Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Phil Carmody on 8 Feb 2007 04:57 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>>>>> I have. It is significant that England couldn't figure out how > >>>>>> to stop war rations until 3 decades after the warring stopped. > Your politicians were forcing England's industry and manufacturing > to make all of their own stuff. That's not rationing. > They couldn't buy technology > from outside the country. That's not rationing. > Besides this, industry had their > hands tied because they had to dump monies down the unions' > black holes. That's nothing to do with rationing. > What is a wonder is how well England has survived > this economically. Certainly not rationing. > Now, I know this is going to be hard for you to do but think just > a little bit. Knowing your ability to use words correctly, I can only presume by that you mean "have a cup of tea". Sure, thanks. Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: Phil Carmody on 8 Feb 2007 05:13 "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> writes: > "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message > news:eq8rv7$v7q$6(a)blue.rahul.net... > > In article <0LKdnfp6w6j5-VrYnZ2dnUVZ8seinZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > > T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >> > >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >>news:eq78ue$8qk_003(a)s1004.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > >>> In article <eq56kc$h3d$6(a)blue.rahul.net>, > >>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > >>>>In article <eq4ksf$8ss_009(a)s795.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > >>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>>>[......] > >>>>>Most of the code I wrote didn't do calculations. Most of OS > >>>>>code simply moves bits without error. > >>>> > >>>>Now that Windows is the most common OS, > >>> > >>> Except Windows isn't an OS. > >> > >>What is the OS on a windows XP machine then? What about a Windows Vista > >>machine? > > > > Vista is really a shell. It contains a bunch of XP code. Whenever OS > > like stuff needs to be done, Vista passes the command to the XP code. > > Which then passes it down to some Win98 code that fires up DOS and runs > > the operation through QBasic. This is why Vista needs so much RAM. > > Interesting. I hadn't read that there was Win98 / DOS code left over in XP. > Thanks. Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooosssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: MassiveProng on 8 Feb 2007 07:11 On 08 Feb 2007 11:57:21 +0200, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> Gave us: >Knowing your ability to use words correctly, I can only presume >by that you mean "have a cup of tea". Sure, thanks. That's a good one.
From: MassiveProng on 8 Feb 2007 07:19 On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 03:16:55 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us: >In article <0LKdnfp6w6j5-VrYnZ2dnUVZ8seinZ2d(a)pipex.net>, >T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>news:eq78ue$8qk_003(a)s1004.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> In article <eq56kc$h3d$6(a)blue.rahul.net>, >>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>>In article <eq4ksf$8ss_009(a)s795.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>[......] >>>>>Most of the code I wrote didn't do calculations. Most of OS >>>>>code simply moves bits without error. >>>> >>>>Now that Windows is the most common OS, >>> >>> Except Windows isn't an OS. >> >>What is the OS on a windows XP machine then? What about a Windows Vista >>machine? > >Vista is really a shell. All GUIs are, dipshit. > It contains a bunch of XP code. Yes, but it is incorporated into a completely new kernel write. > Whenever OS >like stuff needs to be done, Vista passes the command to the XP code. You're an idiot. This ain't Windows 95 over DOS, dumbass. >Which then passes it down to some Win98 code that fires up DOS and runs >the operation through QBasic. Bwuahahahahaha! > This is why Vista needs so much RAM. You're nuts! By your logic alone, "DOS" wouldn't know what to do with it, so your bullshit doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Imagine that. You're an idiot. Vista was a full rewrite of the NT paradigm with modern processor features expanded upon. No shell on an old version on top of yet another old OS. They (all gui run OSes) are ALL GUI shells OVER underlying operational activities. You'd have to be an absolute idiot to not know that.
From: jmfbahciv on 8 Feb 2007 07:45
In article <eqcqkn$1co$4(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >In article <OtidnQWNJOAtcVTYnZ2dnUVZ8qrinZ2d(a)pipex.net>, >T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >[.....] >>yes, but I am confused on terminology. With a Windows XP machine, what you >>do call the OS? > >The Linux on the other partition. ROTFL. Good one. /BAH |