Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 20 Feb 2007 18:15 On Mon, 19 Feb 07 14:18:38 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >In article <sdeht2prl7cmo2vs6be9g9htsoo3abm0hm(a)4ax.com>, > MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>On Sun, 18 Feb 07 13:54:49 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> >>> Now think >>>about a human whose banking data is on his system and he needs >>>to upgrade hard and/or software. You may wish to swallow a >>>Valium first before you think too much. >> >> >> Dumbshit. ALL of my banking data is in the BANK's database. >> >> I can securely and safely access it from ANY web capable computer >>ANYWHERE in the world. >> >> You couldn't BUY a clue. > >'Secure and safe' and 'world-wide access from any computer' are >orthogonal. > You're an idiot. You prove with each and every post you make that you are over a decade behind the rest of the world.
From: MassiveProng on 20 Feb 2007 18:15 On Mon, 19 Feb 07 14:23:17 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >No one is thinking about my assignment. You cannot restore your >bank balance that was saved yesterday or a year ago or 10 years >ago. My bank balance is at the bank, and the data surrounding it is stored on the same computers it has been on for years. You really need a clue in the worst way.
From: MassiveProng on 20 Feb 2007 18:15 On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:02:03 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >MassiveProng wrote: > >> I can boot Linux from a DVD and RUN it all day long, and I don't need to do >> ANY installation! > >That sounds interesting. > >Where can I get one ? > >Graham Knoppix.org It requires an NTFS (under windows) volume, and a download manager capable of large files (GetRight). 5.1.1 also on hundreds of mirrors. kernel.org has a fast link for us Amurikans.
From: MassiveProng on 20 Feb 2007 18:15 On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:57:32 -0800, The Ghost In The Machine <ewill(a)sirius.tg00suus7038.net> Gave us: >In sci.physics, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> > wrote >on Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:10:12 +0000 ><45D9BDD4.B68B994E(a)hotmail.com>: >> >> >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> The Ghost In The Machine <ewill(a)sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote: >>> > >>> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhd2lnCTWQM >>> > >>> >skipped horribly on initial load, but that looks to be >>> >more of a bandwidth problem than a CPU one. CPU utilization was >>> >slightly lower. >>> > >>> >SFW. Its main themes are apparently music, a school >>> >bus, and dancing. Replay was possible without skipping. >>> >Full screen utilized almost 90% of CPU, so that might be >>> >an issue. >>> > >>> >FWIW. >>> > >>> If this becomes a common usage, it sounds like a dedicated >>> processor will be installed. >> >> It's called the CPU. >> >> Graham >> > >The CPU is not a dedicated processor. > Sure it is. It is dedicated to processing everything the OS throws at it.
From: MassiveProng on 20 Feb 2007 18:15
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:06:20 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us: >In article <5c240$45d96d08$4fe71f9$16508(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >nonsense(a)unsettled.com <nonsense(a)unsettled.com> wrote: >>d.086(a)hotmail.com wrote: >>> Could you please terminate this thread. It's off topic and crossposted >>> to sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.electronics.design, sci.med The >>> discussion below is only about electronics design. Please start a new >>> thread in your own news group and give it a Subject heading >>> appropriate to the topic under discussion. Please no more 'Jihad needs >>> scientists'. It's offensive. >> >>That's nice. > >By posting that you did exactly the thing he was asking you not to do. I >really don't see why you did it after all he should get his way about what >happens on the usenet shouldn't he? > Said the idiot that also posted to all the same groups. |