Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Ken Smith on 24 Jan 2007 22:45 In article <4b867$45b7d141$4fe74e1$20240(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> In article <7539e$45b764bc$4fe7370$11158(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> [.....] >> >>>Unless they're held under conditions not acceptable to some >>>of our "friends" they'll continue with their program from >>>jail. >> >> >> This is simply false and I believe beneath you. > >For Christs sakes it has been done. The lawyer is in >prison for being the carrier. Get a grip already. You are the one who should get a grip. >These people need to be held under conditions which don't >allow any communication with the outside. That includes >prevention of contact with randomly chosen or appointed >lawyers and clergy. How much are you willing to give up in the name of some so called safety? All of it? >Your threshold of what constitutes torture and mine differ vastly. I guess they must. Some of the terrorists think that sawing someones head off while they are alive is just fine. I guess you would find friends among them. > >> You appear to be arguing that prisoners must be tortured to prevent them >> from continuing in their effort. Please tell me this isn't true. > >Whose standards are you using. > > > -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 24 Jan 2007 22:51 In article <ep7orq$8qk_002(a)s899.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: [....] >I have not heard of a case where a RICO complaint had no >bail set. Where would you expect to have heard it? There usually isn't any video of dead bodies of naked people so it won't get on the news. > >/BAH -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 24 Jan 2007 22:53 In article <99bfe$45b5ff6b$4fe7715$22034(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: [....] >Untrue. You keep coming back to "the US removed Saddam allowing >all the deaths to occur" then in the next breath say you're not >blaming the US. Billy-Bob opened the cage door on the rabid pitbull. He now says "but but but I didn't bite anyone". -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Michael A. Terrell on 24 Jan 2007 23:32 MassiveProng wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:09:36 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" > <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> Gave us: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > >> I'm talking about monitoring without interfering with the performance. > > > > > > You obviously know absolutely nothing about electronics. Its done > >every day, with the proper equipment. What do you think an > >oscilloscope, voltmeter, or frequency counter does? Yes, they may > >affect the circuit under test, but usually not enough to notice. > >Especially in low impedance circuits. > > Does anyone remember "Tempest" shielding measures? > > A car could sit out on the street and read your CRT display with the > right gear. > > Just not on the PCs I made for the big boys. Our screen glass alone > was over $400 each (at 17"), and it was just a thin glass with a > conductive optical coating and metallized edges! There were even "Tempest" rated printers. About 200 screws to hold the mu-metal and Monel/silicone rubber gaskets together. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: MassiveProng on 25 Jan 2007 03:51
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:22:15 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >Anything that has to pass European standards is pretty good. Canada's CSA was pertty strict about many things as well. We used to say they would throw it off the end of a dock , and if it survived, then they'd test it. |