Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 5 Oct 2006 13:07 On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:10:38 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:03:12 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >JoeBloe wrote: >> >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:17:53 +0100, Eeyore Gave us: >> >> >> >> >US aid is frequently accompanied by compulsory 'trade concessions' that favour the >> >> >USA. >> >> >> >> Funny, I don't recall us ever asking Russia for anything for the >> >> millions of tons of wheat we have sent them over the last several >> >> decades. >> > >> >Why does Russia need 'aid' ? Why is it going there. Can't they pay for it? >> >> --- >> Why don't you do your own legwork? > >I'm asking you. --- No, you were asking Joe Bloe, but all you were looking for was a platform for your ingenuous bullshit. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 13:11 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ? > > Not only is it a threat, but it has already begun to > alter my lifestyle. My goal is to ensure that it > alter 100% of my lifestyle, if I'm allowed to exist. Tell me more about this threat you perceive. What exactly is it that you're afraid of ? Graham
From: John Fields on 5 Oct 2006 13:10 On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:14:58 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> > Actually no. They fight against those claiming to have legal jurisdiction >> > in the area. Also there is no requirement that it use terror methods either. >> >> This is pedantry. > >Not to me. It's a subtle but precise distinction. > >in?sur?gent? [in-sur-juhnt] ? noun >1. a person who rises in forcible opposition to lawful authority, esp. a person >who engages in armed resistance to a government or to the execution of its laws; >rebel. > >ter?ror?ism? [ter-uh-riz-uhm] ?noun >1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political >purposes. >2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization. >3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government. --- Now go look up pedant. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Michael A. Terrell on 5 Oct 2006 13:16 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > Sure. That's local politics and wonderful to use as smoke and > mirrors to distract your attention from the real threats. > > /BAH Local? I guess you don't keep up with the news. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 13:16
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: > >> > >> >Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush calling > a > >> >criticism "unacceptable." > >> > >> Which criticism was unacceptable? > > > >Watch this. > > I can't. I'm not going to the library for this one. Why do you need to go to the library ? Graham |