Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Michael A. Terrell on 5 Oct 2006 13:17 Daniel Mandic wrote: > > Michael A. Terrell wrote: > > > The jury is still out on that one. Its a hung jury. I hanged them > > myself. ;-) > > Hang 'em lower. :-) If they were any lower the gators would get them! ;-) -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Keith on 5 Oct 2006 13:22 In article <eg335h$5l0$10(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker(a)emory.edu says... > In article <eg2od9$8qk_004(a)s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >In article <VAVUg.13310$7I1.3298(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, > > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> > >>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > >>news:452415BE.DB0DBC1E(a)hotmail.com... > >>> > >>> > >>> Keith wrote: > >>> > >>>> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>>> > >>>> > And you think you can defeat 'radical Islam' with bombs and bullets ? > >>>> > >>>> I know there is no choice. Perhaps you want to submit? > >>> > >>> There is no need to 'submit' > >>> > >>> You're living in a perversely stupid fantasy paranoid world. > >> > >>It comes from the constant bombardment by Bush's fear-mongering--it's his > >>way of keeping power over people. > > > >I think you should start to listen to Bush instead of listening > >to other people supposedly repeating what Bush said. I would > >suggest you start with his January, 2006 TV speech. > > > >> People start to lose perspective on what > >>is happening and why. It really is a very powerful narcotic. > > > >People can also lose perspective if they assume that Bush > >is always wrong > > So what has he been right about? > > >and is the cause of all ills which is the > >only thing you hear from his political opposition. > > > >This causes a lot of people to overlook the fact that these > >same politicians do not intend to deal with the threat > >to the nation. > > > > Bush has increased the threat. His own NIE says so. You're in a fantasy land. ONE SENTENCE of the NIE report was leaked by the Democrats to try to discredit Bush. The four pages around that one sentence, later released, say exactly the opposite. Please get your "news" from someone other than Franken. -- Keith
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 13:23 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > > >Eeyore (a.k.a. the stuffed donkey) can. He's a two-faced Europeon. > > Do no dismiss this. It's going to be a serious problem because > Europe is going to expect the US to deal with the big mess > that will be made by these extremists. No. It's the USA that's making the big mess ( through sheer ignorance and stupidity ). In fact the mess is getting bigger as we speak. > In their zeal to prove > that Bush is bad, people who think this way will also assist > in making a mess for the sake of revenge. You're talking drivel. Graham
From: John Fields on 5 Oct 2006 13:21 On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:35:41 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:09:50 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:21:12 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> "It" being radical Islam, the goal, in my opinion, would be to >> >> >> convert everyone to Islam and have them be subject to control by >> >> >> Muslim jurists, the goal being total world domination by Islam. >> >> >> >> >> >> Refusal to convert would result in death. >> >> > >> >> >There is no entity called 'radical Islam'. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Just like there's no entity called 'white supremacists'. >> >> --- >> >> >> >> >Who exactly do you mean ? >> >> >> >> --- >> >> The members of Islam who would have no qualms about relieving you of >> >> your head if you refused to convert. >> > >> >Let me make this clearer. >> > >> >Who *exactly* do you mean ? >> >> --- >> What, you want _names_? > >That would be a start. Something more coherent than 'radical islam' for >example. --- Too bad a simple concept is so hard for you to grasp when it's other than American. For example, I'm sure you'd have no problem with radical white American supremacists. well, understanding the concept, that is. I'm sure you'd have a very _big_ problem with them otherwise. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 13:26
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > > >Criticizing Bush for his lack of thought is really criticizing Bush. > > > >Criticizing Bush for his 'thoughts' is really criticizing Cheney. > > All this rhetoric is a very nice way to ignore the existence > of a national threat. There is no serious national threat ! It's in your imagination. You're been cleverly programmed to believe in this phoney 'bogeyman'. Who is actually going to come and kill you in your bed do you think ? Graham |