Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 4 Mar 2007 08:11 In article <20dku29jsq6ahmd2ucqjrm0279atd4ll2r(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Sat, 03 Mar 07 13:22:49 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>There are plenty of data bases in today's online world that can never >>be taken off-line. > > >You're an idiot. You stopped thinking. Consider finance. Transportation, especially things like trains, planes, and some ships. Consider war objects. Consider NORAD. Consider power generating stations. Consider the networks and telecomm. /BAH
From: nonsense on 4 Mar 2007 08:25 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <48cku2dg872ekdnpgtu6u9phbndvhu92oo(a)4ax.com>, > MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > >>On Sat, 03 Mar 07 13:03:35 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> >> >>>In article <f3d56$45e8681e$49ecf0e$20166(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >>> "nonsense(a)unsettled.com" <nonsense(a)unsettled.com> wrote: >>> >>>>MassiveProng wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 02 Mar 07 12:25:31 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>In article <9abb5$45e6dbbb$4fe70c3$30531(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >>>>>> "nonsense(a)unsettled.com" <nonsense(a)unsettled.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In article <epccu25dvaomn9ak8i5fmq0lks6prbbtuh(a)4ax.com>, >>>>>>>> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Aren't you out of vital bodily fluids yet? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This is what happens when you free the serfs. >>>>>> >>>>>>Even serfs have been toilet trained and know the best >>>>>>use of those other fluids. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Your senility is showing again, witch. Don't you have a grave site >>>>>or an urn of ashes to talk to? Do you really feel so compelled to try >>>>>to talk to us? If you're such a bit god, invent something! >>>> >>>>Well here's one that was/is incapable of learning toilet >>>>skills. >>> >>>It is clear that he needs adult supervision of the >>>maternal kind. >> >> More immature petty baby bullshit. You have succeeded in letting >>the Unlearned Tard drag you down to its level. Congratulations. > > > Your congratualtions are premature. I have yet to achieve his level > of thinking ability. It's a fine goal. Thank you. However IMO we're merely displaced on the same plateau.
From: Phil Carmody on 4 Mar 2007 09:14 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > In article <esc6m4$atc$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > >In article <esbpio$8qk_004(a)s977.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>In article <es9djf$q95$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, > >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > >[....] > >>>>You are in error. Last access is an important datum. > >>> > >>>Please explain exactly how you thing the last access is important. > >> > >>[This is the piece I inadventently deleted] > >> > >>> What > >>>do you do with this information? > >> > >>I, the BACKUP programmer, will save all files during an incremental > >>that has an access date after the date-time argument of the /SINCE > >>switch. > > > >This makes it no longer an "incremental". You are in fact doing a partial > >save on the system. > > That is what an incremental is. > > > The mere fact that you do something that is not an > >incremental and call that an incremental, doesn't make you right about any > >of the things you've posted on the subject. > > You are telling the developers that they are wrong?!! He's telling you you're wrong. I don't believe you could develop anything more complex than gout. > > A far better way to do a > >backup is still to make an image of the drive. > > No, it is not. It is a faster way, not a better way. You lose > information when you do a bit-to-bit. What information? Be explicit. And use terms that the rest of the planet uses. This will be fun... Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: krw on 4 Mar 2007 09:53 In article <6aeku2ppeeouq9caalhd6g4e4hqft1hvkr(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says... > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:23:33 -0500, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: > > >Sorry, but that's the drive's call. SMART tells you it _was_ time to > >buy a new drive. You don't have access to the information, for a > >number of reasons. A bit-by-bit copy won't see this information > >either. > > One does NOT need SMART turned on in order to get bad sectors mapped > out on a drive. > Clueless, MassivelyWrong. -- Keith
From: krw on 4 Mar 2007 09:54
In article <9ldku21o58531j21nnipbg2qorbqtc71li(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says... > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:38:29 -0500, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: > > >If you accept that there are disk controllers controlling > >controllers. > > > IDE controllers are ALL ON THE DRIVE. Clueless. > The part on the MOBO is called an I/O interface, NOT a drive > controller. You couldn't be more clueless, Dumbulb. -- Keith |