AF7CDB.689B2330(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> > >> >> Why do you people keep forgetting Syria? None seem to think >> >> about Egypt. >> > >> >No one forgets Syria and people do think of about Egypt. As I pointed out to >> >you in a previous post both those nations are important. >> > >> >From a military point of view Syria is almost a joke, Israel pretty much >> >ensures Syria is never going invade another country. Syria has no signs of >> >developing nuclear weapons. >> >> You are being foolish. They don't have to develop them; all >> they have to do is buy them or acquire them from a neighbor. > >Other than Pakistan who would that be ? Israel ! ? You really don't seem to be paying attention to what's going on. The guy in North Korea has already said he wants to sell some. /BAH
From: Eeyore on 18 Jan 2007 09:14 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > > >> >> Congress just passed a bill that cause all food processing to be > >> >> moved to foreign lands. > >> > > >> >Does this bill have a name ? > >> > >> I can't remember its title. What it does is raise the minimum > >> wage to $7.50/hour. > > > >That's not very much. It's less than in the UK in fact. > > > >Now, why do you think it will cause all food processing to be > >moved to foreign lands ? > > Because it's too much money to spend on labor. If food > processing can be done cheaper in other countries, the > food processors will move their canneries to those countries. No they won't. For a host of reasons it makes no sense to transport food over such long distances. How much do you think food processors currently pay then ? Graham
From: Ken Smith on 18 Jan 2007 09:14
In article <eonrl8$8qk_003(a)s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >In article <eoinmp$keo$2(a)blue.rahul.net>, > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>In article <eoilbd$8qk_003(a)s961.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>[....] >>>And the enemy of Western Civilization hasn't signed any of those >>>agreements. Perhaps you should consider that and spend at least >>>three days considering that. >> >>Keeping to the agreements and following their rules will allow the west to >>win. Breaking with them ensures a loss. The rules are part of the moral >>standard that the west stands for. They are the core of what will sway >>the "hearts and minds". Give them up and you fall into the terrorists >>trap. > >All that does is make you a martyr. If there isn't anybody >left to remember and admire your foolishness, it's all for >naught and the "bad guys" are still in power and running >the trade biz. You are claiming that the only way to win is to give up everything you are fighting for. This means you have lost already and are just planning to join the other side. I claim that that the only way to win is to defend the things you are fighting for. You call my suggestion foolishness so I'll call yours morally corrupt and short sighted. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge |