Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 25 Jan 2007 11:12 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> It only takes one time to destroy London. > > > >The Nazis tried to destroy London with thousands of heavily armed planes and > >the V1 and V2 rockets and failed. > > > >I really don't think a few Muslims with flour bombs are going to do it do you ? > > All they need is a flu. Been reading the papers ? Even flu won't do it. Graham
From: jmfbahciv on 25 Jan 2007 11:14 In article <45B8C4A5.BCD7F27C(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> They [Europeans] can afford to make >> these errors because their governments assume the US will >> save them with its military might. > >What do we need your military might for ? I don't know. I suspect so the politicians can point at the US and call us the bad people when things don't go perfectly. Smoke and mirrors. /BAH
From: Eeyore on 25 Jan 2007 11:21 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:. > > > >> What if your judge has your opinion that there isn't any serious > >> threats by these terrorists? > > > >If the judge believes that, I'd be inclined to trust his opinion. > > > >You see in the UK there has to be a high standard of evidence before a charge > > is even brought in the first place. > > Exactly. Your chances of having a mess becomes more likely than > less likely. You're quite crazy. This country will not lock ppl up without any evidence. It's quite clear that the Islamists have already 'won' with you. You're quite happy to throw away all the checks and balances that prevent innocent ppl being jailed. Graham
From: jmfbahciv on 25 Jan 2007 11:16 In article <45B8C531.7FF0433D(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> jasen <jasen(a)free.net.nz> wrote: >> >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Please measure the miles between Israel and the Mediteranean. >> >> > >> >> >0 >> >> > >> >> >> Note the number of miles between Israel and the Suez Canal. >> >> > >> >> >about 120 at closest approach, 140 from Beersheba, 160 from Tel Aviv >> >> > >> >> >> Now consider that Iran does its atomic bomb testing on >> >> >> Israel soil. How long do you think the Canal will be closed? >> >> >> You may assume that Iran doesn't "miss" and take out the >> >> >> core of Egyptian commerce with the same single attack. >> >> > >> >> >at that range? a couple of months. >> >> >> >> Possibly, if all political winds blow exactly the correct way. >> >> I can't even guess the effects of no oil tankers delivering >> >> oil for a couple of months. From Thatcher's book about her >> >> government and the coal miners' strikes, England had about >> >> 3 months reserve. >> > >> >Of *COAL* ! >> >> Yes, child. If no oil is delivered, then your country >> will have to use its coal reserves. Right? > >Hey Granny, we don't have any coal reserves any more. We import coal now. > >The genius Thatcher saw to that by shutting the mines. Did she mention that in >her book too ? Yes. She wanted to shut the ones that weren't productive and were costing lots of money just to keep open. The unions didn't agree and shut down all of them with their strikes. Unions never have thought long-term. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 25 Jan 2007 11:18
In article <45B8C6E1.2FF9C5C0(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Having been in meetings where these FCC issues were >> discussed and hearing how DEC decided what we going to do >> with VT05s might give me the idea that I know what I'm talking >> about. > >You mean DEC *were* aware of the prblem after all ? > >That's not what you previously suggested. It wasn't a problem in 1972. /BAH |