Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 4 Mar 2007 14:07 On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:24:46 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >Comm transfers are a completely different method based on packets >described by the several layers of protocols the comm biz has >evolved. Absolutely not. This isn't the Zmodem days you are stuck in, dipshit. TCP/IP governs the packets. The DOWNLOAD manager governs the partial file resume process. They use running checksums ALL THE TIME. That is how they begin feeding the remainder of a file. The sender starts at the correct location of the file, and begins sending again. It has NOTHING to do with the comm link standard being used. You really prove again how lost you are acting like the rest world is stuck in the bad old modem days... like you are.
From: MassiveProng on 4 Mar 2007 14:10 On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:35:48 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >Has controller functionality moved into all disk drives? That >sorta sucks. ....Do these disk drives have multi ports? >> IDE drives come two per channel. One drive's controller becomes the master, and the other gets slaved to it. The connection to the computer main board come by way of an IDE I/O interface. The controller is on the drive, right on the parallel bus of the cable, just like it should be. You cannot possibly think for a moment that ANYONE here is going to place ANY credence in ANYTHING you say after seeing here that you know NOTHING about how things are done today.
From: MassiveProng on 4 Mar 2007 14:13 On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:35:48 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >Yes,yes. Is this hardware or software? Note, for the purposes >of this discussion, firmware is soft. Oh, and exclude optical-- >I don't understand that stuff. Bwuahahahahahah! So, you have no clue as to why logical block addressing was even introduced? You scream "knows nothing" with your every post! Tell us... how many times, while you were "at the library" did you ever visit the "wikipedea" page? Your answer will be quite revealing.
From: MassiveProng on 4 Mar 2007 14:16 On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:35:48 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >Logical!!! Then it is NOT a bit-to-bit copy. Goddammit. I >goofed and believed them on this one. You're an idiot. No matter where a file is located on a volume, it can be copied 100% whether it contains errors or not. It can be spread out over hundreds of locations on the drive. Just how do you think someone downloading a file can also perform other multi-tasking routines that involve writes to the same volume? The downloaded file WILL be fragmented as it relates to it's location on the drive.
From: MassiveProng on 4 Mar 2007 14:18
On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:35:48 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >[glum emoticon here] Yea, no progres has been observed. As if a zero progress twit could ever assess someone else's progress in a realm in which you are clearly several decades behind even the most unskilled lay person. There are gang boy retards with their pants down past their asscrack on the bus that know more about it than you do. That is truly sad. |