Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 30 Jan 2007 15:11 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45BEA2BD.8FA25D2D(a)hotmail.com... > > > MassiveProng wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >> >Not that much really. >> >> I live here, dingledorf. It was and IS that much... really. >> >> During the height of the gouging, one of my former boss' bill was >> over $300 a month. He still pays over $100 a month. > > That's no big deal by UK standards. How much do you expect it to cost ? Blimey. I'd be furious if my electricty bills were �50 per month! >> Mine, in a one BR apt at that time, was over $120 a month. >> >> For my PC and a 15W light bulb, and my microwave. I think the frige >> ran constantly and screwed me. That was 580kW/h in 1 month. > > A PC and a 15W light bulb will use 290 kWh in a month if left on 24/7. > > You must have been doing a lot of cooking and your fridge must be very > inefficient to use that much. > > Graham > >
From: Eeyore on 30 Jan 2007 15:12 unsettled wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > unsettled wrote: > >>Eeyore wrote: > >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>>>kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > >>>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>unsettled wrote: > >>>>>>>Eeyore wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Attacking Iran would really let the genie out of the bottle. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Or contain it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>It makes as much sense as attacking a wasp's nest with a heavy stick. In > >>>>>>front of other wasps ! > >>>>> > >>>>>I'd say less. Iran will fall out of the hand of the extremists in the > >>>>>next 20 or so years if left alone. With Bush's help, they will maintain > >>>>>control for much longer than that. > >>>> > >>>>The West doesn't have 20 years. > >>> > >>>Says who apart from you? > >>> > >>>>What part of "using an atom bomb in a few years" do you not understand? > >>> > >>>They don't have a bomb now nor will they have one in a 'few years'. > >>> > >>>Iran clearly wants one not for offensive use ( that would be insane ) but to > >>>deter attack from the warmongering USA. > >> > >>You're the insane one. > > > > > > How about you explain a sane example of the offensive use of nuclear weapons ? > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki Only works whem one country has all the bombs. Try this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutually_Assured_Destruction Graham
From: T Wake on 30 Jan 2007 15:33 "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message news:epnm4l$df5$4(a)blue.rahul.net... > In article <45BE8D83.976CEBA6(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > [.....] >>> Same question could be asked of Cain and Abel. Although every time I try >>> asking priest or vicars they get annoyed with me. >> >>I just discovered he lived to be 950 yrs old too ! Maybe he was a space >>alien ? > > If you assume as I do that some confused months and years, he made it to > 79 which is old enough to get remarked on. This is close to special pleading. The holy text is specific enough at times, yet for something quite simple like days and nights it gets confused?
From: T Wake on 30 Jan 2007 15:38 "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message news:epnma3$df5$5(a)blue.rahul.net... > In article <DKudnaWCCsQ1qSPYRVnyigA(a)pipex.net>, > T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > [.....] >>Taking it to it's logical conclusion, it is actually all the fault of >>ug-nggg who hit gnh-hrg on the head in 12433BC. > > No, ug-nggg was completely justified in his actions gnh-hrg was making a > rock of mass distruction. ROTFLMAO.
From: T Wake on 30 Jan 2007 15:41
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:epne6r$8ss_002(a)s827.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45BE0B7D.D6FA8748(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >unsettled wrote: >>> > >>> >> Only losing nations and their executives ever face the >>> >> consequences. No nation or national executive engages >>> >> in war with the thought of losing. >>> > >>> >Hmmmm, well there's more than few in the UK who would like to see Tony > Blair >>> >prosecuted for war crimes. >>> >>> Under whose law? Islam's? >> >>Under British law you nitwit. Britain is a signatory to the Geneva > Conventions >>you know. > > So you want your political leaders to be punished for > trying to do their job. No. At most they would be punished for breaking the law. Do you feel a national leader is above or immune from the law? > That kind of thinking must > give lots of encouragement to those who intend to > destroy your lifestyle. Interesting how this conflicts with your previous assumptions that we[tinw] are all too subservient to our government to think without their direction. Which is it? |